PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John Kellow

Publications and source records attributed to John Kellow.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Attenuation of the colorectal tonic reflex in female patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Alterations in normal intestinointestinal reflexes may be important contributors to the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aims were to compare the rectal tonic responses to colonic distension in female IBS patients with predominant constipation (IBS-C) and with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) to those in healthy females, both fasting and postprandially. Using a dual barostat assembly, 2-min colonic phasic distensions were performed during fasting and postprandially. Rectal tone was recorded before, during, and after the phasic distension. Colonic compliance and colonic sensitivity in response to the distension were also evaluated fasting and postprandially. Eight IBS-C patients, 8 IBS-D patients, and 8 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects (group N) participated. The fasting increments in rectal tone in response to colonic distension in both IBS-C (rectal balloon volume change -4.6 +/- 6.1 ml) and IBS-D (-7.9 +/- 4.9 ml) were significantly reduced compared with group N (-34 +/- 9.7 ml, P = 0.01). Similar findings were observed postprandially (P = 0.02). When adjusted for the colonic compliance of individual subjects, the degree of attenuation in the rectal tonic response in IBS compared with group N was maintained (fasting P = 0.007; postprandial P = 0.03). When adjusted for colonic sensitivity there was a trend for the attenuation in the rectal tonic response in IBS patients compared with group N to be maintained (fasting P = 0.07, postprandial P = 0.08). IBS patients display a definite attenuation of the normal increase in rectal tone in response to colonic distension (colorectal reflex), fasting and postprandially. Alterations in colonic compliance and sensitivity in IBS are not likely to contribute to such attenuation.

Adolescent↗

Gastrointestinal symptoms in spinal cord injury: relationships with level of injury and psychologic factors.

INTRODUCTION: Previous surveys of gastrointestinal symptoms after spinal cord injury have not used validated questionnaires and have not focused on the full spectrum of such symptoms and their relationship to factors, such as level of spinal cord injury and psychologic dysfunction. This study was designed to detail the spectrum and prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in spinal cord injury and to determine clinical and psychologic factors associated with such symptoms. METHODS: Established spinal cord injury patients (>12 months) randomly selected from a spinal cord injury database completed the following three questionnaires: 1) Rome II Integrative Questionnaire, 2) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and 3) Burwood Bowel Dysfunction after spinal cord injury. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients participated. The prevalence of abdominal bloating and constipation were 22 and 46 percent, respectively. Bloating was associated with cervical (odds ratio = 9.5) and lumbar (odds ratio = 12.1) level but not with thoracic level of injury. Constipation was associated with a higher level of injury (cervical odds ratio = 5.6 vs. lumbar) but not with psychologic factors. In contrast, abdominal pain (33 percent) and fecal incontinence (41 percent) were associated with higher levels of anxiety (odds ratio = 6.8, and odds ratio = 2.4) but not with the level of injury. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence and wide spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms in spinal cord injury. Abdominal bloating and constipation are primarily related to specific spinal cord levels of injury, whereas abdominal pain and fecal incontinence are primarily associated with higher levels of anxiety. Based on our findings, further physiologic and psychologic research studies in spinal cord injury patients should lead to more rational management strategies for the common gastrointestinal symptoms in spinal cord injury.

Abdominal Pain↗

Psychological features are important predictors of functional gastrointestinal disorders in patients with eating disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Gastrointestinal symptoms that occur without evidence of structural gastrointestinal disease are a well-recognized feature of patients with eating disorders (EDs). Despite this, the spectrum and predictors of specific functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), documented using standardized and validated questionnaires, have received little attention. The aims of the study were to describe the prevalence and type of FGIDs in patients suffering from anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN) and eating disorders not otherwise specified (EDNOS), and to determine the relationships between psychological features, eating-disordered attitudes and behaviours, demographic characteristics and the type and number of FGIDs present. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive female patients admitted to an eating disorder unit (AN 44%, BN 22%, EDNOS 34%, mean age 21 years) completed the Rome II modular questionnaire and a range of other validated self-reported questionnaires detailing illness history, psychological features and eating and exercise behaviour. RESULTS: The criteria for at least one FGID were fulfilled by 98% of the sample. The most prevalent FGIDs were irritable bowel syndrome (IBS: 52%), functional heartburn (FH: 51%), functional abdominal bloating (31%), functional constipation (FC: 24%), functional dysphagia (23%) and functional anorectal pain disorder (FAno: 22%); 52% of the sample satisfied the criteria for at least three coexistent FGIDs. Psychological variables (somatization, neuroticism, state and trait anxiety), age and binge eating were significant predictors of specific, and > or =3 coexistent FGIDs. Other disordered eating characteristics, including body mass index, were not predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with EDs, specific psychological traits predict FGID type and the presence of multiple coexistent FGIDs. These findings support the role of specific psychological features as important contributors to certain FGIDs.

Adult↗

Modulatory influences on antegrade and retrograde tonic reflexes in the colon and rectum.

Tonic reflexes in the colon and rectum are likely to be important in health and in disorders of gastrointestinal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fasting and postprandial "colorectal" and "rectocolic" reflexes in response to 2-min isobaric distensions of the colon and rectum, accounting for enteric sensation, compliance, and distending balloon volume. In 14 healthy fasting subjects, a dual barostat assembly was positioned (descending colon and rectum). A 2-min phasic distension was performed in the colon and rectum in random order while the opposing balloon volume was recorded. Sensation (phasic distension) and compliance (ramp distension) were also determined. The experiment was repeated postprandially. Colonic distension resulted in significant rectal tonic contraction in the fasting (rectal volume change: -35.4 +/- 8.4 ml, P < 0.01) and postprandial (-22.2 +/- 8.4 ml, P < 0.01) states. After adjustment for colonic sensitivity, for compliance, and for distending balloon volume, the rectal volume change remained significant; the extent of the tonic response, however, correlated significantly with increasing pain score (P < 0.01). In contrast, rectal distension did not produce a significant tonic response in the colon (fasting: -6.5 +/- 7.3 ml; postprandial: 2.7 +/- 7.3 ml), either unadjusted or adjusted for rectal sensitivity, compliance, and distending balloon volume. In conclusion, the colorectal reflex, but not the rectocolic reflex, can be readily demonstrated both before and after a meal in response to a 2-min isobaric distension in the colon and rectum, respectively. Although the presence of the colorectal reflex does not depend on colonic sensitivity or the volume of the distending colonic balloon, these factors modulate the reflex, especially in the fasting state.

Adult↗

Small bowel motility.

The publications relevant to small bowel motility have been concentrated during the past year in several main areas: further characterization of normal patterns of small bowel motor activity and transit, physiologic control mechanisms, visceral hypersensitivity, inflammation and motility, disease processes and dysmotility, and novel pharmacologic approaches to altered sensorimotor activity.

Journal Article↗