Biomedical subjects

John L VanCott

Publications and source records attributed to John L VanCott.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Mice develop effective but delayed protective immune responses when immunized as neonates either intranasally with nonliving VP6/LT(R192G) or orally with live rhesus rotavirus vaccine candidates.

Rotavirus vaccines are delivered early in life, when the immune system is immature. To determine the effects of immaturity on responses to candidate vaccines, neonatal (7 days old) and adult mice were immunized with single doses of either Escherichia coli-expressed rotavirus VP6 protein and the adjuvant LT(R192G) or live rhesus rotavirus (RRV), and protection against fecal rotavirus shedding following challenge with the murine rotavirus strain EDIM was determined. Neonatal mice immunized intranasally with VP6/LT(R192G) were unprotected at 10 days postimmunization (dpi) and had no detectable rotavirus B-cell (antibody) or CD4(+) CD8(+) T-cell (rotavirus-inducible, Th1 [gamma interferon and interleukin-2 {IL-2}]-, Th2 [IL-5 and IL-4]-, or ThIL-17 [IL-17]-producing spleen cells) responses. However, by 28 and 42 dpi, these mice were significantly (P >or= 0.003) protected and contained memory rotavirus-specific T cells but produced no rotavirus antibody. In contrast, adult mice were nearly fully protected by 10 dpi and contained both rotavirus immunoglobulin G and memory T cells. Neonates immunized orally with RRV were also less protected (P=0.01) than adult mice by 10 dpi and produced correspondingly less rotavirus antibody. Both groups contained few rotavirus-specific memory T cells. Protection levels by 28 dpi for neonates or adults were equal, as were rotavirus antibody levels. This report introduces a neonatal mouse model for active protection studies with rotavirus vaccines. It indicates that, with time, neonatal mice develop full protection after intranasal immunization with VP6/LT(R192G) or oral immunization with a live heterologous rotavirus and supports reports that protection depends on CD4(+) T cells or antibody, respectively.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2003

Functional mapping of protective epitopes within the rotavirus VP6 protein in mice belonging to different haplotypes.

We recently used "functional mapping" to locate protective epitopes in the carboxyl terminus (aa 197-397) of the VP6 protein (designated CD) of the EDIM strain of murine rotavirus [J. Virol. 74 (2000) 11574]. For this, H-2(d) BALB/c mice were given two intranasal (i.n.) immunizations (separated by 2 weeks) with VP6 or CD genetically-fused to maltose-binding protein, or with overlapping synthetic CD peptides, along with LT(R192G), a genetically-attenuated E. coli heat-labile toxin. The protective efficacies, i.e., percentage reductions in rotavirus shedding relative to control mice during 7 days following oral challenge with EDIM, were determined 4 weeks after the second immunization. Five of the 11 overlapping CD peptides stimulated significant protection (57-85%, P<0.05). Furthermore, chimeric VP6, the CD fragment, and a 14-amino-acid VP6 peptide within CD (RLSFQLMRPPNMTP), identified as a H-2(d)-restricted CD4 T cell epitope, were highly protective (93-98%, P<0.05). In this study, we continued to utilize functional mapping to show that the 14-mer peptide elicited significant protection (97.0%, P<0.05) in another H-2(d) mouse strain (DBA/2) but partial protection in H-2(b) 129 (39.2%) and C57Bl/6 (53.6%) as well as H-2(k) C3H (44.6%) mice. The first 13 amino acids of this 14-mer were necessary to induce maximal protection in H-2(d) mice. In addition, the H-2(b) 129 mice were immunized intranasally (i.n.) with 10 of the synthetic CD peptides and 5 were found to induce significant protection (90-97%, P<0.05). We also performed functional mapping to identify MHC class I epitopes in rotavirus proteins. A class I-binding epitope for H-2(b) C57Bl/6 mice had previously been mapped by ex vivo CTL assays within the VP6 protein and two additional class I epitopes were identified by computer-based prediction. When examined for their protective efficacies by functional mapping, two of the three were found to be partially but not significantly protective (44 and 46%, P>0.05). To better determine the usefulness of our in vivo methods to identify MHC class I-binding epitopes, four epitopes from the outer capsid VP7 rotavirus protein determined in ex vivo assays were evaluated for their protective efficacies and two were found to be partially protective. Together, these studies show that functional mapping is useful in locating epitopes that are relevant to the development of subunit rotavirus vaccines.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Intranasal or oral immunization of inbred and outbred mice with murine or human rotavirus VP6 proteins protects against viral shedding after challenge with murine rotaviruses.

Intranasal (i.n.) administration of an Escherichia coli-expressed chimeric VP6 protein from the EDIM strain of murine rotavirus to adult BALB/c (H-2(d)) mice along with LT(R192G), an attenuated mutant of the mucosal adjuvant E. coli heat-labile toxin, has been found to consistently stimulate ca. 99% reductions in rotavirus shedding after subsequent EDIM challenge. This study was designed to determine the robustness of this protection, i.e. can VP6 immunization consistently protect against shedding in this model, thus, providing an indication of its potential as a vaccine. Intranasal immunization with two 8.8 microg doses of EDIM VP6 and 10 microg of LT(R192G) was found to stimulate 99% reductions in EDIM shedding in four additional strains of inbred mice belonging to three haplotypes, i.e. DBA/2 (H-2(d)), C57BL/6 (H-2(b)), 129 (H-2(b)) and C3H (H-2(k)). Protection stimulated against EDIM antigen shedding following i.n. immunization with VP6 from the human CJN strain was less (P=0.02) than induced by EDIM VP6 (86% versus 99%), but no further loss of protection was observed when the dose of CJN VP6 was reduced 100-fold. Protection against EDIM shedding was also maintained after i.n. immunization of three strains of outbred mice (CF-1, CD-1 and Swiss Webster) with either EDIM or CJN VP6, i.e. EDIM VP6 immunization reduced EDIM shedding by 99% while CJN VP6 immunization produced reductions of 86-96%. Protection stimulated by oral immunization of BALB/c mice with two 8.8 microg doses of either VP6 chimera plus LT(R192G) was not significantly different from that induced by i.n. immunization. Finally, protection found after either oral or i.n. immunization with EDIM or CJN VP6 was no different when the mice were challenged with McN, another strain of murine rotavirus. These results support further evaluation of VP6 as a vaccine.

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed2002

The level of protection against rotavirus shedding in mice following immunization with a chimeric VP6 protein is dependent on the route and the coadministered adjuvant.

Intranasal (i.n.) immunization of BALB/c mice with chimeric murine rotavirus EDIM (epizootic diarrhea of infant mice) VP6 and attenuated E. coli heat-labile toxin (LT), LT(R192G), stimulated >99% protection against rotavirus shedding after EDIM challenge. Here, we evaluated other potential adjuvants with chimeric VP6 administered by two mucosal routes: i.n. and oral. Besides LT(R192G), the adjuvants examined included Adjumer, CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN), chimeric A1 subunit of cholera toxin (CTA1)-DD, and QS-21. All except QS-21 significantly (P<0.05) increased VP6-specific serum IgG responses after i.n. immunization, but none significantly increased these responses when administered orally. The i.n. delivery of chimeric VP6 alone induced both rotavirus IgG1 and IgG2a whose relative titers suggested a skewed Th2-like response. Inclusion of Adjumer greatly increased Th2-like responses, while CpG ODN shifted the response to a less Th2-like response. The adjuvants CTA1-DD, LT(R192G), QS-21 had no significant effect on ratios of IgG1/IgG2a titers. Following EDIM challenge of mice immunized i.n. with chimeric VP6 and either LT(R192G), CTA1-DD, Adjumer or CpG ODN, shedding was reduced >99, 95, 80, 74, respectively, relative to that found in unimmunized mice (P<0.05). QS-21 induced less protection (43%, not significant (N.S.)) while immunization with chimeric VP6 alone reduced shedding by only 16% (N.S.). Oral immunization with chimeric VP6 and all selected adjuvants except QS-21 was less effective than after i.n. immunization, with protection levels of 94 (P<0.05), 71 (P<0.05), 55, 35 and 28% for LT(R192G), QS-21, CpG ODN, CTA1-DD, and Adjumer, respectively, while immunization with chimeric VP6 alone gave no protection. Thus, different adjuvants induced different degrees of protection and oral immunization was generally less effective then the i.n. route.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2002

CD4 T cells are the only lymphocytes needed to protect mice against rotavirus shedding after intranasal immunization with a chimeric VP6 protein and the adjuvant LT(R192G).

Intranasal immunization of mice with a chimeric VP6 protein and the mucosal adjuvant Escherichia coli heat labile toxin LT(R192G) induces nearly complete protection against murine rotavirus (strain EDIM [epizootic diarrhea of infant mice virus]) shedding for at least 1 year. The aim of this study was to identify the protective lymphocytes elicited by this new vaccine candidate. Immunization of mouse strains lacking one or more lymphocyte populations revealed that protection was dependent on alphabeta T cells but mice lacking gammadelta T cells and B cells remained fully protected. Furthermore, depletion of CD8 T cells in immunized B-cell-deficient mice before challenge resulted in no loss of protection, while depletion of CD4 T cells caused complete loss of protection. Therefore, alphabeta CD4 T cells appeared to be the only lymphocytes required for protection. As confirmation, purified splenic T cells from immunized mice were intraperitoneally injected into Rag-2 mice chronically infected with EDIM. Transfer of 2 x 10(6) CD8 T cells had no effect on shedding, while transfer of 2 x 10(5) CD4 T cells fully resolved shedding in 7 days. Interestingly, transfer of naive splenic CD4 T cells also resolved shedding but more time and cells were required. Together, these results establish CD4 T cells as effectors of protection against rotavirus after intranasal immunization of mice with VP6 and LT(R192G).

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗