PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John Bergfeld

Publications and source records attributed to John Bergfeld.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Return to play issues in upper extremity injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to outline general treatment and return to play (RTP) strategies as they pertain to athletes with various upper extremity injuries. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review of these injuries. DATA SOURCES/SYNTHESIS: A review of the literature plus expert opinion served as the basis for recommendations made regarding management strategies for returning the athlete to play after upper extremity injury. A Medline search was performed using the following key words: upper extremity injury, return to play, glenohumeral dislocation, acromioclavicular joint sprains, elbow dislocation, scaphoid fracture, metacarpal fracture, finger dislocation, tendon injury, hand, mallet finger, and jersey finger. These and other related terms were crossed using the Medline database from 1966 to 2005. RESULTS: Review of book chapters, articles generated from the Medline search, and expert opinion led to the recommendations that are presented here. There is general agreement regarding the treatment of many of the injuries discussed, but controversies do exist. RTP guidelines are largely dependent on the severity of initial injury, rates of healing, and return of strength. CONCLUSIONS: Each athlete with a particular injury to the upper extremity needs to be approached as an individual as no single set of treatment or RTP guidelines applies to all injuries or all individuals. Factors such as age, injury severity, hand dominance, type of sport participation, method of treatment, and chronicity of injury are among the many issues that must be considered when developing a treatment and RTP strategy for a particular athlete.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗

Non-linear fitting of mechanical data for efficacy determination of single versus double bundle Achilles tendon grafts for PCL reconstructions.

The Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) consists of two primary bundles and is the primary restraint to posterior tibial translation. The emergence of the Posterior Tibial Inlay Technique (PTIT) has demonstrated a mechanical advantage over the commonly used Tibial Tunnel Method (TTM). This study was designed to investigate the effects on knee mechanics from both a Single-bundle (SB) and Double-bundle (DB) Achilles tendon PCL reconstruction using a PTIT. The investigators hypothesized that a DB graft demonstrates a mechanical advantage compared to the SB graft. A materials testing machine provided six sequential loading cycles of 100 N while total translation was measured. The testing was conducted at 90 degrees, 60 degrees, 30 degrees and 10 degrees of flexion in neutral tibial rotation. While the mechanical advantages of the DB graft were detected, specifically at small laxity values and in the physiological range of normal gait, the additional complexity of the technique may clinically outweigh the mechanical advantages.

Achilles Tendon↗