PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John MacFie

Publications and source records attributed to John MacFie.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Commensal bacteria do translocate across the intestinal barrier in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: The "gut origin of sepsis" hypothesis proposes that enteric bacteria may cause sepsis at distant extra-intestinal sites. Whilst there is much circumstantial evidence to support this hypothesis, there is no conclusive proof in humans. The nature of translocating bacteria remains unclear. The aim of this study was to establish the origin of Escherichia coli (E. coli) cultured from mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and determine if they belonged to any recognized pathotypes known to cause infections in humans. METHODS: MLN and faecal samples were obtained from 98 patients undergoing colonic resection. E. coli were isolated from 9/98 MLN samples. DNA fingerprints of MLN isolates were compared with faecal isolates from the same patient. MLN isolates were tested for adherence and invasion using HEp-2 epithelial cells, and screened for DNA markers indicative of different pathotypes of E. coli. MLN isolates were also tested for internalisation into Caco-2 cells. RESULTS: All the nine E. coli cultured from MLNs were found to have identical DNA fingerprints to at least one and often several E. coli isolates cultured from faecal samples of the same patient. 8/9 (89%) MLN isolates were weakly adherent and 2/9 (22.2%) were invasive. 8/9 (89%) tested negative for DNA markers. All the nine MLN strains were internalised by Caco-2 cells. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the gut origin of translocating bacteria. Most translocating E. coli do not belong to any recognised pathotype and are therefore normal commensal microflora. Our results suggest that bacterial translocation is more dependent upon the gut epithelium rather than the virulence properties of resident enteric bacteria.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A prospective randomised trial of probiotics in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Probiotics exert a beneficial effect on the host through modulation of gastrointestinal microflora. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on gut barrier function and the systemic inflammatory response in critically ill patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and three critically ill patients were randomised to receive an oral preparation containing L. plantarum 299v (ProViva) in addition to conventional therapy (treatment group, n = 52) or conventional therapy alone (control group, n = 51). Serial outcome measures included gastric colonisation, intestinal permeability (lactulose/rhamnose dual-sugar probe technique), endotoxin exposure (IgM EndoCAb), C-reactive protein and Interleukin 6 levels. RESULTS: L. plantarum had no identifiable effect on gastric colonisation, intestinal permeability, endotoxin exposure or serum CRP levels. There were no differences between the groups in terms of septic morbidity or mortality. On day 15 serum IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the treatment group compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: The enteral administration of L. plantarum 299v to critically ill patients was associated with a late attenuation of the systemic inflammatory response. This was not accompanied by any significant changes in the intestinal microflora, intestinal permeability, endotoxin exposure, septic morbidity or mortality.

APACHE↗
PubMed2004

Influence of synbiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb 12, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and oligofructose on gut barrier function and sepsis in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infective complications are a common cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Many factors affect sepsis, one of which is gut barrier function. The aim of this study was to determine whether the oral administration of a synbiotic preparation could alter gut barrier function in critically ill patients and thus reduce sepsis. METHODS: A total of 90 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were randomised to receive either synbiotic or placebo preparations (45 into each group). The synbiotic preparation consisted of Lactobacillus acidophilus La5, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb 12, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (probiotics) with oligofructose (prebiotic). Gut barrier function was assessed by measurement of intestinal permeability (lactulose/rhamnose test) and culture of nasogastric aspirate on days 1 and 8. All septic complications and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, APACHE II or POSSUM scores. After 1 week of therapy, patients in the synbiotic group had a significantly lower incidence of potentially pathogenic bacteria (43% versus 75%, P = 0.05) and multiple organisms (39% versus 75%, P = 0.01) in their nasogastric aspirates than controls. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of intestinal permeability, septic complications or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of synbiotic in critically ill patients favourably altered the microbial composition of the upper gastrointestinal tract but had no effect on intestinal permeability and was not associated with measurable clinical benefit.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Optimal nutritional support.

There is ongoing debate about the respective roles of enteral and parenteral nutrition. The present short review suggests that these two feeding modalities are not mutually exclusive and that optimal nutritional support may necessitate the concomitant administration of enteral together with parenteral nutrition.

Critical Illness↗