PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John G Mastronarde

Publications and source records attributed to John G Mastronarde.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Predicting episodes of poor asthma control in treated patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma exacerbations are dangerous, expensive, and difficult to anticipate. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with asthma who had asthma episodes and exacerbations during 4 weeks of observation. METHODS: A total of 2032 volunteers with asthma (age, 3-64 years; 62% female subjects) were studied over two 2-week intervals after flu vaccine and placebo. Baseline data, including several asthma questionnaires, were analyzed for prediction of subsequent asthma events as recorded on diaries detailing peak flow, medication use, and health care use. RESULTS: During 28 days of diary collection, 43.2% of participants had at least 1 episode of poor asthma control. Most episodes were characterized by increased use of rescue medications or reductions in peak flow, but nearly 15% of participants had exacerbations characterized by use of systemic corticosteroids, unscheduled health care visits, or both. Episode frequency was highest in children <10 years of age. Additional risk factors were smoking, African American ethnicity, low lung function, and past history of severe asthma. The best predictors were symptom questionnaires, and a simple questionnaire concerning the preceding 2 weeks worked as well as more complex questionnaires or those reflecting longer periods. In regression analyses, questionnaire results, smoking, lung function, ethnicity, and asthma history all were associated with asthma episodes in people older than 10 years, whereas only asthma history was predictive in those <10 years. CONCLUSION: Symptom questionnaires are predictive of subsequent asthma episodes in people older than age 10 years, but not in younger people. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Simple assessments may be helpful in identifying patients most at risk for future asthma episodes.

Adolescent↗

Survey of current practices in fellowship orientation.

BACKGROUND: The transition from medical resident to subspecialty fellow is a critical time period in fellowship training that has not been well described. The current practices of fellow orientation in pulmonary and critical care training programs are not known. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe orientation practices for training programs in the United States. METHODS: A 10-question survey was sent via e-mail to program directors of pulmonary/critical care fellowship programs identified on the American Thoracic Society (ATS) web-page of current programs. RESULTS: Eighty-seven programs responded (61.7%), of which 86% had a formal orientation program. The mean time spent in fellow orientation was 5-10 h in didactic sessions and 0-5 h in wet labs. The most frequent didactic sessions were bronchoscopy in 69 programs (80.2%), pulmonary function testing in 63 programs (73.3%) and orientation to hospital services in 63 programs (73.3%). The most frequent use of wet labs was in bronchoscopy training in 60 programs (81.1%) and ventilators in 45 programs (60.8%). Simulators were used in 37 programs (43%). The majority reported that these areas were covered with on the job training, without a formal designated orientation. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated that early fellow training differs across programs in both time spent and clinical and procedural topics covered. An early, standardized approach to clinical and procedural training can assure appropriate exposure that cannot be guaranteed by on the job training. To provide justification for such an approach, clinical outcomes need to be correlated with training methods.

Bronchoscopy↗

FEV1/FVC ratio of 70% misclassifies patients with obstruction at the extremes of age.

BACKGROUND: The American Thoracic Society recommends using the lower limit of normal (LLN) method to diagnose obstructive lung disease. However, few studies have investigated the clinical relevance of these recommendations. We compared the LLN derived from available data sets to a fixed ratio (FEV1/FVC, < 75% or 70%) and also to the FEV1/FVC percent predicted ratio to determine the impact of changing the FEV1/FVC "cutoff" on the spirometric diagnosis of obstructive lung disease. METHODS: FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, age, race, sex, height, and weight were recorded from 1,503 pulmonary function tests. Predicted values were calculated using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Study data set (Hankinson), and reference values from studies by Crapo, Knudson, and Morris. In addition, the LLN of the FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated for the Hankinson and Crapo reference values. RESULTS: The number of studies interpreted as obstructed varied from 37% using the Hankinson data set to 55% using the 75% fixed ratio method. Comparing the LLN method vs the 70% fixed ratio method resulted in 7.5% (Hankinson LLN vs 70% fixed) and 6.9% (Crapo LLN vs 70% fixed), which were discordant results. Age was the strongest predictor of discordance, and 16% of subjects > 74 years of age had discordant results comparing Hankinson values to the 70% fixed method. CONCLUSION: At the extremes of age and height, a large number of spirometry test results will be interpreted as showing an obstructive defect if a 70% fixed ratio method is used for interpretation compared with the LLN derived from the Hankinson data set.

Adolescent↗

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) describes airway narrowing that occurs in association with exercise. EIB occurs in up to 90% of asthmatic patients and is estimated to occur in > 10% of the general population. Recent reviews have identified asthma as a risk factor for sudden death and have reported many deaths that have been attributed directly to EIB. We present a review of the literature related to EIB in athletes including sections discussing its pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, and which athletes are most at risk for experiencing EIB.

Adolescent↗

Differences in the evaluation and management of exercise-induced bronchospasm between family physicians and pulmonologists.

Previous studies have demonstrated that specialists and generalists differ in the evaluation and management of asthma especially in terms of use of objective testing. We speculated that there also may be differences in the diagnosis and management of exercise-induced respiratory complaints. An Internet survey was sent to samples of pulmonologists and family physicians. Our data suggests that pulmonologists are much more likely to order bronchoprovocation testing than family physicians, and family physicians are more likely to start any empiric therapy than perform bronchoprovocation testing when exercise-induced bronchospasm is suspected. These differences may lead to inaccurate or missed diagnoses and unnecessary morbidity.

Asthma, Exercise-Induced↗