Biomedical subjects

John R Jordan

Publications and source records attributed to John R Jordan.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Validation of a behavioral health treatment outcome and assessment tool designed for naturalistic settings: The Treatment Outcome Package.

In 1994, the American Psychological Association and the Society for Psychotherapy Research convened a Core Battery Conference to develop a set of criteria for the selection of a universal core battery that could be used as a common outcome tool across all outcome studies. The Treatment Outcome Package (TOP) is a behavioral health assessment and outcome battery with modules for assessing a wide array of behavioral health symptoms and functioning, demographics, case-mix, and treatment satisfaction. It was developed to follow the design specifications set forth by the Core Battery Conference, but also to ensure the battery's applicability to naturalistic treatment settings in which randomization may be impossible. In this article we discuss a number of studies that evaluate the initial psychometrics of the items that comprise the mental health symptom and functional modules of the TOP. We conclude that the TOP has an excellent factor structure, good test-retest reliability, promising initial convergent and discriminant validity, measures the full range of pathology on each scale, and has some ability to distinguish between behavioral health clients and members of the general population.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The grief evaluation measure (GEM): an initial validation study.

This article describes the development of the Grief Evaluation Measure (GEM), a new instrument designed to screen for the development of a complicated mourning response in a bereaved adult. The GEM provides a quantitative and qualitative assessment of risk factors, including the mourner's loss and medical history, coping resources before and after the death, and circumstances surrounding the death. It is designed to provide an in-depth evaluation of the bereaved adult's subjective grief experience and associated symptoms. Reliability and validity studies were conducted with two samples of bereaved adults (n = 23 and n = 92, respectively) from various clinical and support settings. Data on the two central sections of the GEM that assess the mourner's grief response and the level of symptomatology are described. Results indicate that the GEM's internal consistency and test-retest reliability are high. The GEM demonstrates good concurrent validity for established measures of bereavement, trauma, and physical and psychiatric symptoms, and good predictive validity for mourner adjustment one year after initial assessment. Plans for future development and an invitation for other researchers to collaborate with research on the GEM are also discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2004

Interventions for suicide survivors: a review of the literature.

Mourning after suicide is frequently a difficult experience. Research suggests that suicide survivors may be at elevated risk for several psychiatric and somatic complications. Despite this, very little research has focused on developing and empirically evaluating clinical interventions for this population. This paper attempts to stimulate interest in intervention research by reviewing three relevant areas: (a) studies of the perceived needs of survivors; (b) implications of the research on general bereavement interventions for work with survivors; and (c) research documenting the efficacy of specific interventions for adult survivors. Recommendations for future studies are discussed.

Female↗

PubMed2003

Does grief counseling work?

Most bereavement caregivers accept as a truism that their interventions are helpful. However, an examination of the bereavement intervention literature suggests that the scientific basis for accepting the efficacy of grief counseling may be quite weak. This article summarizes the findings of four recent qualitative and quantitative reviews of the bereavement intervention literature. It then discusses three possible explanations for these surprising findings and concludes with recommendations for both researchers and clinicians in thanatology that could help to focus efforts to answer the questions of when and for whom grief counseling is helpful.

Adaptation, Psychological↗