A historical overview of psychiatric/mental health nursing education in the United Kingdom: going around in circles or on the straight and narrow?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to John Cutcliffe.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom (UK) and elsewhere throughout the world, the policy and legal frameworks that surround the provision of mental health care are becoming increasingly coercive. For example, emerging mental health policy in the UK includes a commitment to the introduction of compulsory treatment in the community. AIMS: In this paper, our aims are: to explore the context in which this more coercive mental health policy has arisen in the UK; to challenge the assumptions and the evidence that lie behind the introduction of proposed new mental health policies; and to consider the impact that a more coercive policy is likely to have on the practice of mental health nursing. DISCUSSION: In the UK, representatives of central government have declared that 'care in the community has failed'. This view has been reinforced by media representations of mental health issues. Policy documents have drawn attention to the risks posed by people with mental illnesses. Correspondingly, proposed initiatives emphasize the need to more closely 'manage' people with mental health problems, and set out a new legislative and policy framework to achieve this. We question the assumptions and evidence that underlie these planned new developments. We argue that, contrary to government assertions, there is no unequivocal evidence that 'community care' has failed. We observe, too, that people with mental health difficulties are often amongst the most vulnerable members of society. Finally, we consider the impact that a more coercive policy framework will have on the work of mental health nurses, and argue that the shift towards a more 'controlling' role is likely to run counter to what many nurses see as the 'core' of their work.
This article is the second in a series of six that explores the nature of hope, reviews the existing theoretical and empirical work in several discrete areas of nursing, and provides case studies to illustrate the role that hope plays in clinical situations. In this article we focus on hope within the formal area of psychiatric/mental health nursing. The article points out that there is a limited empirical literature covering several aspects and issues of hope, hopelessness and hope inspiration within the domain of psychiatry. However, despite these studies many questions still remain unanswered. The bulk of this empirical literature focuses on hopelessness, and in the main hopelessness associated with suicide/depression. As a result of these investigations, a range of interventions has been identified for inspiring hope in different client groups with mental health problems, and a summary of these is given. Importantly, however, the basic social process of hope inspiration for each of these client groups is fundamentally the same, in that the process remains subtle, unobtrusive and associated with the therapy/relationship. We conclude by indicating key areas/questions for future research, and raise key questions regarding future policy/education issues.
This article offers an examination of the mental health nursing articles published in the British Journal of Nursing during the last 10 years, and a commentary on how these reflect developments within this specialism. It identifies a number of clinical and professional issues, which have emerged over the last decade, including: community care; concerns over the quality of acute inpatient services; clinical supervision; and the integration of schools of nursing into higher education. Finally, the article identifies some clinical areas which it suggests warrant attention in the next decade such as child and adolescent mental health and mental health care for older people.