Biomedical subjects

John J V McMurray

Publications and source records attributed to John J V McMurray.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Finerenone and quality of life in heart failure: component-level analyses and clinical relevance of the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire.

AIMS: Finerenone was shown to improve overall health status, as measured by the aggregate 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF). This study aimed to contextualize KCCQ changes in a manner that is relevant to patients and clinicians, thereby improving understanding of this metric in HFmrEF/HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prespecified analysis of FINEARTS-HF, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in HFmrEF/HFpEF, we performed exploratory assessments of treatment effects on mean score changes from baseline to 12 months for each of the 23 KCCQ components (scaled from 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) using multivariable linear regression. We further compared the impact of finerenone on the KCCQ-overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) at 12 months with the expected decline per year. Of 6001 participants in FINEARTS-HF, 5006 completed the KCCQ both at baseline and 12 months (age: 72 ± 10 years, women: 45%, baseline KCCQ-OSS: 63.9 ± 22.0). Finerenone, compared with placebo, numerically improved all but one KCCQ component, with the greatest nominal improvement observed in lower limb oedema frequency (+2.5, 95% CI: 0.9-4.1), fatigue burden (+2.2, 95% CI: 0.9-3.5), fatigue frequency (+2.1, 95% CI: 0.7-3.6), and lower limb oedema burden (+1.8, 95% CI: 0.6-2.9). KCCQ-OSS at 12 months was inversely related to age, with finerenone shifting the age-KCCQ-OSS relationship by 4.7 (95% CI: 0.4-9.1) years. CONCLUSIONS: In FINEARTS-HF, finerenone was associated with modest improvements in health status-most notably lower limb oedema and fatigue-in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Geographic Variation in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the FINEARTS-HF Trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

clinical trials↗

PubMed2026

EMPEROR-Preserved Risk Model and Outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF Trial: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved EF (HFpEF) show substantial heterogeneity in prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of biomarker-driven prognostic models derived from the Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (EMPEROR-Preserved) Trial in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to examine whether baseline risk modified the therapeutic effect of finerenone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prespecified secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial, which was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries among adults aged 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF (LVEF) of 40% or greater. Patients were randomized between September 2020 and January 2023, and data analysis for this study was conducted from September to October 2025. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 32 (23-37) months. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: EMPEROR-Preserved risk scores for the outcomes of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were calculated in FINEARTS-HF using models incorporating N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, New York Heart Association functional class, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes, insulin use, and-depending on outcome-age, hemoglobin and albumin levels, HF duration, time from prior HF hospitalization, and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor use. Estimated risks were compared with observed event rates, and model performance was assessed using Harrell C statistic. Treatment effects were evaluated across risk quintiles (Q1 to Q5) and across the continuous risk distribution. RESULTS: Among 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 2732 [45.5%] women; 3003 randomized to finerenone and 2998 randomized to placebo), the EMPEROR-Preserved risk model estimated risk of outcomes, with Q5 vs Q1 hazard ratios (HRs) of 10.49 (95% CI, 8.14-13.52) for the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death and 13.47 (95% CI, 8.79-20.64) for cardiovascular death. The model demonstrated good discrimination. The treatment effect of finerenone was consistent across risk quintiles for first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (Q1: HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.58-1.49]; Q2: HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.76-1.43]; Q3: HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.62-1.07]; Q4: HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.65-1.01]; and Q5: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.74-1.05]; P for interaction = .68) and remained uniform across the continuous risk spectrum. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The EMPEROR-Preserved risk models demonstrated good performance in FINEARTS-HF. Baseline risk did not modify the relative treatment effect of finerenone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of Finerenone on Heart Failure Outcomes According to Baseline Heart Failure Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

chronic kidney disease↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of the Kidney Function-Based Finerenone Dosing Strategy Used in FINEARTS-HF.

BACKGROUND: Given that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have the potential to impair renal function and induce hyperkalemia, close monitoring of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum potassium levels is essential to ensure the safe administration of this therapy. OBJECTIVES: In this prespecified analysis, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of the kidney function-based finerenone dosing strategy used in the FINEARTS-HF trial. METHODS: In FINEARTS-HF, patients with an eGFR of 25 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline were stratified at randomization to the low-dose group and started on 10 mg of finerenone once daily (titrated to a maximum 20 mg/d) or matching placebo, whereas those with an eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline were stratified to the high-dose group and started on 20 mg of finerenone once daily (titrated to a maximum 40 mg/d) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the composite of total (first and recurrent) heart failure events and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Among 5,986 (99.8%) analyzable patients, 3,159 were assigned to the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum and 2,827 to the lower eGFR/low-dose stratum group. The mean ± SD achieved dose was 32.3 ± 9.1 mg (finerenone) and 34.4 ± 7.8 mg (placebo) in the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum, and 15.6 ± 4.3 mg (finerenone) and 16.7 ± 4.0 mg (placebo) in the lower eGFR/low-dose stratum. The effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent across the 2 dosing strata (higher eGFR/high-dose stratum: rate ratio: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94] vs lower eGFR/low-dose stratum: rate ratio: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.74-1.03]; P for interaction = 0.34). Consistent benefits were observed for the components of the primary outcome and all-cause death. Safety was also consistent between dosing strata, except for hypokalemia, where the reduction in the odds of hypokalemia with finerenone compared to placebo was greater in the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum (P-interaction < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In FINEARTS-HF, an eGFR-based dosing strategy allowed effective and safe use of finerenone in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction/ heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with a baseline eGFR as low as 25 mL/min/1.73 m2. We recommend that clinicians implement the trial-validated dosing strategy and incorporate appropriate uptitration to the target dose to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. (FINEARTS-HF [Study to Evaluate the Efficacy (Effect on Disease) and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke) Greater or Equal to 40%; NCT04435626).

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Lactate Dehydrogenase and Outcomes in Patients With HF and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From GALACTIC-HF.

BACKGROUND: Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a cytoplasmic enzyme found in most cells. Increased LDH levels are a nonspecific measure of cellular injury and may be prognostically important in heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the relationship between LDH and clinical characteristics and outcomes in heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: Using data from GALACTIC-HF, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) in patients with HFrEF, the relationship between LDH and clinical outcomes was analyzed. The incremental value of LDH added to a validated prognostic model (PREDICT-HF) was also calculated using Harrell's C statistic, integrated discrimination index (IDI), and net reclassification index (NRI). RESULTS: In GALACTIC-HF, baseline LDH data were available for 8,179 patients, including 6,138 outpatients. Patients with higher LDH were more frequently female and had worse HF status. They were also more likely to have elevated serum creatinine, liver enzymes, creatine kinase, NT-proBNP, and high-sensitivity troponin I. Compared with patients in the lowest LDH (Q1: 155 U/L [25th-75th percentile: 144-163 U/L]), the HRs for the primary outcome (first HF event or cardiovascular death) were Q2: 183 U/L (25th-75th percentile: 177-188 U/L); HR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.02-1.31]; Q3: 207 U/L (25th-75th percentile: 201-215 U/L); HR: 1.39 [95% CI: 1.23-1.58]; and Q4: 253 U/L (25th-75th percentile: 236-280 U/L); HR: 1.84 [95% CI: 1.62-2.08], respectively. Even after adjustment, elevated LDH remained independently associated with higher HR. When added to the PREDICT-HF risk model, baseline LDH improved Harrell's C statistic, IDI, and NRI for the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In GALACTIC-HF, higher LDH levels were independently associated with a higher risk of clinical outcomes in HFrEF. (Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure [GALACTIC-HF]; NCT02929329; EudraCT number: 2016-002299-28).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Subgroups and Special Populations in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: Insights From the HFC-ARC Expert Consensus Panel.

In the evolving landscape of heart failure (HF) management, the identification and analysis of subgroups and special populations within clinical trials are crucial for enhancing clinical decision-making, guiding further research, and understanding heterogeneity in study outcomes. This expert consensus document results from the collaborative efforts of the Heart Failure Collaboratory and the Heart Failure Collaboratory Academic Research Consortium, which brought together stakeholders from academia, industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and patient representatives. The purpose of this assembly was to propose standardized definitions and critical endpoint considerations essential for shaping the design and conduct of clinical trials for drugs and devices in the field of HF. In this context, we propose definitions and endpoints for specific subgroups and special populations in the spectrum of HF. We enhanced the precision, efficacy, and applicability of clinical research and promote more "personalized" approaches to interpretation of clinical trials. Furthermore, we explore the burgeoning field of gene therapy as a promising avenue for addressing the genetic basis of certain cardiomyopathies within these specialized patient groups. We focus especially on methodological considerations for subgroup analyses in large-scale trials, highlighting the importance of proper interpretation of subgroups and best practices for identifying heterogeneity suggestive of differential treatment effects, including when these analyses should be considered hypothesis-generating and requiring subsequent validation. We advocate for a methodical approach to clinical trial design, one that prioritizes the strategic identification of subgroups and employs appropriate statistical methodologies to ensure the reliability and clinical relevance of findings. Through this lens, we envision a pathway toward more personalized and effective treatments for HF, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes by leveraging the insights garnered from meticulously designed and comprehensively analyzed clinical trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone-Related Risk of Hypotension in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone reduces clinical events in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction/preserved ejection fraction; however, the implications of treatment-related hypotension are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated predictors of systolic blood pressure (SBP) <100 mm Hg and investigator-reported hypotension and their associations with randomized treatment and clinical outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke]) trial. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in symptomatic patients with chronic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%). Predictors of SBP <100 mm Hg and hypotension were identified using Cox models. Associations between SBP <100 mm Hg and hypotension, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using time-updated Cox models. The primary outcome was a composite of total heart failure events and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Among the 5,815 participants with available data, post-baseline SBP <100 mm Hg occurred in 899 (538 with finerenone vs 361 with placebo; odds ratio: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.38-1.85) and investigator-reported hypotension in 364 patients (225 with finerenone vs 139 with placebo; odds ratio: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.34-2.08). Participants experiencing SBP <100 mm Hg had lower baseline SBP, were older, had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, a history of smoking, and no diabetes. Treatment-related risk of the primary endpoint was reduced in patients with no/before SBP <100 mm Hg (rate ratio: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.90) and appeared to attenuate afterwards (rate ratio: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.70-1.39), although no formal statistical interaction was observed (Pinteraction = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this prespecified analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial, finerenone led to higher rates of post-baseline SBP <100 mm Hg and investigator-reported hypotension. Although hypotension should not prompt automatic treatment discontinuation, these patients should be carefully monitored. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy (Effect on Disease) and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke) Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF]; NCT04435626).

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone and Cardiovascular Outcomes According to Baseline Kidney Function in Patients With Heart Failure: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone is known to reduce the risk of worsening heart failure (HF) events and cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. OBJECTIVES: The authors explored whether the benefit of finerenone among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction differs according to baseline measures of kidney function. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure) was a global, randomized clinical trial of finerenone vs placebo among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Finerenone was titrated to 20 mg/d if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 40 mg/d if eGFR was >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The authors used a semiparametric proportional rates method, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (<60%; ≥60%) and region, to assess for differential treatment effects on the composite of total HF events and CV death according to the baseline eGFR (continuous and categories [≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, <45 mL/min/1.73 m2] and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) (<30 mg/g, 30 to <300 mg/g, ≥300 mg/g). RESULTS: The effect of finerenone to reduce the primary endpoint of total HF events and CV death did not significantly differ according to baseline eGFR (Pinteraction = 0.14 and 0.07 for continuous and categorical eGFR, respectively) with rate ratio 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.88) for eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.65-1.06) for eGFR 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83-1.26) for eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. The corresponding absolute event rates were 9.2 vs 12.5, 16.5 vs 19.9, and 28.0 vs 28.0 per 100 patient-years for finerenone vs placebo, respectively. Similar results were noted for total worsening HF events. Finerenone lowered the risk of the composite CV outcome similarly across baseline categories of UACR (Pinteraction = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: In the FINEARTS-HF trial (where the target dose of finerenone was determined by baseline kidney function), the effect of finerenone to reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and total HF events did not significantly differ across a range of baseline eGFR and UACR.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Cellular Adhesion Molecules and Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure: Findings From the DAPA-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and intracellular cell adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) are responsible for immune cell-cell interactions. Systemic levels of VCAM-1 are associated with incident heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: To determine if VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 levels are associated with progression of established HF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants enrolled in the biomarker substudy of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) randomized clinical trial had VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 levels measured at baseline and 12 months. The DAPA-HF trial was conducted at 410 sites in 20 countries. Patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV with elevated natriuretic peptides were enrolled between February 15, 2017, and August 17, 2018, with final follow-up on June 6, 2019. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to January 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Dapagliflozin, 10 mg, once daily vs placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the composite of a worsening HF event or cardiovascular death. The associations between VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 levels at baseline and the primary outcome, its components, and all-cause death were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for known prognostic variables including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), as well as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. RESULTS: A total of 3051 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.2 [10.5] years; 2386 male [78.2%]) were included in this study. Mean (SD) follow-up time was 17.6 (5.2) months. The median (IQR) baseline VCAM-1 level was 997 (816.7-1218.8) ng/mL. Compared with patients with lower concentrations of VCAM-1, those with higher concentrations of VCAM-1 were older (mean [SD] age T3 vs T1, 69.7 [9.7] years vs 64.1 [10.7] years; P < .001), in worse NYHA class (T3 vs T1, NYHA class III/IV 35.6% [362 of 1017] vs 26.5% [269 of 1017]; P < .001), and had higher NT-proBNP (median [IQR] T3 vs T1, 2018 [1126-3753] pg/mL vs 1118 [693-1830] pg/mL) and hs-TnT (median [IQR] T3 vs T1, 24.7 [17.1-37.5] ng/L vs 16.6 [11.6-24.9] ng/L) concentrations, and lower eGFR (mean [SD] T3 vs T1, 58.4 [17.6] mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 71.7 [18.0] mL/min/1.73 m2). Patients in tertile 3 of VCAM-1, compared with tertile 1, had the highest risk of each outcome (eg, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for primary outcome 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11-1.77; P = .004). ICAM-1 level was not associated with an elevated risk of any outcome. The benefit of dapagliflozin vs placebo in reducing the risk of the primary outcome was consistent across VCAM-1 tertiles: HR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.54-1.06), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.59-1.12), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.61-0.98) for tertiles 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P for interaction = .93). There was no significant change in VCAM-1 level with dapagliflozin at 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this substudy of the DAPA-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that higher VCAM-1 levels, possibly reflecting a distinct inflammatory/immune pathophysiological pathway in HFrEF, were associated with worse outcomes, even after adjustment for conventional prognostic variables. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03036124.

Aged↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone According to Frailty in Heart Failure: A Prespecified Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with frailty are often perceived to have a less favorable benefit-risk profile for novel therapies and therefore may be less likely to receive these. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of finerenone, compared with placebo, according to frailty status in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF), conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Patients with HF with New York Heart Association functional class II through IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or higher, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels were randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. Data analysis was conducted from October 1 to November 30, 2024. INTERVENTION: Addition of once-daily finerenone or placebo to usual therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events. Frailty was measured using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach. RESULTS: Of the 6001 patients randomized in FINEARTS-HF, a frailty index (FI) was calculable in 5952 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 3241 [54.4%] male). In total, 1588 patients (26.7%) had class I frailty (FI ≤0.210 [not frail]), 2141 (36.0%) had class II frailty (FI 0.211-0.310 [more frail]), and 2223 (37.3%) had class III frailty (FI ≥0.311 [most frail]). Compared with patients with class I frailty, those with class II and III frailty had a higher risk of the primary outcome (unadjusted rate ratio [RR], 1.88 [95% CI, 1.54-2.28] for class II and 3.86 [95% CI, 3.22-4.64] for class III). The effect of finerenone on the primary outcome did not vary significantly by frailty class (class I: RR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.77-1.49]; class II: RR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.83]; class III: RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76-1.07]; P for interaction = .77). Frailty class did not modify the effects of finerenone on the components of the primary outcome, all-cause death, or improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. The effects of finerenone, compared with placebo, on experiencing hypotension, elevated creatinine level, hyperkalemia, or hypokalemia did not differ by frailty class. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In FINEARTS-HF, finerenone reduced the risk of total worsening HF events and cardiovascular death, and it improved symptoms; these effects were not modified by frailty status. In addition, the effects of finerenone on experiencing hypotension, elevated creatinine level, hyperkalemia, or hypokalemia did not differ by frailty status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone and Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely intertwined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction according to the absence or presence of AF and the type of AF (paroxysmal vs persistent or permanent). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified analyses were conducted in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) randomized clinical trial. The trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults aged 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to October 1, 2024. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the composite of total HF events and cardiovascular death. New-onset AF or atrial flutter (AFL) was a prespecified exploratory outcome. RESULTS: Among 5984 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 2724 [45.5%] female) with known AF status at baseline, 1384 (23.1%) had paroxysmal AF and 1886 (31.5%) had persistent or permanent AF. Patients with both types of AF were older and had worse HF status compared with those without AF (2714 patients [45.4%]). Both types of AF were associated with a higher unadjusted risk of the primary outcome compared with no AF (event rate per 100 person-years of follow-up, 20.3 [95% CI, 17.9-23.1] with paroxysmal AF, 19.8 [95% CI, 17.8-22.0] with persistent or permanent AF, and 11.9 [95% CI, 10.7-13.3] with no AF; rate ratio [RR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.37-1.92] with paroxysmal AF and 1.66 [95% CI, 1.43-1.93] with persistent or permanent AF vs no AF); however, the associations were attenuated after adjustment for known prognostic variables. The benefit of finerenone on the primary outcome (overall RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]) was not modified by baseline AF status (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65-0.98] with no AF, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.65-1.06] with paroxysmal AF, and 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.05] with persistent or permanent AF; P for interaction = .94). New-onset AF or AFL occurred in 6.5% of patients and was associated with a higher subsequent adjusted risk of the primary outcome (rate ratio, 3.65 [95% CI, 2.57-5.18]; P < .001). The subdistribution hazard ratio for new-onset AF or AFL among those receiving finerenone vs placebo was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-1.04; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The efficacy of finerenone was consistent regardless of AF status. New-onset AF was associated with a substantially higher risk of subsequent outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The mode of death in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood and may vary by EF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mode of death according to EF and the treatment effect of finerenone on cause-specific mortality in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) randomized clinical trial, which evaluated clinical outcomes in 6001 patients with HF and EF greater than or equal to 40% randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo. The mode of death in relation to baseline EF categories (<50%, ≥50-<60%, and ≥60%) was examined, and the effect of randomized treatment on cause-specific death in Cox regression models was assessed. Data analysis was conducted between September 2024 and January 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone vs placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mode of death as centrally adjudicated by a clinical end points committee. RESULTS: Of 1013 patients (16.9%; median [IQR] age, 76 [69-82] years; 594 male [58.6%]) who died during median (IQR) follow-up of 32 (23-36) months, mode of death was ascribed to cardiovascular causes in 502 (49.6%), noncardiovascular causes in 368 (36.3%), and undetermined cause in 143 (14.1%). Of cardiovascular deaths, 215 (42.8%) were due to sudden death, 163 (32.4%) to HF, 48 (9.6%) to stroke, 25 (5.0%) to myocardial infarction, and 51 (10.2%) to other cardiovascular causes. The proportion of all-cause, cardiovascular, and sudden death was higher in those with EF less than 50%. The proportion of deaths related to HF was similar across EF categories, and the proportion of deaths due to myocardial infarction, stroke, and other cardiovascular causes was low regardless of EF. Randomization to finerenone did not significantly reduce death or cause-specific death compared with placebo in any EF category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF in the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, higher proportions of cardiovascular and overall mortality in those with EF less than 50% were related principally to higher proportions of sudden death. A clear treatment effect of finerenone on cardiovascular or cause-specific mortality was not identified, although the trial was likely underpowered for these outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% who experience LVEF improvement to 40% or higher (HFimpEF) may still face residual risks. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical profiles, risk, and treatment response to finerenone in participants with HFimpEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6001 patients with HE, LVEF of 40% or higher, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, were enrolled between September 14, 2020, and January 10, 2023. Patients with a prior history of LVEF less than 40% were included. Data analysis was conducted between September 1 to December 10, 2024. INTERVENTION: Participants received finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events. RESULTS: Of the 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.7], years; 3269 male [55%]), 273 (5%) had a prior LVEF less than 40%. Among those with a prior LVEF of less than 40%, the median recorded prior LVEF was 35% [IQR, 30%-37%], with a median improvement of 12% [IQR, 8%-17%]. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, those with a history of LVEF of less than 40% experienced higher rates of the primary outcome of a composite of CV death and worsening of HF events (21.4 per 100 patient-years vs 16.0 per 100 patient-years) than did those whose LVEF was consistently 40% or higher. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates; however, this rate ratio (RR) was not statistically different (absolute RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.49, P = .39). The treatment effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent among those with a history of LVEF less than 40% and those with LVEF that was consistently 40% or higher (P for interaction = .36). Owing to higher baseline risk, the absolute risk reduction was greater among those with HFimpEF (9.2 vs 2.5 per 100 patient-years). Patients with HFimpEF tended to develop more hypotension with finerenone treatment, but otherwise, the safety profile of finerenone was similar in patients with and without previous LVEF less than 40%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients with HFimpEF remained at high risk of CV events, underscoring the need for continued management despite LVEF improvement. The treatment benefits of finerenone observed among the overall population of patients with HF with preserved EF were consistent among patients with HFimpEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone for Heart Failure and Risk Estimated by the PREDICT-HFpEF Model: A Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a spectrum of risk, and the effect of therapies may vary by risk. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in HFpEF (PREDICT-HFpEF) in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to evaluate the effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, across the spectrum of risk in these patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The FINEARTS-HF trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 3 PREDICT-HFpEF risk scores for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death, respectively, were calculated. Predicted risk was compared with observed outcomes. Model performance was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. The rates of the predicted outcomes (plus the composite of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, which was the primary end point in the trial) were examined according to quintiles of risk score, as was the effect of finerenone according to risk quintiles. RESULTS: A total of 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.6] years; 3269 male [54.5%]) were randomized in the FINEARTS-HF trial. The C statistics for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death at 2 years were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71), respectively. The risk of the composite outcomes was approximately 8- to 10-fold higher in those in the highest compared with the lowest risk quintile. The relative risk reduction with finerenone compared with placebo was consistent across the spectrum of risk for all outcomes examined (eg, interaction P value for primary outcome = .24). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that the PREDICT-HFpEF models performed well in terms of calibration and discrimination. Baseline risk did not modify the benefit of finerenone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Aged↗

PubMed2025

Estimated Long-Term Benefits of Finerenone in Heart Failure: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: People living with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction have substantially curtailed life expectancy free from clinical events compared with their peers of comparable age. The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, was recently shown to reduce risks of cardiovascular events in this population over a median follow-up of 2.6 years; as patients with HF typically continue treatment beyond this time frame, estimating the potential long-term benefits of finerenone could inform shared clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the projected long-term treatment effects of finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction if treated over a patient's lifetime. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified analyses were conducted of the FINEARTS-HF trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater were randomized from September 2020 to January 2023. Median (IQR) follow-up was 2.6 (1.9-3.0) years. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone (titrated to either 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary composite outcome was time to cardiovascular death or worsening HF event. The long-term gains in survival free from a primary end point with finerenone were iteratively estimated with age-based Kaplan-Meier curves using age at randomization rather than time from randomization. Differences in areas under the survival curves between the finerenone and placebo arms represented event-free survival gains. RESULTS: Among 6001 participants (median [IQR] age, 73 [66-79] years; 3269 male [54.5%]), mean survival free from the primary end point for a 55-year-old participant was 13.6 years (95% CI, 11.9-15.2 years) with finerenone and 10.5 years (95% CI, 6.8-11.3 years) with placebo, representing a gain in event-free survival of 3.1 years (95% CI, 0.8-5.4 years; P = .007). Mean event-free survival for a 65-year-old participant was 11.0 years (95% CI, 10.1-11.9 years) with finerenone and 8.9 years (95% CI, 8.1-9.8 years) with placebo, representing a gain of 2.0 years (95% CI, 0.8-3.3 years; P = .001). Projected mean event-free survival was numerically greater with finerenone than with placebo for every starting age between 50 to 80 years. Lifetime gains in event-free survival were observed even among individuals already treated with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (65-year-old participant: 3.1 years; 95% CI, 0.1-6.0 years; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prespecified secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, long-term treatment with finerenone was estimated to extend event-free survival by up to 3 years among people with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2024

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on All-Cause Hospitalizations in Heart Failure: Post Hoc Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF Randomized Clinical Trials.

IMPORTANCE: Sacubitril/valsartan is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with chronic HF. However, many of these patients are older and have multiple comorbidities that increase the risk of hospitalization for causes other than HF. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on hospitalizations of any cause across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc, participant-level, pooled analysis of the PARADIGM-HF (in patients with an LVEF ≤40%) and PARAGON-HF (in patients with an LVEF ≥45%) randomized clinical trials was conducted from February 5, 2024, to April 5, 2024. Participants with chronic HF, New York Heart Association classes II through IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptides were randomized to treatment with either sacubitril/valsartan or a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi)-enalapril in the PARADIGM-HF trial or valsartan in the PARAGON-HF trial. INTERVENTION: Sacubitril/valsartan vs RASi (enalapril or valsartan). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The effects of sacubitril/valsartan on time to first investigator-reported all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations were examined using Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by geographic region and trial. Effect modification by LVEF as a continuous function was examined. RESULTS: Among 13 194 participants in the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials, mean (SD) patient age was 67 (11) years, 8883 patients (67.3%) were male, and mean (SD) LVEF was 40% (15%). Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the risk of all-cause hospitalization (ACH) compared with RASi over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 2.5 (1.8-3.1) years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97; P = .002). The incidence rate of first ACH was 25 (95% CI, 24-26) per 100 patient-years in the sacubitril/valsartan arm and 27 (95% CI, 26-28) per 100 patient-years in the RASi arm. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 2.1 per 100 patient-years, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 48 patient-years of treatment exposure to prevent 1 ACH. Reductions in overall hospitalizations seemed primarily driven by lower rates of cardiac and pulmonary hospitalizations with sacubitril/valsartan. Patients in the 2 treatment arms had similar rates of composite noncardiac hospitalizations. Treatment heterogeneity on ACH by LVEF was observed (P for interaction = .03), with benefits most apparent in patients with an LVEF less than 60% (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96), but not in patients with an LVEF of 60% or more (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.09). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this post hoc pooled analysis of 13 194 patients with chronic HF in the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF randomized clinical trials, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced hospitalization for any reason, with benefits most apparent in patients with an LVEF below normal. This reduction appeared to be principally driven by lower rates of cardiac and pulmonary hospitalizations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01035255 (PARADIGM-HF) and NCT01920711 (PARAGON-HF).

Humans↗