PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John C Flickinger

Publications and source records attributed to John C Flickinger.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Clinical results: Radiosurgery and radiotherapy of cranial nerve schwannomas.

Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy are two attractive low-morbidity alternatives to surgical resection for managing cranial nerve schwannomas. Treatment outcomes from these radiation treatment approaches are well documented with long-term outcome studies from multiple institutions. Differences in outcome between these two modalities are difficult to define clearly. The low morbidity and high long-term tumor control rates with radiation treatment have made it the choice of many patients who opt for active initial management for small- or medium-sized cranial nerve schwannomas.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed2006

Prospective staged volume radiosurgery for large arteriovenous malformations: indications and outcomes in otherwise untreatable patients.

OBJECTIVE: The obliteration response of an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) to radiosurgery is strongly dependent on dose and volume. For larger volumes, the dose must be reduced for safety, but this compromises obliteration. In 1992, we prospectively began to stage anatomic components in order to deliver higher single doses to symptomatic AVMs >15 ml in volume. METHODS: During a 17-year interval at the University of Pittsburgh, 1040 patients underwent radiosurgery for a brain AVM. Out of 135 patients who had multiple procedures, 37 patients underwent prospectively staged volume radiosurgery for symptomatic otherwise unmanageable larger malformations. Twenty-eight patients who were managed before 2002 were included in this study to achieve sufficient follow-up in assessing the outcomes. The median age was 37 years (range, 13-57 yr). Thirteen patients had previous hemorrhages and 13 patients had attempted embolization. Separate anatomic volumes were irradiated at 3 to 8 months (median, 5 mo) intervals. The median initial AVM volume was 24.9 ml (range, 10.2-57.7 ml). Twenty-six patients had two stages and two had three-stage radiosurgery. Seven patients had repeat radiosurgery after a median interval of 63 months. The median target volume was 12.3 ml. (range, 4.2-20.8 ml.) at Stage I and 11.5 ml. (range, 2.8-22 ml.) at Stage II. The median margin dose was 16 Gy at both stages. Median follow-up after the last stage of radiosurgery was 50 months (range, 3-159 mo). RESULTS: Four patients (14%) sustained a hemorrhage after radiosurgery; two died and two patients recovered with mild permanent neurological deficits. Worsened neurological deficits developed in one patient. Seizure control was improved in three patients, was stable in eight patients and worsened in two. Magnetic resonance imaging showed T2 prolongation in four patients (14%). Out of 28 patients, 21 had follow-up more than 36 months. Out of 21 patients, seven underwent repeat radiosurgery and none of them had enough follow- up. Of 14 patients followed for more than 36 months, seven (50%) had total, four (29%) near total, and three (21%) had moderate AVM obliteration. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective staged volume radiosurgery provided imaging defined volumetric reduction or closure in a series of large AVMs unsuitable for any other therapy. After 5 years, this early experience suggests that AVM related symptoms can be stabilized and anticipated bleed rates can be reduced.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Long-term survivors after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery, with or without whole-brain radiation therapy, has become a valued management choice for patients with brain metastases, although their median survival remains limited. In patients who receive successful extracranial cancer care, patients who have controlled intracranial disease are living longer. The authors evaluated all brain metastasis in patients who lived for > or = 4 years after radiosurgery to determine clinical and treatment patterns potentially responsible for their outcome. METHODS: Six hundred seventy-seven patients with brain metastases underwent 781 radiosurgery procedures between 1988 and 2000. Data from the entire series were reviewed; and, if patients had > or = 4 years of survival, then they were evaluated for information on brain and extracranial treatment, symptoms, imaging responses, need for further care, and management morbidity. These long-term survivors were compared with a cohort who lived for < 3 months after radiosurgery (n = 100 patients). RESULTS: Forty-four patients (6.5%) survived for > 4 years after radiosurgery (mean, 69 mos with 16 patients still alive). The mean age at radiosurgery was 53 years (maximum age, 72 yrs), and the median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90. The lung (n = 15 patients), breast (n = 9 patients), kidney (n = 7 patients), and skin (melanoma; n = 6 patients) were the most frequent primary sites. Two or more organ sites outside the brain were involved in 18 patients (41%), the primary tumor plus lymph nodes were involved in 10 patients (23%), only the primary tumor was involved in 9 patients (20%), and only brain disease was involved in 7 patients (16%), indicating that extended survival was possible even in patients with multiorgan disease. Serial imaging of 133 tumors showed that 99 tumors were smaller (74%), 22 tumors were unchanged (17%), and 12 tumors were larger (9%). Four patients had a permanent neurologic deficit after brain tumor management, and six patients underwent a resection after radiosurgery. Compared with the patients who had limited survival (< 3 mos), long-term survivors had a higher initial KPS (P = 0.01), fewer brain metastases (P = 0.04), and less extracranial disease (P < 0.00005). CONCLUSIONS: Although the expected survival of patients with brain metastases may be limited, selected patients with effective intracranial and extracranial care for malignant disease can have prolonged, good-quality survival. The extent of extracranial disease at the time of radiosurgery was predictive of outcome, but this does not necessarily mean that patients cannot live for years if treatment is effective.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Stereotactic radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes after a single stereotactic radiosurgery procedure for the care of patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred five patients with primary malignancies, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (42%), breast carcinoma (23%), melanoma (17%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), colon cancer (3%), and others (10%) underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for 4 or more intracranial metastases at one time. The median number of brain metastases was 5 (range, 4-18) with a median total treatment volume of 6.8 cc (range, 0.6-51.0 cc). Radiosurgery was used as sole management (17% of patients), or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (46%) or after failure of whole brain radiotherapy (38%). The median marginal radiosurgery dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy). The mean follow-up was 8 months. RESULTS: The median overall survival after radiosurgery for all patients was 8 months. The 1-year local control rate was 71%, and the median time to progressive/new brain metastases was 9 months. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification system, the median overall survivals for RPA classes I, II, and III were 18, 9, and 3 months, respectively (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis revealed total treatment volume, age, RPA classification, and marginal dose as significant prognostic factors. The number of metastases was not statistically significant (p = 0.333). CONCLUSION: Radiosurgery seems to provide survival benefit for patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. Because total treatment volume was the most significant predictor of survival, the total volume of brain metastases, rather than the number of metastases, should be considered in identifying appropriate radiosurgery candidates.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the evidence for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery in adult patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Key clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based review were identified. Outcomes considered were overall survival, quality of life or symptom control, brain tumor control or response and toxicity. MEDLINE (1990-2004 June Week 2), CANCERLIT (1990-2003), CINAHL (1990-2004 June Week 2), EMBASE (1990-2004 Week 25), and the Cochrane library (2004 issue 2) databases were searched using OVID. In addition, the Physician Data Query clinical trials database, the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (1997-2004), ASTRO (1997-2004), and the European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) (1997-2003) were searched. Data from the literature search were reviewed and tabulated. This process included an assessment of the level of evidence. RESULTS: For patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases, managed with whole-brain radiotherapy alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery boost, there were three randomized controlled trials, zero prospective studies, and seven retrospective series (which satisfied inclusion criteria). For patients with up to three (<4 cm) newly diagnosed brain metastases (and in one study up to four brain metastases), radiosurgery boost with whole-brain radiotherapy significantly improves local brain control rates as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone (Level I-III evidence). In one large randomized trial, survival benefit with whole-brain radiotherapy was observed in patients with single brain metastasis. In this trial, an overall increased ability to taper down on steroid dose and an improvement in Karnofsky performance status was seen in patients who were treated with radiosurgery boost as compared with patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. However, Level I evidence regarding overall quality of life outcomes using a validated instrument has not been reported. All randomized trials showed improved local control with the addition of radiosurgery to whole-brain radiotherapy. For patients with multiple brain metastases, there is no overall survival benefit with the use of radiosurgery boost to whole-brain radiotherapy (Level I-III evidence). Radiosurgery boost is associated with a small risk of early or late toxicity. In patients treated with radiosurgery alone (withholding whole-brain radiotherapy) as initial treatment, there were 2 randomized trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 16 retrospective series. There is Level I to Level III evidence that the use of radiosurgery alone does not alter survival as compared to the use of whole-brain radiotherapy. However, there is Level I to Level III evidence that omission of whole-brain radiotherapy results in poorer intracranial disease control, both local and distant (defined as remaining brain, outside the radiosurgery field). Quality of life outcomes have not been adequately reported. Radiosurgery is associated with a small risk of early or late toxicity. Radiosurgery as salvage for patients with brain metastases was reported in zero randomized trials, one prospective study, and seven retrospective series. CONCLUSIONS: Based on Level I-III evidence, for selected patients with small (up to 4 cm) brain metastases (up to three in number and four in one randomized trial), the addition of radiosurgery boost to whole-brain radiotherapy improves brain control as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. In patients with a single brain metastasis, radiosurgery boost with whole-brain radiotherapy improves survival. There is a small risk of toxicity associated with radiosurgery boost as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. In selected patients treated with radiosurgery alone for newly diagnosed brain metastases, overall survival is not altered. However, local and distant brain control is significantly poorer with omission of upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (Level I-III evidence). Whether neurocognition or quality of life outcomes are different between initial radiosurgery alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy (with or without radiosurgery boost) is unknown, because this has not been adequately tested. There was no statistically significant difference in overall toxicity between those treated with radiosurgery alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery boost based on an interim report from one randomized study. There is insufficient evidence as to the clinical benefit/risks radiosurgery used in the setting of recurrent or progressive brain metastases, although radiographic responses are well-documented.

Brain Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for malignant glioma.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the evidence for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy in adult patients with malignant glioma. METHODS: Key clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based review were identified. Outcomes considered were overall survival, quality of life or symptom control, brain tumor control or response and toxicity. MEDLINE (1990-2004 June Week 2), CANCERLIT (1990-2003), CINAHL (1990-2004 June Week 2), EMBASE (1990-2004 Week 25), and the Cochrane library (2004 issue 2) databases were searched using OVID. In addition, the Physician Data Query clinical trials database, the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1997-2004), ASTRO (1997-2004), and the European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) (1997-2003) were searched. Data from the literature search were reviewed and tabulated. This process included an assessment of the level of evidence. RESULTS: For patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma, radiosurgery as boost therapy with conventional external beam radiation was examined in one randomized trial, five prospective cohort studies, and seven retrospective series. There is Level I evidence that the use of radiosurgery boost followed by external beam radiotherapy and carmustine (BCNU) does not confer benefit with respect to overall survival, quality of life, or patterns of failure as compared with external beam radiotherapy and BCNU. There is Level I-III evidence of toxicity associated with radiosurgery boost as compared with external beam radiotherapy alone. The results of the prospective and retrospective studies may be influenced by selection bias. Radiosurgery used as salvage for recurrent or progressive malignant glioma after conventional external beam radiotherapy failure was reported in zero randomized trials, three prospective cohort studies, and five retrospective series. The available data are sparse and insufficient to make absolute recommendations. Stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy has been reported as boost therapy with external beam radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma in only three prospective studies. As primary therapy alone without conventional external beam radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma patients, stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy has been reported in only one prospective study. There were only three prospective series and two retrospective studies reported for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with malignant glioma, there is Level I-III evidence that the use of radiosurgery boost followed by external beam radiotherapy and BCNU does not confer benefit in terms of overall survival, local brain control, or quality of life as compared with external beam radiotherapy and BCNU. The use of radiosurgery boost is associated with increased toxicity. For patients with malignant glioma, there is insufficient evidence regarding the benefits/harms of using radiosurgery at the time progression or recurrence. There is also insufficient evidence regarding the benefits/harms in the use of stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed or progressive/recurrent malignant glioma.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The impact of whole-brain radiation therapy on the long-term control and morbidity of patients surviving more than one year after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To better analyze how whole-brain radiotherapy (WBXRT) affects long-term tumor control and toxicity from the initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, we studied these outcomes in patients who had survived at least 1 year from SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the results of gamma knife radiosurgery for 160 brain metastases in 110 patients who were followed for a median of 18 months (range, 12-122 months) after SRS. Eighty-two patients had a solitary brain metastasis and 28 patients had multiple metastases. Seventy patients (116 tumors) were treated with initial radiosurgery and WBXRT, whereas 40 patients (44 lesions) initially received radiosurgery alone. Median treatment volume was 1.9 cc in the entire group, 2.3 cc in the WBXRT group, and 1.6 cc in the SRS alone group. Median tumor dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-21 Gy). RESULTS: At 1, 3, and 5 years, local tumor control was 84.1% +/- 5.5%, 68.6% +/- 8.7%, and 68.6% +/- 8.7% with SRS alone compared with 93.1% +/- 2.4%, 87.7% +/- 4.9%, and 65.7% +/- 10.2%. with concurrent WBXRT and SRS (p = 0.0228, univariate). We found that WBXRT improved local control in patient subsets tumor volume > or =2 cc, peripheral dose < or =16 Gy, single metastases, nonradioresistant tumors, and lung cancer metastases (p = 0.0069, 0.0080, 0.0083, 0.0184, and 0.0348). Distal intracranial failure developed at 1, 3, and 5 years in 26.0% +/- 7.1%, 74.5% +/- 9.4%, and 74.5% +/- 9.4% with SRS alone compared with 20.7% +/- 4.9%, 49.0% +/- 8.7%, and 61.8% +/- 12.8% with concurrent WBXRT and SRS (p = 0.0657). We found a trend for improved distal intracranial control with WBXRT for only nonradioresistant tumors (p = 0.054). Postradiosurgery complications developed in 2.8% +/- 1.2% and 10.7% +/- 3.5% at 1 and 3-5 years and was unaffected by WBXRT (p = 0.7721). WBXRT did not improve survival in the entire series (p = 0.5027) or in any subsets. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of 1-year survivors of SRS for brain metastases, the addition of concurrent WBXRT to SRS was associated with an improved local control rate in patient subsets with tumor volume > or =2 cc, peripheral dose < or =16 Gy, single metastases, nonradioresistant tumors, and specifically lung cancer metastases. A trend was noted for improved distal intracranial control for patients having nonradioresistant tumors. Distant intracranial relapse >1 year posttreatment is a significant problem with or without initial WBXRT.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The characterization of tumor apoptosis after experimental radiosurgery.

We sought to evaluate whether radiosurgery induces apoptosis in an experimental glioma model and to elucidate the time course of this radiobiologic phenomenon. Fischer 344 rats harboring established intracranial 9L gliosarcomas underwent radiosurgery (n = 42) or no radiosurgery (n = 45). Animals were sacrificed at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 h, and 1 or 2 weeks after treatment and in situ tumor apoptosis was assessed by specific staining. Tumor apoptosis was noted to be statistically higher in radiosurgery-treated animals relative to controls at the 6-, 24-, and 48-hour time points following radiosurgery. Radiosurgery induces apoptosis in the rat intracranial 9L gliosarcoma in a time-dependent fashion. The time course of this radiobiologic phenomenon begins at approximately 6 h following radiosurgery, continues up to 48 h, and begins to decline by 72 h.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Radiosurgery for dural arteriovenous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) comprise 10% to 15% of all arteriovenous malformations. Recent studies have demonstrated promising results when radiosurgery is used for DAVFs. We retrospectively analyzed our patients with DAVFs who received stereotactic radiosurgery with or without embolization. METHODS: Between 1991 and 2002, 18 patients with 23 angiographically confirmed symptomatic DAVFs underwent gamma knife radiosurgery, either alone (n = 8) or in combination with embolization (n = 10). A retrospective chart review was performed to identify DAVF location, venous drainage pattern, radiosurgery dosimetry, clinical outcomes, and imaging results. The series included 9 men and 9 women with a mean age of 65 (range 50-89) years. Nine patients received particulate, coil, and/or absolute ethanol embolization before radiosurgery, and 1 patient received particulate embolization after radiosurgery. The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 43 (range 2-116) months. The mean margin radiosurgery dose was 20 (range 15-30) Gy. RESULTS: Nine patients had complete resolution of their presenting symptoms, and 9 patients had resolution of all but 1 of their presenting symptoms. Angiographic follow-up (mean 46 months) was performed on 8 patients demonstrating complete obliteration in all the cases. Seven patients evaluated by magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomography angiography showed no evidence of DAVF (4 patients) or decreased DAVF size (3 patients). After radiosurgery, 1 patient developed a temporary hemiparesis. Two permanent neurological deficits occurred after embolization before radiosurgery. No patient had an intracranial hemorrhage after treatment. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiosurgery provides effective long-term relief of symptoms in selected patients with DAVFs.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Radiosurgery with or without whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: the patients' perspective regarding complications.

INTRODUCTION: When cancer spreads to the brain, patients and their families report a much reduced quality of life. Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and/or radiosurgery (RS) are mainstays of management for patients with metastatic brain cancer. Despite the ubiquity of this problem, little is known about the patients' perspective regarding management-related complications. To assess the patients' perspective regarding current therapeutic options, we retrospectively surveyed 200 consecutive patients who underwent radiosurgery with or without WBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The survey consisted of 10 questions that sought information on quality of life, employment status, side effects (hair loss, fatigue, memory, concentration, mood, or employment), activity level, and satisfaction. RESULTS: We tabulated 104 responses (52%). WBRT was used in 69% (72 of 104); all patients had radiosurgery. After WBRT, the following were noted: hair loss (88%; total regrowth in 24%), excess fatigue (95%), problems with short-term memory (72%), long-term memory (33%), concentration (61%), and depression (54%). Sixty-three percent of patients who had WBRT thought they had side effects after treatment compared with 34% who had radiosurgery only (P <0.001). Only 5% of RS patients reported fatigue. Seventy-six percent and 56% of respondents considered RS or WBRT, respectively, a good treatment of them (P = 0.25). Only 26 patients (27%) were employed at the time of treatment and 16 remained employed (62%). Eighteen percent believed that WBRT delayed other cancer treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with brain metastases often report complications of their disease or its treatment. Side effects are most pronounced in those who received WBRT. Radiosurgery had fewer reported side effects and was believed by more patients or families to be effective. Further study of clinical outcomes and quality of life is important to guide our management of patients with these common brain tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Neurotransplantation for patients with subcortical motor stroke: a phase 2 randomized trial.

OBJECT: No definitive treatment exists to restore lost brain function following a stroke. Transplantation of cultured neuronal cells has been shown to be safe and effective in animal models of stroke and safe in a Phase 1 human trial. In the present study the authors tested the usefulness of human neuron transplantation followed by participation in a 2-month stroke rehabilitation program compared with rehabilitation alone in patients with substantial fixed motor deficits associated with a basal ganglia stroke. METHODS: Human neuronal cells (LBS-Neurons; Layton BioScience, Inc.) were delivered frozen and then thawed and formulated on the morning of surgery. The entry criteria in this randomized, observer-blinded trial of 18 patients included age between 18 and 75 years, completed stroke duration of 1 to 6 years, presence of a fixed motor deficit that was stable for at least 2 months, and no contraindications to stereotactic surgery. Patients were randomized at two centers to receive either 5 or 10 million implanted cells in 25 sites (seven patients per group) followed by participation in a stroke rehabilitation program, or to serve as a nonsurgical control group (rehabilitation only; four patients). The surgical techniques used were the same at both centers. All patients underwent extensive pre- and postoperative motor testing and imaging. Patients received cyclosporine A for 1 week before and 6 months after surgery. The primary efficacy measure was a change in the European Stroke Scale (ESS) motor score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included Fugl-Meyer, Action Research Arm Test, and Stroke Impact Scale scores, as well as the results of other motor tests. Nine strokes were ischemic in origin and nine were hemorrhagic. All 14 patients who underwent surgery (ages 40-70 years) underwent uncomplicated surgeries. Serial evaluations (maximum duration 24 months) demonstrated no cell-related adverse serological or imaging-defined effects. One patient suffered a single seizure, another had a syncopal event, and in another there was burr-hole drainage of an asymptomatic chronic subdural hematoma. Four of seven patients who received 5 million cells (mean improvement 6.9 points) and two of seven who received 10 million cells had improved ESS scores at 6 months; however, there was no significant change in the ESS motor score in patients who received cell implants (p = 0.756) compared with control or baseline values (p = 0.06). Compared with baseline, wrist movement and hand movement scores recorded on the Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment instrument were not improved (p = 0.06). The Action Research Arm Test gross hand-movement scores improved compared with control (p = 0.017) and baseline (p = 0.001) values. On the Stroke Impact Scale, the 6-month daily activities score changed compared with baseline (p = 0.045) but not control (p = 0.056) scores, and the Everyday Memory test score improved in comparison with baseline (p = 0.004) values. CONCLUSIONS: Human neuronal cells can be produced in culture and implanted stereotactically into the brains of patients with motor deficits due to stroke. Although a measurable improvement was noted in some patients and this translated into improved activities of daily living in some patients as well, this study did not find evidence of a significant benefit in motor function as determined by the primary outcome measure. This experimental trial indicates the safety and feasibility of neuron transplantation for patients with motor stroke.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Multivariate analysis of survival, local control, and time to distant metastases in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and chemotherapy have recently improved lung cancer management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed outcomes in 68 patients with unresectable stage I-III non-small-cell lung cancer. Treatment consisted of 3D CRT alone or with concurrent chemotherapy (CCR). RESULTS: Concurrent chemotherapy improved survival, to a median of 17 months +/- 4.9 months, compared with 8 months+/- 4.1 months for the radiation therapy (RT) alone group (P=0.0347). The 2- and 5-year survival rates were 40.3%+/-7.7% and 14.1%+/-6.4%, respectively, with CCR, compared with 19.6%+/- 9.6% and 0, respectively, for RT alone. In a subgroup analysis for age > 65, patients who received CCR (n=20) had significantly improved survival and local control (P=0.005 and P=0.0286, respectively). Acute esophageal toxicity Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade >or= 3 was significantly higher in the CCR group and correlated with the RT dose (19% in CCR vs. 0 in RT, P=0.0234; P=0.050). The overall incidences of esophageal and pulmonary toxicity grade >or= 3 were 20.6% and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that CCR is associated with improved survival over RT alone, with a tolerable increase in acute toxicity.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Radiosurgery of vestibular schwannomas: summary of experience in 829 cases.

OBJECT: Management options for vestibular schwannomas (VSs) have greatly expanded since the introduction of stereotactic radiosurgery. Optimal outcomes reflect long-term tumor control, preservation of cranial nerve function, and retention of quality of life. The authors review their 15-year experience. METHODS: Between 1987 and 2002, some 829 patients with VSs underwent gamma knife surgery (GKS). Dose selection, imaging, and dose planning techniques evolved between 1987 and 1992 but thereafter remained stable for 10 years. The average tumor volume was 2.5 cm3. The median margin dose to the tumor was 13 Gy (range 10-20 Gy). No patient sustained significant perioperative morbidity. The average duration of hospital stay was less than 1 day. Unchanged hearing preservation was possible in 50 to 77% of patients (up to 90% in those with intracanalicular tumors). Facial neuropathy risks were reduced to less than 1%. Trigeminal symptoms were detected in less than 3% of patients whose tumors reached the level of the trigeminal nerve. Tumor control rates at 10 years were 97% (no additional treatment needed). CONCLUSIONS: Superior imaging, multiple isocenter volumetric conformal dose planning, and optimal precision and dose delivery contributed to the long-term success of GKS, including in those patients in whom initial microsurgery had failed. Gamma knife surgery provides a low risk, minimally invasive treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed or residual VS. Cranial nerve preservation and quality of life maintenance are possible in long-term follow up.

Female↗
PubMed2004

Acoustic neuroma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy.

PURPOSE: To define tumor control and clinical outcomes of radiosurgery to marginal tumor doses of 12-13 Gy for unilateral acoustic neuroma patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three hundred thirteen patients with previously untreated unilateral acoustic neuromas (vestibular schwannomas) underwent gamma knife radiosurgery between February 1991 and February 2001 with marginal tumor doses of 12-13 Gy (median, 13 Gy). Median follow-up was 24 months (maximum, 115 months; 36 patients with > or =60 months). Maximum doses were 20-26 Gy (median, 26 Gy), and treatment volumes were 0.04-21.4 mL (median, 1.1 mL). RESULTS: The actuarial 6-year clinical tumor control rate (no requirement for surgical intervention) for the entire series was 98.6 +/- 1.1%. Two patients required tumor resection; one had a complete resection for solid tumor growth and one required partial resection for an enlarging adjacent subarachnoid cyst. Six-year actuarial rates for preservation of facial nerve function, normal trigeminal nerve function, unchanged hearing level, and useful hearing were 100%, 95.6 +/- 1.8%, 70.3 +/- 5.8%, and 78.6 +/- 5.1%, respectively. The risk of developing trigeminal neuropathy correlated with increasing tumor volume (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Acoustic neuroma radiosurgery with doses of 12-13 Gy provides high rates of tumor control and cranial nerve preservation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The expanding role of neurosurgeons in the management of brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are the most common type of intracranial tumor. Until recently, whole brain fractionated radiation therapy (WBRT) was the mainstay of treatment, thereby confining the role of neurosurgeons to resection of an occasional solitary, accessible, and symptomatic brain metastasis. Median survival after surgery and radiation typically ranged from 5 to 11 months. METHODS: We analyzed various demographic incidence reports and our series of brain metastasis patients treated with radiosurgery. During a 15-year interval (1987-2002), radiosurgery was performed on 5,032 patients of whom 1,088 (21.6%) had metastatic brain tumors. RESULTS: In the United States, 266,820 to 533,640 new cases of brain metastases will be diagnosed in the year 2003. Evidence to date demonstrates that radiosurgery provides effective local tumor control for brain metastases. Important prognostic factors affecting patient survival include the absence of active systemic disease, the patient's preoperative performance status, age, and the number of metastases. Survival and local tumor control rates attained with radiosurgery are superior to those of either conventional surgery or WBRT. The morbidity associated with radiosurgery of brain metastasis is very low, and the mortality rate approaches zero. CONCLUSIONS: Compelling evidence indicates that radiosurgery is an effective neurosurgical management strategy for intracranial brain metastases. Quite often, favorable tumor control and survival can be achieved without WBRT. With radiosurgery as a therapeutic option, neurosurgeons now have a vastly expanded armamentarium for treatment of patients with brain metastases. The large number of patients with brain metastases who require care by a neurosurgeon for optimal treatment has significant implications for both the patterns of neurosurgical training and practice in the United States.

Brain Neoplasms↗