PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John D Fanburg

Publications and source records attributed to John D Fanburg.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Issues in physician contracting.

Dermatologists will enter into a number of different contracts during their professional careers. It is important that in each agreement they enter, dermatologists reap the benefits that they aspire for and understand the consequences of each provision. This article addresses just a few of the different issues that arise in physician contracting, such as choosing the appropriate form of business entity; the importance of a writing; term and termination of the contract; compensation models; benefits, vacation and other time off included in the contract; malpractice insurance; and restrictive covenants. Each provision should be carefully analyzed to ensure that it will protect the best interests of the dermatologist in that situation.

Contracts↗

Unpaid radiology claims in New Jersey: incidence and financial implications.

OBJECTIVE: Nonpayment of claims by insurers may lead to major financial losses by physicians. These losses may far exceed the losses from late payment that we studied previously, although it is late payment that has been the primary focus of legislation enacted in 47 states. This article quantifies the loss to radiologists from nonpayment of claims submitted to payers on behalf of patients with insurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed all claims (48,217) submitted in February, June, and October 2000 to six major payers by a common third-party billing company on behalf of 11 radiology practices in New Jersey. Claims were categorized as unpaid (unpaid > 170 days after submission), paid timely (within 40 days of submission, the criterion of the New Jersey Prompt-Pay Act, effective December 28, 1999), or paid late (40-170 days after submission). A detailed analysis of 5,638 claims from the practice of two of the authors was used to estimate a "clean claims" (claims without defect or need for substantiation) submission rate. RESULTS: The revenue loss from unpaid claims was approximately $156,000, which was 28 times the loss of interest that should, according to law, have been paid on the delayed paid claims. Of the unpaid claims, the payers never disputed 68%, involving approximately $106,000. CONCLUSION: The financial consequences of unpaid claims far exceed those associated with late payment, even omitting all unpaid claims that were disputed by payers. Legislation coupled with active enforcement should address this large problem of unpaid claims, which is many times larger than the already legislatively targeted problem of late payment.

Health Maintenance Organizations↗

Compliance with prompt payment legislation: the initial experiences of New Jersey radiologists.

OBJECTIVE: Prompt payment has emerged as a dominant issue in managed care reform, with 47 states passing laws or regulations requiring prompt remuneration for medical services. The New Jersey Prompt-Pay Act, effective on December 28, 1999, requires payment within 30 days of electronic submission and within 40 days for nonelectronic submission. This study was undertaken to assess compliance with the New Jersey Prompt-Pay Act for radiology claims submitted 1 and 5 months after implementation (7-11 months after passage of the statute). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective prompt payment analysis was undertaken of all claims submitted in February and June 2000 to six major payers by a common third-party billing company on behalf of 11 radiology practices of various sizes, settings, and locations in New Jersey. A total of 33,537 claims were assigned to one of six time periods on the basis of timeliness of payment: less than or equal to 30 days, 31-40 days, 41-50 days, 51-60 days, 61-90 days, and greater than 90 days or a separate unpaid category after 170 days had elapsed. A detailed analysis of 3156 claims from one practice was performed to estimate a clean claims submission rate. RESULTS: The overall percentage of claims paid within 40 days was 70%. After 170 days, the overall percentage of paid claims was 93%. The annualized interest lost on delayed payments was $23,939 for the practice analyzed. CONCLUSION: Prompt payment for radiology services remains an elusive goal in New Jersey, despite passage and implementation of prompt payment legislation.

Guideline Adherence↗