Biomedical subjects

John A. Nevin

Publications and source records attributed to John A. Nevin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Reinforcement context and resistance to change.

Eight pigeons responded in a multiple variable-interval (VI) schedule in which a constant component always delivered 40rft/h, and an alternated component was either rich (200rft/h) or lean (6.67rft/h) in different conditions. Four tests of resistance to change were conducted in each condition: prefeeding, full extinction, constant-component-only extinction, and response-independent food. Resistance to both prefeeding and full extinction in the constant component varied inversely with the reinforcement rate in the alternated component, but resistance to response-independent food did not. The extinction and response-independent food results were consistent with [J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Proc. 25 (1999) 256] behavioral momentum model. Maintaining reinforcement in the alternated component increased resistance to extinction in the constant component, as predicted by the behavioral momentum model but not accounts of multiple-schedule performance based on [J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 13 (1970) 243] equation. Overall, the momentum model gave a good account of the results with the exception of the prefeeding data. Possible ways to reconcile the prefeeding results with behavioral momentum theory are considered.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2003

Mathematical principles of reinforcement and resistance to change.

Although Killeen's mathematical principles of reinforcement (MPR) apply to the asymptotic rate of a free operant after extended exposure to a single schedule of reinforcement, they can be extended to resistance to change in multiple schedules via alterations in the parameter representing the activating effects of reinforcers. MPR's predictions of resistance to change in relation to reinforcer rate on variable-interval (VI) schedules are empirically correct and agree with behavioral momentum theory (BMT). However, both MPR and BMT encounter problems in accounting for the effects of delayed reinforcement on resistance to change, relative to immediate reinforcement at the same rate. Further problems are raised by differences in resistance to change between variable-ratio (VR) and variable-interval performances maintained by the same reinforcer rate. With both delayed versus immediate reinforcement and variable-ratio versus variable-interval reinforcement, differential resistance to change is negatively correlated with the log ratios of baseline response rates when reinforcer rates are equated. Cases where resistance to change varies despite equated reinforcer rates, and the correlations among behavioral measures, provide challenges and opportunities for both MPR and BMT.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Measuring behavioral momentum.

The metaphor of behavioral momentum proposes that when ongoing operant behavior is disrupted, changes in response rate are directly related to a force-like aspect of the disruptor and inversely proportional to behavioral mass. Several data sets suggest that differential resistance to change between the components of a multiple schedule satisfies the requirements of a ratio scale and is additive when different disruptors and different dimensions of reinforcement are combined. Differential resistance also provides a basis for scaling force in relation to rate of food presentation between components as a disruptor, and for scaling mass in relation to food rate within a component as a reinforcer. Preference in concurrent chains with terminal links identical to multiple-schedule components also meets the requirements of ratio-scale measurement, is additive when different dimensions of reinforcement are combined, and provides convergent measurement of behavioral mass.

Journal Article↗