Metastatic myoepithelial carcinoma of the vulva treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Biomedical subjects
John R Murren
Publications and source records attributed to John R Murren.
Evaluation of irinotecan plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had histologically confirmed chemotherapy naïve stage IV NSCLC or stage IIIB disease that was not suitable for combined modality therapy. Patients were treated with irinotecan 50 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 75 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. If the patient did not experience >grade 1 toxicity during the first cycle, the dose of irinotecan could be escalated to 60 mg/m(2). Patients were evaluated for tumor response rate, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-three eligible patients were treated. Two (9%) patients achieved a partial response. Eight patients (35%) had stable disease. The median number of cycles given per patient was four (range 1-29). The major toxicities were grade >or=3 neutropenia (26%) and grade 3 diarrhea (5%). The median time to progression was 2.8 months (range 0.5-21.8 months) for all patients and 4.3 months for the patients who had either stable disease or a partial response. The median overall survival was 9.2 months (range 0.5-40 months). The one- and two-year survival rates were 39% and 13%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel is safe in advanced NSCLC and affords a survival similar to other non-platinum as well as platinum-based doublets. However, this combination does not have sufficient activity to justify further study in an unselected population. If biomarkers are developed that can guide the selection of chemotherapy in an individual patient, there may be a rationale for further evaluation of this regimen.
Aged↗
A phase II study of topotecan and cyclophosphamide with G-CSF in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of topotecan and cyclophosphamide for patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had newly diagnosed extensive stage SCLC or if they had SCLC that progressed more than three months after completion of the first chemotherapy regimen. Patients were treated every 21 days with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5. Filgrastim was administered for 10 days starting on day 6. Patients were evaluated for objective tumor response, time to tumor progression, overall survival and toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-two eligible patients were treated. Seventeen patients (40.5%) had an objective response including 4 (9.5%) complete remissions (CR). Fifteen patients (35.7%) had stable disease. There are 2 patients known to be alive at the time of this report: one with stable disease at 26 months and another with a CR at 37 months. The median number of cycles completed was 6 (range 1-12). The major toxicities were grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (73.8%), grades 3 and 4 anemia (35.7%) and grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (50%). Five patients died during the first cycle of chemotherapy. The median time to progression was 3 months (range 5 days-36 months) (CI: 51-135 days) and the median overall survival was 9 months (5 days-37 months) (CI: 210-330 days). The two-year survival rate was 21%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of topotecan and cyclophosphamide is highly active in small cell lung cancer. Myelosuppression is the major toxicity and is rapidly reversible in most patients. The incidence of treatment-related mortality was comparable to some other intensive chemotherapy regimens. This incidence is unacceptably high and indicates better selection criteria are needed in order to exclude patients at excessive risk of morbidity.
Aged↗
Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 14% of all cases of lung cancer. Combination chemotherapy is the most effective treatment modality for SCLC and recently, several new active drugs have emerged. Combinations of platinum agents with CPT-11 or gemcitabine have been successfully compared in phase III trials against the cisplatin/etoposide standard. Modest improvements in the outcome of patients with SCLC have been noted over the last two decades. Thoracic irradiation given concurrently with chemotherapy improves survival compared with sequential chemotherapy and radiation, but this approach is associated with more toxicity. Moreover, the optimal doses and fractionation of thoracic irradiation remain to be determined. Three-dimensional treatment planning is under investigation. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has established a role in the management of patients who have achieved a complete response to the initial therapy. Novel molecular targeted therapies are among the strategies currently being investigated in SCLC.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
Lapatinib ditosylate GlaxoSmithKline.
Lapatinib ditosylate, an ErbB-2 and EGFR dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is being developed by GlaxoSmithKline plc for the potential treatment of solid tumors.
Animals↗
Angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer. A new target for therapy.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is cured with surgery in a minority of affected persons. Chemotherapy and radiation can palliate and extend survival of patients with disease not amenable to surgery. Consequently, new treatment options are urgently needed. In the era of molecularly targeted therapeutics, the recent direction in cancer research has been to identify and modulate specific events in tumorigenesis. Angiogenesis, or new vessel formation, is one such event elucidated to be fundamental to the development, growth, and metastasis of cancers and is one of the characteristics that differentiates tumor from host. Thus, targeting of tumor neovasculature continues to generate tremendous enthusiasm and effort in drug development. Extensive research into the role of angiogenesis in NSCLC has produced a host of novel targets; their potential inhibitors, now numbering over 40, are in various phases of clinical testing around the world. The current lead compounds include inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases, angiogenic growth factors and their receptor tyrosine kinases. Despite their impressive activity in animal models, definitive evidence of their antitumor activity in humans is yet to be established. We face several challenges as we look to advance the field of antiangiogenesis for the treatment of cancer, namely, the need for a better understanding of the optimal timing and dosing of antiangiogenic agents, the validation of imaging and quantification methods of tumor angiogenesis, and a new clinical trials design for a more expedient evaluation of novel cytostatic target modulators.
Angiogenesis Inducing Agents↗
Therapy for stage IIIB and stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
The treatment options for unresectable stage III NSCLC include definitive RT, chemotherapy, combined chemoradiotherapy, or supportive care. Compared with radiation alone or chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and standard RT confers a modest survival benefit at the cost of increased toxicity for patients with an excellent performance status. For metastatic disease, combination chemotherapy--in particular, platinum-based regimens--improves symptom control and survival. Newer chemotherapeutic agents with higher response rates and favorable toxicity profiles are improving outcome even for the elderly and debilitated patients and those refractory to first-line chemotherapy. Evolving understanding of the molecular events in tumorigenesis is uncovering a host of promising targets for mechanism-based therapy. Many of these novel target modulators likely will require combination with conventional chemotherapy for optimal results.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Modulating multidrug resistance: can we target this therapy?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
Camptothecin and taxane regimens for small-cell lung cancer.
For more than 2 decades, combination chemotherapy has been the standard treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer. Despite high initial response rates in both extensive- and limited-stage disease, long-term survival rates are only 10% to 20%. Camptothecins and taxanes are newer classes of agents that have shown significant activity against small-cell lung cancer. Their incorporation into chemotherapy regimens for small-cell lung cancer is being actively studied. In one randomized multicenter study, patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer treated with irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) and cisplatin had a better survival time than patients receiving standard therapy. The combination of taxanes and irinotecan holds promise as an active regimen that may be tolerated better than cisplatin and irinotecan.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
Erlotinib OSI/Roche/Genentech.
Erlotinib (CP-358774, OSI-774, Tarceva), a quinazoline derivative, is an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor under development jointly by Genentech, OSI (formerly Oncogene Science) and Roche, both as monotherapy and combination therapy for the potential treatment of solid tumors, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic, breast, head and neck cancers [203487]. Development of the compound is most advanced for NSCLC and pancreatic cancer; in July 2001, phase III combination trials were initiated for NSCLC [416835]. In October 2001, phase III monotherapy trials in NSCLC and phase III combination trials in pancreatic cancer were also initiated [426704]. In Japan, the compound was in phase I studies in January 2002 [439189].
Animals↗
Phase I dose escalation trial of weekly docetaxel plus irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer.
Background. Docetaxel and irinotecan have additive or synergistic activity in vitro and in vivo as well as differing toxicities and unique mechanisms of action. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of docetaxel and irinotecan given on a weekly schedule. Methods. Eligible patients had advanced, incurable, solid tumors. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour infusion and escalated over four dose levels (25, 30, 35, and 40 mg/m(2)) followed by irinotecan administered over 30 minutes at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2). Treatment was administered weekly for four weeks followed by two weeks of rest. To improve tolerability, the schedule was modified to weekly administration for two weeks with one week of rest, and irinotecan was escalated over 3 dose levels (55, 60, and 65 mg/m(2)) with docetaxel fixed at 35 mg/m(2). Results. Forty-four patients were treated and the most common dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea observed in 11% of patients. Severe neutropenia was rare (grade 4: 2%, grade 3: 23%). Other nonhematologic toxicities included nausea/vomiting, dehydration and fatigue. Partial responses occurred in two patients with pancreatic cancer, and one patient each with non-small cell lung and esophageal cancer. Conclusions. Weekly docetaxel and irinotecan is a promising non-cisplatin doublet with preliminary evidence of activity in advanced solid tumors. Diarrhea is the predominant dose-limiting toxicity but unlike the every 3 weeks schedule myelosuppression is modest. The recommended phase II doses are docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule. Phase II trials of this regimen are ongoing or planned in lung, head and neck, stomach, esophageal, and pancreatic cancers.
Adult↗
Phase I study of perillyl alcohol in patients with refractory malignancies.
We treated 21 patients in a dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of the monoterpene perillyl alcohol with the drug given orally in 3 divided doses on a chronic basis. The average number of days that patients remained on study was 48 (range 11-172). Fatigue and low-grade nausea were dose limiting. Using this schedule, a starting dose of 1.6 g/m2 with escalation to 2.1 g/m2 as tolerated is recommended. Two major metabolites were detectable and the mean peak plasma concentrations were 383 microM for perillic acid and 27 microM for dihydroperillic acid. The peak plasma concentration and the metabolite half-life were 2 h and 1 h post ingestion for perillic acid, and 4 h and 2.4 h for dihydroperillic acid, respectively. Stabilization of disease was observed in one of the 16 patients evaluable for response. Many of the gastrointestinal side effects that were poorly tolerated on a chronic basis may be partly related to the soybean oil base used in the current formulation. Further development of perillyl alcohol on this schedule would be facilitated by reformulation of the capsule.
Adult↗