PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Johan M Bosmans

Publications and source records attributed to Johan M Bosmans.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Chronic heart failure: an example of a systemic chronic inflammatory disease resulting in cachexia.

Chronic heart failure is no longer a mere cardiac entity, but involves several, initially adaptive and later detrimental, neurohumoral compensatory mechanisms. Peripheral manifestations of the disease, such as endothelial dysfunction, skeletal muscle changes, and disturbances in ventilatory control, are major determinants of symptoms. The independent prognostic value and the relevance of cachexia on morbidity of patients with chronic heart failure have only recently been recognised. Altered body composition in heart failure patients is reflected in the early loss of muscle tissue but affects all tissue compartments in case of cardiac cachexia. Recently, a new portfolio of biologically active molecules, termed cytokines, have been shown to play an important role in the development and progression of both cardiac and peripheral abnormalities. Similar to other chronic illnesses, covered in the remainder of this issue, a low-grade chronic inflammatory process may be of particular relevance in the development of tissue wasting in these patients. Whereas the presence of immune activation in chronic heart failure is now widely accepted, as well as the prognostic relevance of chronic inflammation, the site and the source of cytokine production remain the object of intense research. Although the inciting event is located in the heart, cross-talk between the myocardium on the one hand, and the immune system, peripheral tissues and organs on the other hand, will lead to the overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines and, inevitably, to their detrimental effects. The specific problems related to heart failure progression and inflammatory activation are described in this review.

Animals↗

Stereology: a simplified and more time-efficient method than planimetry for the quantitative analysis of vascular structures in different models of intimal thickening.

OBJECTIVE: Semiautomatic computer-assisted planimetry is currently the standard morphometric technique in models of intimal thickening. We evaluated stereological point counting as an alternative method for the measurement of cross-sectional vascular areas (lumen, intima, and media) by comparing precision, efficiency, and variance components. METHODS: Sections from murine atherosclerotic aorta (n = 21), stented rabbit iliac arteries (n = 30), and porcine coronary arteries (n = 30) were analyzed at two institutes using both techniques. To determine reproducibility, porcine arteries were measured twice. RESULTS: Area measurements showed almost identical means and standard deviations for planimetry and stereology [e.g., intima (mm2): 0.10+/-0.11 vs. 0.12+/-0.12 (mouse), 0.60+/-0.16 vs. 0.60+/-0.15 (rabbit), and 1.92+/-1.52 vs. 1.97+/-1.61 (pig)]. Deming regression and Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a good agreement between both techniques that was not influenced by artery size. Both methods exhibited excellent repeatability, although planimetry (-0.18+/-0.27) was more precise than stereology (-0.17+/-0.47; variance, P < .01, Levene test). In addition, intraoperator variance (error inherent to the technique) was greater for stereology (1.6-15.8% vs. 4.8-33.5%), whereas interoperator variance (error between institutes) was very small for both methods (0.1-0.9% vs. 0.1-1.7%). Indeed, biologic variability was, by far, the most important variance component in all measurements (84-98% vs. 65-95%). Finally, stereology required 20% (mouse; P < .05) to 40% (pig; P < .001) less time to complete analysis. CONCLUSION: The quantification of vascular structures by planimetry and stereology yielded comparable results in all models of intimal thickening, but stereology proved to be less time-consuming. Therefore, study design may dictate the most appropriate choice of technique.

Animals↗

A three-dimensional quantitative analysis of restenosis parameters after balloon angioplasty: comparison between semi-automatic computer-assisted planimetry and stereology.

Semi-automatic computer-assisted planimetry is often used for the quantification of restenosis parameters after balloon angioplasty although it is a time-consuming method. Moreover, slicing the artery to enable analysis of two-dimensional (2-D) images leads to a loss of information since the vessel structure is three-dimensional (3-D). Cavalieri's principle uses systematic random sampling allowing 3-D quantification. This study compares the accuracy and efficiency of planimetry versus point-counting measurements on restenosis parameters after balloon angioplasty and investigates the use of Cavalieri's principle for 3-D volume quantification. Bland and Altman plots showed good agreement between planimetry and point counting for the 2-D and 3-D quantification of lumen, internal elastic lamina (IEL) and external elastic lamina (EEL), with a slightly smaller agreement for intima and media. Mean values and induced coefficients of variation were similar for both methods for all parameters. Point counting induced a 6% error in its 3-D quantification, which is negligible in view of the biological variation (>90%) among animals. However, point counting was 3 times faster compared to planimetry, improving its efficiency. This study shows that combining Cavalieri's principle with point counting is a precise and efficient method for the 3-D quantification of restenosis parameters after balloon angioplasty.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗