PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joel W Hay

Publications and source records attributed to Joel W Hay.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Economic impact of antidiabetic medications and glycemic control on managed care organizations: a review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To review the recent literature (January 2000-November 2005) regarding the impact of antidiabetic medications and glycemic control on the overall costs of care for patients with diabetes in U.S. managed care organizations (MCOs). SUMMARY: The pharmacy component accounts for typically 20% to 30% (full range, 10%-65%) of overall costs for MCO patients with diabetes. About 30% of pharmacy expenses are directly related to glycemic control, while the balance is spent on the management of macrovascular and microvascular complications related to diabetes and other common comorbidities such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Cost offsets and/or cost savings have been shown with the initiation of insulin therapy, including the use of newer short-acting insulins. Increasing medication possession ratios for antidiabetic medications (including insulins) are correlated with reduced overall health care costs, particularly reductions in hospitalization rates. Patients with diagnosed diabetes not receiving medications have significantly increased health care resource utilization. We identified 8 studies that indicatred that improvements in glycemic control lower overall per-patient direct costs within MCOs. CONCLUSIONS: The literature to date suggests that improving glycemic control and antidiabetic medication persistence reduce overall medical costs for patients with diabetes in managed care plans. Continued expansion of antidiabetic medication options will place increasing pressure on MCOs to assess the return on investment for newer pharmacotherapies. Routine measurement of economic and quality-of-life outcomes alongside clinical outcomes will become necessary for assessing the total value that new antidiabetic medications provide and whether cost offsets to managed care exist. Appropriate use of antidiabetic medications, including medication compliance, is an important component in a strategy to achieve glycemic control and may improve outcomes for patients with diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2005

Economic considerations for pertussis booster vaccination in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Despite good acellular pertussis vaccine safety and protective efficacy, as well as high vaccination rates among young children, the incidence of pertussis in the United States has steadily increased since the 1980s. This is especially true for adolescents and adults who are susceptible because of waning immunity, which is not long lived. Other populations are at increased risk for morbidity of infection, although infants younger than 6 months of age who have not completed the primary immunization series have the greatest morbidity and mortality. Other groups who might benefit from booster immunizations include hospital workers, family contacts, and individuals with compromised health. Although older individuals generally have milder illnesses, they are often the source of infection for younger children. An adolescent/adult formulation of acellular pertussis vaccine requires a lower dose of pertussis antigens and can be combined with currently recommended diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (Tdap). These new vaccines for adolescents and adults are safe, immunogenic, and protective. METHODS: Through an extensive review of the literature, the direct and indirect costs associated with pertussis and its complications are examined, cost-benefit analyses of pertussis booster vaccination are evaluated for different groups, and the economic considerations involved in implementing a pertussis booster vaccination program in adolescents are discussed. RESULTS: Pertussis infections cause outbreaks in schools, families, and workplaces, resulting in prolonged morbidity and significant costs for medical care, lost time, and wages. Physician visits, chest radiographs, and antibiotics comprise the majority of direct costs, and costs associated with work loss often comprise the majority of indirect costs related to pertussis illness. Adolescents and adults also transmit their infections to nonimmune children. A cost-benefit analysis evaluated the health and economic benefits of seven strategies for administering a pertussis booster. The most economical strategy is to immunize all adolescents 10-19 years of age, which may prevent 0.4-1.8 million cases of pertussis and save US 0.3-1.6 billion dollars in a decade. A tetanus and diphtheria booster (Td) is currently recommended for children 11-12 years of age. The Tdap vaccine offers an enhancement for the Td booster by providing protection against pertussis, and it will not require an additional injection or office visit. CONCLUSIONS: Immunizing adolescents with a pertussis booster in the form of Tdap is the most economical and easiest-to-implement strategy and should provide significant health and economic benefits.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Cost effectiveness of treating low HDL-cholesterol in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: A low serum level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Fibrates, particularly gemfibrozil, have been shown to raise HDL-cholesterol levels and reduce the incidence of CHD. The literature on fibrate cost effectiveness is quite limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis is to determine the cost effectiveness of the fibrates gemfibrozil and fenofibrate in the primary prevention of CHD. The target population includes patients with low levels of HDL-cholesterol, but without pre-existing CHD or other CHD risk factors sufficiently elevated to indicate drug therapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From a societal perspective, a lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness model was developed to calculate baseline and treatment costs, life-years gained and QALYs gained. Model parameter values were taken from existing literature. In this 'backward induction' model, the expected costs and outcomes for each 5-year time-interval are utilised in subsequent 5-year time period calculations over the patient's entire lifetime. The study population consisted of a hypothetical cohort of males and females in the US aged 45-74 years, with low levels of HDL-cholesterol and no prior history of CHD. The base-case CHD risk factors for this population were obtained from the VA-HIT (Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial) population baseline characteristics, but assuming no prior CHD history. Estimates for the reduction in CHD risk associated with fibrate therapy reduction are also taken from the VA-HIT study. RESULTS: Using a societal cost-effectiveness threshold of US$50, 000 per QALY, primary prevention of CHD in patients with low HDL-cholesterol levels using generic gemfibrozil therapy is cost effective for all age and sex categories, in contrast to fenofibrate therapy, which is cost effective for males, but not for females at baseline risks levels. In the base-case scenario, because of their higher CHD lifetime risk, it is more cost effective to treat males than females with either gemfibrozil or fenofibrate. For males and females the cost per QALY decreases with age for most age intervals. Gemfibrozil is more cost effective than fenofibrate for all age-sex categories because of the assumed equal efficacy and the higher fenofibrate drug cost. In the comparison scenario, generic lovastatin was more cost effective than gemfibrozil for men except at age 45 years and women at all ages, and more cost effective than fenofibrate for both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that fibrate therapy, particularly with generic gemfibrozil, is cost effective in the primary prevention of CHD in individuals with low HDL-cholesterol levels, with or without elevated triglyceride levels. Certain patient subgroups, such as those with elevated triglyceride levels, smokers and those with diabetes mellitus are likely to achieve both CHD risk reduction and overall savings in net expected medical care costs. Comparable cost-effectiveness results are also shown for lovastatin therapy in the target patient population. Gemfibrozil dominates fenofibrate because of the lower cost of therapy (direct and indirect costs). These conclusions are robust to reasonable changes in model parameter values.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness analysis of rizatriptan and sumatriptan versus Cafergot in the acute treatment of migraine.

BACKGROUND: Both ergotamine and selective serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists ('triptans') are currently used in the treatment of moderate to severe migraine. Ergotamine is a traditional therapy with a lower drug acquisition cost compared with triptans. It has been shown that triptans are more efficacious than ergotamine, but the higher acquisition costs and shorter duration of action are disadvantages of triptans compared with ergotamine. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide a comparison of the cost-effectiveness of rizatriptan 10 mg and sumatriptan 50 mg tablets with that of a fixed-dose combination of ergotamine tartrate plus caffeine (Cafergot) in the treatment of an acute migraine attack. The cost-effectiveness of rizatriptan in comparison with sumatriptan was also assessed. METHODS: Three separate decision tree models were developed (model 1: rizatriptan vs Cafergot; model 2: sumatriptan vs Cafergot; model 3: rizatriptan vs sumatriptan). The time horizon was 1 year. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the societal perspective using cost and effectiveness estimates from the literature. All costs were converted to US dollars (2003). The cost-effectiveness ratio was expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Base case evaluation showed that both rizatriptan and sumatriptan dominated Cafergot. The net annual saving associated with use of rizatriptan was US dollars 622.98 per patient, with an incremental QALY of 0.001. Use of sumatriptan resulted in a saving of US dollars 620.90 and an increase in QALY. The cost-effective ratios were not sensitive to changes in key variables such as efficacy, utility, drug costs, hospitalisation cost and patient preference over alternative therapies. The study further showed that rizatriptan is more cost effective than sumatriptan, as evidenced by its lower cost and greater effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness ratios were sensitive to moderate changes in drug efficacy. CONCLUSION: Rizatriptan and sumatriptan were less costly and more effective than Cafergot in the treatment of an acute migraine attack. Rizatriptan was somewhat less costly and more effective than sumatriptan. Additional quality-of-life studies are needed to confirm the benefits of using triptans in the management of migraine.

Caffeine↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation of strategies for use of acellular pertussis vaccine in adolescents and adults: a cost-benefit analysis.

Pertussis is increasingly recognized as a source of infection in adults who then commonly infect young children. Immunity to illness caused by Bordetella pertussis is not long-lived, so optimal control of pertussis may require booster immunizations. In a cost-benefit analysis, we evaluated the benefits of 7 independent strategies for administering a pertussis booster, in the form of a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine, to adolescents and adults. Break-even vaccine costs for each strategy were calculated by dividing costs preventable by vaccine by the number of persons eligible for vaccination. Of these strategies, the most economical would be to immunize adolescents 10-19 years of age, which would prevent 0.7-1.8 million pertussis cases and save 0.6 dollars-1.6 billion dollars over a decade. Although justified by our analysis, routine adult booster vaccinations every decade would be more expensive and more difficult to implement. A recommendation for booster vaccinations every 10 years requires more information about duration of immunity, program costs, compliance, and nonmedical costs associated with pertussis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Cost-effectiveness of primary implanted cardioverter defibrillator for sudden death prevention in congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is expensive but highly effective in preventing sudden death. The value of primary prophylactic ICD in preventing sudden death for congestive heart failure patients (CHF) has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of primary prophylactic ICD vs. standard drug therapy for preventing CHF sudden death. DESIGN: Incremental Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) using a lifetime decision model. DATA SOURCES: Estimates of cost, utility and probabilities from literature, clinical experts, CMS fee schedule payments, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. TARGET POPULATION: U.S. CHF patients with NYHA functional Class II and III. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime; future values discounted at 3%. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: In 2002 prices the discounted lifetime cost is 122,947 dollars with primary prophylactic ICD and 25,223 dollars without ICD; the QALYs gained were 2.9031 and 1.9045 respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 97,861 dollars per QALY saved with prophylactic ICD. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: ICD is not cost-effective under plausible scenarios using 50,000-80,000 dollars per QALY as the cost effectiveness threshold. The cost-effectiveness ratio is quite sensitive to patient utility after ICD implantation, and the proportion of CHF patients experiencing sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: Using a standard cost-effectiveness threshold and plausible parameter ranges, it is unlikely that ICD is cost-effectiveness in preventing CHF sudden death relative to standard drug therapy.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation and review of pharmacoeconomic models.

Difficult decisions as to whether to provide or withhold drug therapy to patients are needed to be made on a daily basis. These decisions should be based on carefully designed and constructed pharmacoeconomic models, with explicit and justifiable parameter values, validated by publication in peer-reviewed literature. This review describes and evaluates the common types of pharmacoeconomic models, modelling approaches and methods. It also discusses model quality, validity and usefulness.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2003

Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies.

PURPOSE: To provide a practical quantitative tool for appraising the quality of cost-effectiveness (CE) studies. METHODS: A committee comprising [corrected] of health economists selected a set of criteria for the instrument from an item pool. Data collected with a conjoint analysis survey on 120 international health economists were used to estimate weights for each criterion with a random effects regression model. To validate the grading system, a survey was sent to 60 individuals with health economics expertise. Participants first rated the quality of three CE studies on a visual analogue scale, and then evaluated each study using the grading system. Spearman rho and Wilcoxon tests were used to detect convergent validity and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for discriminant validity. Agreement between the global rating by experts and the grading system was also examined. RESULTS: Sixteen criteria were selected. Their coefficient estimates ranged from 1.2 to 8.9, with a sum of 93.5 on a 100-point scale. The only insignificant criterion was "use of subgroup analyses." Both convergent validity and discriminant validity of the grading system were shown by the results of the Spearman rho (correlation coefficient = 0.78, P < 0.0001), Wilcoxon test (P = 0.53), and ANCOVA (F(3,146) = 5.97, p = 0.001). The grading system had good agreement with global rating by experts. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument appears to be simple, internally consistent, and valid for measuring the perceived quality of CE studies. Applicability for use in clinical and resource allocation decision-making deserves further study.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2003

Effects of ambulatory-care pharmacist consultation on mortality and hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 3 alternative models of ambulatory-care pharmacist consultation on patient survival and hospitalization. STUDY DESIGN: Patients were randomly chosen adult Kaiser Permanente (KP) Southern California enrollees with at least 1 prescription in the base year. The demonstration lasted 23 months. Using time-dependent proportional hazards estimation, survival and hospitalization were examined across 5 patient risk groups. INTERVENTIONS: The pharmacy interventions were (1) consultation about new or changed prescriptions as mandated by 1992 state and federal regulations (State model), (2) consultation focused on selected high-risk ambulatory care patients (KP model), and (3) pre-1992 standard care (Control model). RESULTS: In the 6 service areas in which only 1 of the models was implemented, both the KP (relative risk [RR] = 0.295, P < .001) and State (RR = 0.338, P < .001) models significantly reduced emergency hospital admissions over 2 years compared with the Control model when measured across all risk groups. The State model also was associated with fewer urgent and emergency admissions (RR = 0.854, P < .001). In the randomized treatment sample of 5499 patients, the KP model was associated with lower total mortality per new prescription filled (RR = 0.921, P < .01), and significantly lower hospitalization and mortality in high-risk patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive outpatient pharmacist consultation targeting high-risk patients would improve survival and decrease hospitalization rates. Broader nontargeted consultation would reduce hospitalizations, but was not associated with lower mortality within the 2-year intervention.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Understanding the underlying drivers of inpatient cost growth: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: After the declining growth in inpatient hospital spending that occurred from 1994 through 1998, the recent trend in increased spending has been of concern to many. Understanding the underlying reasons for this new growth will aid decision makers in finding best means to manage inpatient costs. OBJECTIVE: To identify potential contributors to recent growth in inpatient spending. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. METHODS: Healthcare and economic databases, prominent Web sites, and key journals were searched to identify potential drivers for the 1999-2001 rise in inpatient spending. Initial literature review and state-level regression analyses published in a companion paper were used to identify key explanatory factors, which were further explored. RESULTS: Although many of the contributors to the rise in inpatient costs overlap and are interrelated, the major cost drivers were identified as (1) workforce shortage; (2) new technology; (3) less tightly managed care; and (4) shifting hospital business directions. Underlying factors such as legislation, quality of care, limited access to noninpatient care, pressures on the safety net, population aging, and increasing chronic illness prevalence were found to influence the contributors and healthcare spending in general. CONCLUSIONS: Future trends in inpatient spending will depend on the response of the healthcare system to these cost drivers and underlying factors. Potential avenues to control inpatient spending include expanding access to primary care, encouraging cost-effective technology and more efficient hospital market structures, and developing incentives for the healthcare workforce.

Cost of Illness↗
PubMed2003

Hospital cost drivers: an evaluation of 1998-2001 state-level data.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the determinants of increased hospital inpatient expenditure growth since 1998. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: Multivariate regression analyses were estimated for 1998-2001 utilizing state-level information from nationally representative population sources, US government agencies, and aggregate expenditures estimated from a nationally representative large health insurance plan (LHIP). RESULTS: During 1998-2001, LHIP inpatient expenditures per member increased by an average of 5.9% annually, twice the 2.9% annual rate of inflation. Overall level of economic activity, price-level variation, hospital technology, hospital market, and healthcare labor force are the most important drivers of recent trends in inpatient expenditures. Inpatient costs were responsive to hospital market characteristics. Each 1% increase in for-profit and medical system (chain ownership) hospital percentage was associated with approximately a 2% increase in inpatient expenditures. Each 1% increase in network (shared purchasing or other arrangement, but not ownership) hospital percentage was associated with a 1% decrease in inpatient expenditures. Each 1% increase in the gap between registered nurse demand and supply led to a 0.5% to 1% increase in hospital inpatient expenditures per capita. CONCLUSIONS: Many characteristics contribute to inpatient expenditure growth, such as local area wages and incomes per capita, and physician market characteristics, but are not directly influenced by hospital market policies. Hospital technology and market structure are the 2 factors that are most directly amenable to healthcare policy intervention. Hospital occupancy and case-mix severity also have substantial effects on inpatient expenditure growth. With the nurse supply shortage projected to increase by 40% between 2000 and 2005, upward pressures on inpatient costs will remain.

Cost of Illness↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmaceutical care in a medicare drug benefit program.

OBJECTIVES: Although there has recently been substantial interest in a Medicare drug benefit program, little attention has focused on ensuring improved access to medication monitoring for Medicare beneficiaries. Using a societal perspective, we evaluated the impact pharmacists could have on inappropriate prescribing, patient compliance, and medication-related morbidity and mortality within a Medicare drug benefits program. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was performed. A comprehensive MEDLINE search for relevant literature identified data sources and model parameters. RESULTS: In the base case, a pharmaceutical care benefit in the elderly population would cost US dollars 2100 (year 2000 prices) per life-year saved, which is highly cost-effective. Reasonable changes in model parameters did not raise the cost-effectiveness ratio above US dollars 13000 per life-year saved. CONCLUSION: Despite limitations in both the quantity and the specificity of data available, pharmaceutical care appears to be a highly cost-effective augmentation to a Medicare drug benefit program. This result is robust to model parameter changes. This model is conservative in that it does not include ongoing benefits from medication monitoring or increased elderly drug utilization and polypharmacy as the Medicare drug program is phased in.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cost and utilization impacts of oral antihistamines in the California Medi-Cal program.

OBJECTIVES: Newer oral allergic rhinitis (AR) medications, the second-generation antihistamines (SGAs) have gained widespread acceptance because of their efficacy and reduced side effects relative to first-generation antihistamines (FGAs). There are no empirical studies comparing the costs of treatment of SGAs relative to FGAs. METHODS: We analyzed data from a 20% beneficiary sample (approximately 120,000 continuously enrolled beneficiaries per year) for the Medi-Cal Fee-for-Service program during 1999 to 2000. AR medications available under Medi-Cal included three SGA medications (loratadine, fexofenadine, and cetirizine) and over 200 FGA products containing either diphenhydramine or chlorpheniramine or both. Because multiple medications were evaluated, a sample selection model was estimated using a two-stage multinomial logistic--variance components regression framework. RESULTS: SGA medications have significantly lower total direct health-care treatment costs per patient than FGA medications with costs ranging from US 347 dollars to US 448 dollars less (P < 0.001), despite higher AR medication costs. Total drug expenditures were also not significantly different for patients using SGA or FGA medications despite SGA prescriptions averaging US 47 dollars higher than FGAs. Emergency department visits, inpatient admissions and physician office visits were also significantly lower for patients using SGA medications. CONCLUSIONS: Significant cost and utilization reductions were associated with all of the SGA medications relative to FGA drugs, despite their higher acquisition costs. If facing higher copayments for prescription AR drugs, many patients, particularly lower income patients, may choose cheaper over-the-counter (OTC) FGAs rather than SGAs. Our analysis finds this might lead to increased overall health-care treatment costs, unless Medicaid and health insurance plans subsidize OTC AR medications.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Expensive conditions.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Examining the value and quality of health economic analyses: implications of utilizing the QHES.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the increasing use of health economic studies and practical implications of evaluating their quality utilizing the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. METHODS: We first reviewed secondary references to examine ways in which health economic analyses are used in different health care settings, the manner in which these data are appraised and evaluated, and their relevance and value in decision making. The QHES, a new instrument designed to support fast, accurate initial assessments of study quality, was then introduced and validated. A case study was performed using the QHES to score the quality of 30 cost-effectiveness studies in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) published since 1985. Areas where additional research could guide efforts to identify and enhance the use of higher-quality cost-effectiveness studies were suggested. RESULTS: Results from the published validation study of the QHES demonstrated the validity of this new instrument. The resulting QHES scores in the case study of GERD papers ranged from 43 to 91 with a mean of 63.6 (SD=14.7). Approximately 27% of the studies rated had scores less than 50, and 27% had scores above or equal to 75. All 30 studies made conclusions and recommendations and justified them based on their study results. Most studies used appropriate cost and health outcome measures. Very few studies stated the perspective of their analysis and reasons for its selection. The majority of the studies did not perform incremental analysis. CONCLUSION: An examination of the QHES validation study and the case study in GERD suggests that there is a rationale and potential utility to use a quality scoring system for cost-effectiveness studies. The QHES may play an important role in discriminating higher-quality cost-effectiveness information to enhance decision making. The QHES can also serve as a guideline for conducting and reporting future cost-effectiveness studies, as an aid in the editorial process, and for stratification in systematic reviews. Complex decisions regarding resource allocation rarely rely solely on economic considerations but do increasingly use health economic analyses. To the extent that such analyses are used, the QHES may help ensure that higher-quality analyses receive more analytic attention and greater weight in the decision-making process.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗