PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John M Findlay

Publications and source records attributed to John M Findlay.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Object structure and saccade planning.

When orienting to a newly appearing display, evidence shows that two saccadic eye movements are often prepared together. By looking the relation between the landing positions of the first and the second saccade, we examine the frame of reference used for the preparation of the second saccade aiming for a new object or exploring within the same object. We demonstrate that the action to be performed on the object affects the coding of the second saccade. A second saccade directed to a new object is coded to aim for a target position on it and is adjusted to the landing position of the first saccade, whereas a second saccade within the same object is coded as a fixed motor vector applied irrespective of the initial landing position on the object.

Attention↗

Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?

Readers' eye movements were monitored when they read either normal sentences or sentences with masked or disappearing text (in which the fixated word disappeared or was masked after 60 ms). The goals of the research were to investigate (1) whether a gap effect occurred in reading and (2) the influence of linguistic and visual factors on oculomotor control. The results of a number of global analyses of eye movements under disappearing text conditions clearly demonstrated that there is no gap effect in reading. However, comparative analyses across a number of local measures in the experiments indicated that cognitive/lexical processes, as well as the continual uptake of visual information, influence eye movement control during reading. A persistent visual object throughout fixation caused refixations and even when a fixated word had disappeared (or been masked), there were significant effects of word frequency and word length.

Cognition↗

Is object search mediated by object-based or image-based representations?

Recent research suggests that visually specific memory representations for previously fixated objects are maintained during scene perception. Here we investigate the degree of visual specificity by asking whether the memory representations are image-based or object-based. To that end we measured the effects of object orientation on the time to search for a familiar object from amongst a set of 7 familiar distractors arranged in a circular array. Search times were found to depend on the relative orientations of the target object and the probe object for both familiar and novel objects. This effect was found to be partly an image matching effect but there was also an advantage shown for the object's canonical view for familiar objects. Orientation effects were maintained even when the target object was specified as having unique or similar shape properties relative to the distractors. Participants' eye movements were monitored during two of the experiments. Eye movement patterns revealed selection for object shape and object orientation during the search process. Our findings provide evidence for object representations during search that are detailed and share image-based characteristics with more high-level characteristics from object memory.

Adult↗

Saccade target selection in visual search: accuracy improves when more distractors are present.

We report four experiments with search displays of Gabor patches. Our aim was to study the accuracy of gaze control in search tasks. In Experiment 1, a target was presented with a single distractor Gabor of a different spatial frequency on the same axis. Subjects could locate the target with the first saccade if the distractor was more distant, but when the distractor was between the fixation point and the target, the first saccade landed much closer to the distractor. In Experiment 2, the number of display items was increased to 16 in a double ring configuration. With this configuration, first saccades were accurately directed to the target, even when there was an intervening distractor in exactly the same configuration as in Experiment 1. Experiment 3 suggested that the improvement in accuracy was not due to distractor homogeneity but rather may be attributable to the increased first saccade latency with the ring configuration. In the final experiment, latency was shown to covary with saccade accuracy. The results are related to a general framework whereby the presence of distractors operates to hold fixation for a longer period of time, thus allowing a greater period of visual processing and more accurate eye movements.

Adult↗

Foveal stimulation and saccadic latencies.

We investigated how a postsaccadic visual error affects the latency of the subsequent saccade. Observers made sequences of saccades directed to a single object or three separate objects, which could be displaced backward or onward during the primary saccade. The results showed an increase of second saccade latency after a backward displacement and a decrease of second saccade latency after an onward displacement. Moreover, second saccade latencies were particularly short after an onward displacement which resulted in a primary saccade landing position outside the boundary of the objects. We interpret the latency differences in terms of known effects within the saccadic system, specifically the sensitivity to the pattern of visual stimulation, particularly at and near the fovea, and the inverse correlation between secondary saccade amplitudes and secondary saccade latencies.

Fovea Centralis↗

Visual sensitivity in search tasks depends on the response requirement.

This paper reports a comparison between two tasks of visual search. Two observers carried out, in separate blocks, a saccade-to-target task and a manual-target-detection task. The displays, which were identical for the two tasks, consisted of a ring of eight equally spaced Gabor patches. The target could be defined by a difference from the distractors along four possible dimensions: orientation, spatial frequency, contrast or size. These four dimensions were used as variables in separate experiments. In each experiment, performance was measured over an extensive range of values of the particular dimension. Thresholds were thus obtained for the saccade and the manual response tasks. The nature of the response was found to modify the relative visual sensitivity. For orientation differences, manual response performance was better than saccade-to-target performance. The reverse was true for spatial frequency and contrast differences, where saccade-to-target performance was better than manual response performance. We conclude that saccade-selection in a search task draws on different visual information from that used for manual responding in the equivalent task. The two tasks thus differ in more than the different response systems used: the results suggest the action of different underlying neural visual mechanisms as well as different neural motor mechanisms.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Are spatial frequencies integrated from coarse to fine?

The existence of a temporal anisotropy in the integration of spatial frequencies, such that spatial frequencies are integrated more effectively if they are available from low to high through time, has been examined in a series of experiments. In the first experiment, the first three harmonics of a square wave were presented in a low-to-high or a high-to-low sequence in a temporal two-interval forced-choice experiment. Subjects were asked to indicate which sequence appeared to resemble a square wave more. A high-to-low sequence of spatial frequencies was judged to more resemble the target than the low-to-high sequence. These results support a temporal anisotropy in the integration of spatial frequencies of exactly the opposite form to that suggested from previous results. Further experiments established that this was not due to task differences or to subjects basing their decision on the final spatial frequency shown. An interpretation is offered in which an isotropic mechanism for spatial-frequency integration is combined with a recency bias.

Adult↗