PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John J Mulcahy

Publications and source records attributed to John J Mulcahy.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Current use of penile implants in erectile dysfunction.

Penile implants became popular with the introduction of effective models more than 30 years ago. Today they play a secondary but definitive role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction at times when more conservative therapies have failed. Improvements in reducing the incidence of infection, treating infection with antiseptic washes, enhancing device longevity, and instituting new techniques to manage complicated implantation procedures have made them more acceptable to patients. Although penile implants are the least often chosen and most invasive treatment for erectile dysfunction, they have the highest satisfaction rate--in the range of 80% to 90%--among both patients and partners.

Erectile Dysfunction↗
PubMed2006

Upsizing of inflatable penile implant cylinders in patients with corporal fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis in a patient with scarred corporal bodies secondary to priapism or removal of a previously infected implant is a formidable surgical challenge; use of downsized implants has improved chances of successful reimplantation. Nevertheless, patients are frequently dissatisfied with the resulting short penises. AIM: This study investigates the use of downsized inflatable penile prosthesis cylinders as tissue expanders in patients with corporal fibrosis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Corporal length and width were calibrated before implantation of downsized prostheses and after 1 year of their use as tissue expanders. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients had insertion of Mentor Narrow Base (18), AMS CXM (9), or AMS CXR (10) into scarred corporal bodies. Etiology was previously infected and removed implant (29) or priapism (8). In each of these cases it was not possible to dilate to 12 mm in order to place standard-sized cylinders. Patients were encouraged to inflate their implant for up to 3 hours daily. After several months intracorporal stretching occurred. The patients were reoperated; corporal length and width were recalibrated. RESULTS: Upon reoperation, it was possible to pass dilators of 12 mm width proximally allowing the substitution of standard-sized AMS 700 CX (23), Mentor Alpha 1 (10), or Mentor Titan (2). Additionally, corporal length measurements in the previously infected patients increased an average of 2.2 cm allowing placement of longer cylinders. Although priapism patients did not show this phenomenon of corporal lengthening, the implant space widened enough to permit replacement with standard-size cylinders improving girth, rigidity, and appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Wider and sometimes longer cylinders can be substituted in patients with corporal fibrosis that required implantation with downsized cylinders because of fibrotic corpora. Prolonged inflation over an 8- to 12-month period results in expansion of the cylinder cavity, permitting standard-sized cylinders in all patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The penile implant for erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Penile prostheses, introduced as the first effective organic treatment for erectile dysfunction over three decades ago, have an important role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction when other nonprosthetic treatment options have proven unsatisfactory. Although they are the least chosen and most invasive treatment option, they have the highest satisfaction rate of all available ED options and provide a predictable and reliable result. AIM: To provide recommendations/guidelines concerning state-of-the-art knowledge for utilization of the penile prosthesis in the management of men with erectile dysfunction. METHODS: An International Consultation in collaboration with the major sexual medicine associations assembled over 200 multidisciplinary experts from 60 countries into 17 committees. Committee members established specific objectives and scopes for various sexual medicine topics. The recommendations concerning state-of-the-art knowledge in the respective sexual medicine topic represent the opinion of experts from five continents developed in a process over a 2-year period. There were 10 experts from seven countries concerning the Penile Implant for Erectile Dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert opinion was based on grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation and debate. RESULTS: Recommendations/guidelines for penile prosthesis (hydraulic, semi-rigid and soft silicone) insertion for management of men with erectile dysfunction were updated. Consensed issues included: criteria for patient selection, informed consent procedures, strategies for preoperative preparation, operative incisions/technical considerations and outcome results in terms of patient satisfaction and device survival. Updated information was reviewed concerning therapies for device failures, device insertion in scarred corporal bodies and strategies for managing implant infections. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more research in developing management strategies for insertion of penile prostheses in men with ED.

Consensus↗
PubMed2002

Salvage procedure for infected noneroded artificial urinary sphincters.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with removal, antiseptic irrigation and immediate reimplantation of infected noneroded artificial urinary sphincters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1996 to October 2000, 8 patients with an infected artificial urinary sphincter underwent a total of 9 salvage operations. All patients underwent cystoscopy before salvage to ensure nonerosion of the sphincter cuff. All previously implanted material was removed, the wounds were copiously irrigated according to a 7 solution protocol and an identical new system was implanted. All patients were discharged home the following morning on oral antibiotics. RESULTS: Followup was 5 to 66 months (mean 33). The predominant organisms cultured at salvage were gram-positive cocci. Time from implantation to salvage was from 2 weeks to 64 months (mean 13.7 months). Prostatectomy was the etiology of incontinence in all except 1 case. In 5 of the 8 men a double cuff system was placed and 3 underwent concurrent 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis salvage. The salvage procedure was done twice in 1 patient 5 months apart. The system was removed 16 months later secondary to urethral erosion. At the most recent followup the other 7 patients were free of infection with a functioning artificial urinary sphincter. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage and immediate reimplantation of an infected, noneroded single or double cuff artificial urinary sphincter appears to be a valid option. Our overall success rate was 87%. The usual offending organisms are gram-positive skin flora. An associated inflatable penile prosthesis does not prohibit simultaneous salvage of the 2 devices.

Adult↗