Biomedical subjects

John Stingl

Publications and source records attributed to John Stingl.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Steroid hormone receptor status of mouse mammary stem cells.

The estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha), progesterone receptor (PR), and erbB2 (Her2 in humans) are important prognostic markers of human breast cancer, and they are variably expressed in different subtypes of breast cancer. The basal subtype, for example, is negative for ERalpha, PR, and Her2 by immunohistochemistry. We investigated the expression of these signaling molecules in enriched populations of mouse mammary stem cells and luminal cells that were isolated according to their differential expression of CD24 and the alpha6beta1-integrin complex. We found that the basal population, which is enriched in mouse mammary stem cells, did not express ERalpha, PR, or ErbB2/Her2 but did express epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/ErbB1, whereas the subset of cells enriched for luminal cells expressed ERalpha (37% of cells) and PR (40% of cells) but not ErbB2/Her2 or EGFR/ErbB1. Ovariectomy confirmed the importance of estrogen signaling to luminal cell proliferation but had no effect on the size of the mouse mammary stem cell-enriched population. Thus, mouse mammary stem cells were negative for ERalpha, PR, and ErbB2 and appeared to share common properties with poor-prognosis basal breast cancer.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Deciphering the mammary epithelial cell hierarchy.

Clonal assays offer a powerful approach to dissecting the many events involved in the generation and maintenance of complex tissues from an undifferentiated stem cell pool. The application of such quantitative functional methodologies to studies of the hematopoietic system have been key to defining the hierarchy of progenitor subsets that reflect an irreversible stepwise process of lineage restriction. Recent studies now suggest that a similar paradigm applies to the normal mammary gland. The adult mouse mammary gland maintains a population of stem cells that generate biologically distinct and physically separable subpopulations of mammary epithelial progenitors which, in turn, generate terminally differentiated cells. Suggestive parallels between mouse and human mammary cells point to the likelihood that a similarly structured multi-step differentiation program characterizes the mammary gland from both species.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell.

The existence of mammary stem cells (MaSCs) has been postulated from evidence that the mammary gland can be regenerated by transplantation of epithelial fragments in mice. Interest in MaSCs has been further stimulated by their potential role in breast tumorigenesis. However, the identity and purification of MaSCs has proved elusive owing to the lack of defined markers. We isolated discrete populations of mouse mammary cells on the basis of cell-surface markers and identified a subpopulation (Lin-CD29hiCD24+) that is highly enriched for MaSCs by transplantation. Here we show that a single cell, marked with a LacZ transgene, can reconstitute a complete mammary gland in vivo. The transplanted cell contributed to both the luminal and myoepithelial lineages and generated functional lobuloalveolar units during pregnancy. The self-renewing capacity of these cells was demonstrated by serial transplantation of clonal outgrowths. In support of a potential role for MaSCs in breast cancer, the stem-cell-enriched subpopulation was expanded in premalignant mammary tissue from MMTV-wnt-1 mice and contained a higher number of MaSCs. Our data establish that single cells within the Lin-CD29hiCD24+ population are multipotent and self-renewing, properties that define them as MaSCs.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells.

Elucidation of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that maintain mammary epithelial tissue integrity is of broad interest and paramount to the design of more effective treatments for breast cancer. Evidence from both in vitro and in vivo experiments suggests that mammary cell differentiation is a hierarchical process originating in an uncommitted stem cell with self-renewal potential. However, analysis of the properties and regulation of mammary stem cells has been limited by a lack of methods for their prospective isolation. Here we report the use of multi-parameter cell sorting and limiting dilution transplant analysis to demonstrate the purification of a rare subset of adult mouse mammary cells that are able individually to regenerate an entire mammary gland within 6 weeks in vivo while simultaneously executing up to ten symmetrical self-renewal divisions. These mammary stem cells are phenotypically distinct from and give rise to mammary epithelial progenitor cells that produce adherent colonies in vitro. The mammary stem cells are also a rapidly cycling population in the normal adult and have molecular features indicative of a basal position in the mammary epithelium.

Adipose Tissue↗

PubMed2005

Epithelial progenitors in the normal human mammary gland.

The human mammary gland is organized developmentally as a hierarchy of progenitor cells that become progressively restricted in their proliferative abilities and lineage options. Three types of human mammary epithelial cell progenitors are now identified. The first is thought to be a luminal-restricted progenitor; in vitro under conditions that support both luminal and myoepithelial cell differentiation, this cell produces clones of differentiating daughter cells that are exclusively positive for markers characteristic of luminal cells produced in vivo (i.e., keratins 8/18 and 19, epithelial cell adhesion molecule [EpCAM] and MUC1). The second type is a bipotent progenitor. It is identified by its ability to produce "mixed" colonies in single cell assays. These colonies contain a central core of cells expressing luminal markers surrounded by cells with a morphology and markers (e.g., keratin 14(+)) characteristic of myoepithelial cells. Serial passage in vitro of an enriched population of bipotent progenitors promotes the expansion of a third type of progenitor that is thought to be myoepithelial-restricted because it only produces cells with myoepithelial features. Luminal-restricted and bipotent progenitors can prospectively be isolated as distinct subpopulations from freshly dissociated suspensions of normal human mammary cells. Both are distinguished from many other cell types in mammary tissue by their expression of EpCAM and CD49f (alpha6 integrin). They are distinguished from each other by their differential expression of MUC1, which is expressed at much higher levels on the luminal progenitors. To relate the role of these progenitors to the generation of the three-dimensional tubuloalveolar structure of the mammary tree produced in vivo, we propose a model in which the commitment to the luminal versus the myoepithelial lineage may play a determining role in the generation of alveoli and ducts.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Enzymatic dissociation and culture of normal human mammary tissue to detect progenitor activity.

Normal human mammary tissue is composed of a glandular epithelium embedded within a fibrous and fatty stroma. Collagenase and hyaluronidase digestion of normal reduction mammoplasty specimens followed by differential centrifugation yields a suspension of single cells and cell aggregates that contain elements of the terminal ductal lobular units and stromal components of the mammary gland. The terminal ductal lobular units (TDLU) can be further dissociated to complete viable single-cell suspensions by treatment with trypsin, dispase II, and deoxyribonuclease I. These suspensions are suitable for cell separation and analysis in culture. Such studies indicate the existence of biologically distinct subpopulations of luminal-restricted, myoepithelial-restricted, and bipotent mammary epithelial progenitors detected by their ability to generate colonies of the corresponding progeny types in serum-free cultures. This review summarizes the methodology of the techniques required to generate and characterize the colonies obtained in vitro from these progenitors, as well as the special considerations and potential pitfalls associated with performing these protocols.

Animals↗