PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John V Moran

Publications and source records attributed to John V Moran.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Selective inhibition of Alu retrotransposition by APOBEC3G.

The non-LTR retrotransposon LINE-1 (L1) comprises approximately 17% of the human genome, and the L1-encoded proteins can function in trans to mediate the retrotransposition of non-autonomous retrotransposons (i.e., Alu and probably SVA elements) and cellular mRNAs to generate processed pseudogenes. Here, we have examined the effect of APOBEC3G and APOBEC3F, cytidine deaminases that inhibit Vif-deficient HIV-1 replication, on Alu retrotransposition and other L1-mediated retrotransposition processes. We demonstrate that APOBEC3G selectively inhibits Alu retrotransposition in an ORF1p-independent manner. An active cytidine deaminase site is not required for the inhibition of Alu retrotransposition and the resultant integration events lack G to A or C to T hypermutation. These data demonstrate a differential restriction of L1 and Alu retrotransposition by APOBEC3G, and suggest that the Alu ribonucleoprotein complex may be targeted by APOBEC3G.

APOBEC-3G Deaminase↗
PubMed2006

Characterization of pre-insertion loci of de novo L1 insertions.

The human Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) and the Short Interspersed Element (SINE) Alu comprise 28% of the human genome. They share the same L1-encoded endonuclease for insertion, which recognizes an A+T-rich sequence. Under a simple model of insertion distribution, this nucleotide preference would lead to the prediction that the populations of both elements would be biased towards A+T-rich regions. Genomic L1 elements do show an A+T-rich bias. In contrast, Alu is biased towards G+C-rich regions when compared to the genome average. Several analyses have demonstrated that relatively recent insertions of both elements show less G+C content bias relative to older elements. We have analyzed the repetitive element and G+C composition of more than 100 pre-insertion loci derived from de novo L1 insertions in cultured human cancer cells, which should represent an evolutionarily unbiased set of insertions. An A+T-rich bias is observed in the 50 bp flanking the endonuclease target site, consistent with the known target site for the L1 endonuclease. The L1, Alu, and G+C content of 20 kb of the de novo pre-insertion loci shows a different set of biases than that observed for fixed L1s in the human genome. In contrast to the insertion sites of genomic L1s, the de novo L1 pre-insertion loci are relatively L1-poor, Alu-rich and G+C neutral. Finally, a statistically significant cluster of de novo L1 insertions was localized in the vicinity of the c-myc gene. These results suggest that the initial insertion preference of L1, while A+T-rich in the initial vicinity of the break site, can be influenced by the broader content of the flanking genomic region and have implications for understanding the dynamics of L1 and Alu distributions in the human genome.

Alu Elements↗
PubMed2006

Cis-preferential LINE-1 reverse transcriptase activity in ribonucleoprotein particles.

LINE-1 retrotransposons (L1s) constitute approximately 17% of human DNA, and their activity continues to affect genome evolution. Retrotransposition-competent human L1s encode two proteins required for their mobility (ORF1p and ORF2p); however, biochemical activities associated with ORF2p have been difficult to detect in cells. Here, we show for the first time the colocalization of L1 RNA, ORF1p and ORF2p to a putative ribonucleoprotein retrotransposition intermediate. We further demonstrate that ORF2p preferentially uses its encoding RNA as a template for reverse transcription. Thus, our data provide the first biochemical evidence supporting the cis-preferential action of the L1 reverse transcriptase.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Cellular inhibitors of long interspersed element 1 and Alu retrotransposition.

Long interspersed element (LINE) 1 retrotransposons are major genomic parasites that represent approximately 17% of the human genome. The LINE-1 ORF2 protein is also responsible for the mobility of Alu elements, which constitute a further approximately 11% of genomic DNA. Representative members of each element class remain mobile, and deleterious retrotransposition events can induce spontaneous genetic diseases. Here, we demonstrate that APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B, two members of the APOBEC3 family of human innate antiretroviral resistance factors, can enter the nucleus, where LINE-1 and Alu reverse transcription occurs, and specifically inhibit both LINE-1 and Alu retrotransposition. These data suggest that the APOBEC3 protein family may have evolved, at least in part, to defend the integrity of the human genome against endogenous retrotransposons.

APOBEC Deaminases↗
PubMed2006

L1 retrotransposition in nondividing and primary human somatic cells.

Whether long interspersed element-1 (L1 or LINE-1) retrotransposition can occur in quiescent, nondividing, and/or terminally differentiated somatic cells has remained an unanswered fundamental question in human genetics. Here, we used a ubiquitously active phosphoglycerate kinase-1 promoter to drive the expression of a highly active human L1 element from an adenovirus-L1 hybrid vector. This vector system achieved retrotransposition in up to 91% of actively growing immortalized cells, and we demonstrated that L1 retrotransposition can be suppressed by the reverse transcriptase inhibitor 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine. This adenovirus vector enabled efficient delivery of the L1 element into differentiated primary human somatic cells and G1/S-arrested cells, resulting in retrotransposition in both cases; however, it was not detected in G0-arrested cells. Thus, these data indicate that L1 retrotransposition can occur in nondividing somatic cells.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2006

Unconventional translation of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons.

Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) retrotransposons encode proteins required for their mobility (ORF1p and ORF2p), yet little is known about how L1 mRNA is translated. Here, we show that ORF2 translation generally initiates from the first in-frame methionine codon of ORF2, and that both ORF1 and the inter-ORF spacer are dispensable for ORF2 translation. Remarkably, changing the ORF2 AUG codon to any other coding triplet is compatible with retrotransposition. However, introducing a premature termination codon in ORF1 or a thermostable hairpin in the inter-ORF spacer reduces ORF2p translation or L1 retrotransposition to approximately 5% of wild-type levels. Similar data obtained from "natural" and codon optimized "synthetic" mouse L1s lead us to propose that ORF2 is translated by an unconventional termination/reinitiation mechanism.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Multiple forms of genetic instability within a 2-Mb chromosomal segment of 3q26.3-q27 are associated with development of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Gene amplification is one of the mechanisms to activate oncogenes in many cancers, including esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). In the present study, we used two-dimensional restriction landmark genome scanning to clone a NotI/DpnII fragment that showed increased genomic dosage in 1 of 44 EAs analyzed. This fragment maps to 3q26.3-q27, and subsequent experiments identified two intrachromosomal amplicons within a 10-Mb DNA segment in 7 of 75 (9%) EAs. The distal amplified-core region maps centromeric to the PIK3CA locus, and a microsatellite (D3S1754) within this region exhibited significant instability (MSI), in stark contrast to the genomewide microsatellite stability found in EA. D3S1754-MSI arises in premalignant Barrett's dysplastic cells and preceded amplification of the nascent MSI allele in the corresponding EA. Seven ESTs within the amplified-core were overexpressed in amplicon-containing EAs. One of these, EST AW513672, represents a chimeric transcript that initiated from an antisense promoter sequence in the 5'UTR of a full-length LINE-1 element (L1-5'ASP). Similar chimeric transcripts encoding portions of the MET oncogene and the BCAS3 gene also were overexpressed in EAs, suggesting that L1-5'ASP activation may occur at a broad level in primary EAs. Thus, the fine dissection of a 2-Mb amplified DNA segment in 3q26.3-q27 in EA revealed multiple genetic alterations that had occurred sequentially and/or concurrently during EA development.

5' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed2005

Ribonucleoprotein particle formation is necessary but not sufficient for LINE-1 retrotransposition.

Long interspersed elements (LINE-1s or L1s) are abundant non-LTR retrotransposons that mobilize through an RNA intermediate by target site primed reverse transcription. The L1-encoded proteins (ORF1p and ORF2p) preferentially associate with their encoding transcript to form a ribonucleoprotein particle (RNP), which is a proposed retrotransposition intermediate. Here, we have used epitope tagging to discriminate the proteins encoded by engineered L1s from those encoded by endogenously expressed L1s. We demonstrate that an L1 containing an epitope tag at the carboxyl terminus of ORF1p remains retrotransposition-competent and that tagged ORF1p and its encoding RNA localize to cytoplasmic RNPs. We also identified two classes of ORF1p mutants, one that severely decreased RNP formation and blocked retrotransposition, and another that allows RNP formation but reduces retrotransposition by 100-fold. Thus, these data indicate that RNP formation is important but not sufficient for L1 retrotransposition and suggest that ORF1p also may function at downstream steps in the L1 retrotransposition pathway.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2005

Somatic mosaicism in neuronal precursor cells mediated by L1 retrotransposition.

Revealing the mechanisms for neuronal somatic diversification remains a central challenge for understanding individual differences in brain organization and function. Here we show that an engineered human LINE-1 (for long interspersed nuclear element-1; also known as L1) element can retrotranspose in neuronal precursors derived from rat hippocampus neural stem cells. The resulting retrotransposition events can alter the expression of neuronal genes, which, in turn, can influence neuronal cell fate in vitro. We further show that retrotransposition of a human L1 in transgenic mice results in neuronal somatic mosaicism. The molecular mechanism of action is probably mediated through Sox2, because a decrease in Sox2 expression during the early stages of neuronal differentiation is correlated with increases in both L1 transcription and retrotransposition. Our data therefore indicate that neuronal genomes might not be static, but some might be mosaic because of de novo L1 retrotransposition events.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Multiple fates of L1 retrotransposition intermediates in cultured human cells.

LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons comprise approximately 17% of human DNA, yet little is known about L1 integration. Here, we characterized 100 retrotransposition events in HeLa cells and show that distinct DNA repair pathways can resolve L1 cDNA retrotransposition intermediates. L1 cDNA resolution can lead to various forms of genetic instability including the generation of chimeric L1s, intrachromosomal deletions, intrachromosomal duplications, and intra-L1 rearrangements as well as a possible interchromosomal translocation. The L1 retrotransposition machinery also can mobilize U6 snRNA to new genomic locations, increasing the repertoire of noncoding RNAs that are mobilized by L1s. Finally, we have determined that the L1 reverse transcriptase can faithfully replicate its own transcript and has a base misincorporation error rate of approximately 1/7,000 bases. These data indicate that L1 retrotransposition in transformed human cells can lead to a variety of genomic rearrangements and suggest that host processes act to restrict L1 integration in cultured human cells. Indeed, the initial steps in L1 retrotransposition may define a host/parasite battleground that serves to limit the number of active L1s in the genome.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed2004

A YY1-binding site is required for accurate human LINE-1 transcription initiation.

The initial step in Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposition requires transcription from an internal promoter located within its 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR). Previous studies have identified a YY1 (Yin Yang 1)-binding site as an important sequence in LINE-1 transcription. Here, we demonstrate that mutations in the YY1-binding site have only minor effects on transcription activation of the full-length 5'-UTR and LINE-1 mobility in a single round cultured cell retrotransposition assay. Instead, these mutations disrupt proper initiation of transcription from the +1 site of the 5'-UTR. Thus, we propose that the YY1-binding site functions as a component of the LINE-1 core promoter to direct accurate transcription initiation. Indeed, this sequence may explain the evolutionary success of LINE-1 by enabling full-length retrotransposed copies to undergo autonomous retrotransposition in subsequent generations.

5' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed2004

Characterization of a mutagenic B1 retrotransposon insertion in the jittery mouse.

B1 elements are an abundant class of short interspersed elements (SINEs) in the mouse genome and mobilize by a process known as retrotransposition. Here, we report the characterization of a mutagenic B1 insertion into exon 4 of the Atcay gene, which was previously shown to be responsible for the jittery mouse. Mutations in the human ortholog of this gene, ATCAY, are responsible for Cayman ataxia. The B1 insertion is approximately 150-bp long, ends in a 45-50-bp polyadenylic acid (poly A) tail, is flanked by a perfect 13-bp target-site duplication, and is inserted into a sequence that resembles a LINE-1 endonuclease consensus cleavage site. Computational analysis indicates that the mutagenic insertion is most closely related to elements of the B1-C subfamily, and we have identified two possible progenitor B1 sequences on mouse chromosome 19. Together, these data demonstrate that B1 retrotransposition is ongoing in the mouse genome and is consistent with the hypothesis that the reverse transcriptase and endonuclease encoded by LINE-1 elements mediate B1 mobility.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Allelic heterogeneity in LINE-1 retrotransposition activity.

De novo LINE-1 (long interspersed element-1, or L1) retrotransposition events are responsible for approximately 1/1,000 disease-causing mutations in humans. Previously, L1.2 was identified as the likely progenitor of a mutagenic insertion in the factor VIII gene in a patient with hemophilia A. It subsequently was shown to be one of a small number of active L1s in the human genome. Here, we demonstrate that L1.2 is present at an intermediate insertion allele frequency in worldwide human populations and that common alleles (L1.2A and L1.2B) exhibit an approximately 16-fold difference in their ability to retrotranspose in cultured human HeLa cells. Chimera analysis revealed that two amino acid substitutions (S1259L and I1220M) downstream of the conserved cysteine-rich motif in L1 open reading frame 2 are largely responsible for the observed reduction in L1.2A retrotransposition efficiency. Thus, common L1 alleles can vary widely in their retrotransposition potential. We propose that such allelic heterogeneity can influence the potential L1 mutational load present in an individual genome.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population.

Although LINE-1 (long interspersed nucleotide element-1, L1) retrotransposons comprise 17% of the human genome, an exhaustive search of the December 2001 "freeze" of the haploid human genome working draft sequence (95% complete) yielded only 90 L1s with intact ORFs. We demonstrate that 38 of 86 (44%) L1s are polymorphic as to their presence in human populations. We cloned 82 (91%) of the 90 L1s and found that 40 of the 82 (49%) are active in a cultured cell retrotransposition assay. From these data, we predict that there are 80-100 retrotransposition-competent L1s in an average human being. Remarkably, 84% of assayed retrotransposition capability was present in six highly active L1s (hot L1s). By comparison, four of five full-length L1s involved in recent human insertions had retrotransposition activity comparable to the six hot L1s in the human genome working draft sequence. Thus, our data indicate that most L1 retrotransposition in the human population stems from hot L1s, with the remaining elements playing a lesser role in genome plasticity.

Alleles↗
PubMed2003

ATLAS: a system to selectively identify human-specific L1 insertions.

Retrotransposition of L1 LINEs (long interspersed elements) continues to sculpt the human genome. However, because recent insertions are dimorphic, they are not fully represented in sequence databases. Here, we have developed a system, termed "ATLAS" (amplification typing of L1 active subfamilies), that enables the selective amplification and display of DNA fragments containing the termini of human-specific L1s and their respective flanking sequences. We demonstrate that ATLAS is robust and that the resultant display patterns are highly reproducible, segregate in Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain pedigrees, and provide an individual-specific fingerprint. ATLAS also allows the identification of L1s that are absent from current genome databases, and we show that some of these L1s can retrotranspose at high frequencies in cultured human cells. Finally, we demonstrate that ATLAS also can identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms within a subset of older, primate-specific L1s. Thus, ATLAS provides a simple, high-throughput means to assess genetic variation associated with L1 retrotransposons.

5' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed2003

Mobile elements and mammalian genome evolution.

Mobile elements make up large portions of most eukaryotic genomes. They create genetic instability, not only through insertional mutation but also by contributing recombination substrates, both during and long after their insertion. The combination of whole-genome sequences and the development of innovative new assays to test the function of mobile elements have increased our understanding of how these elements mobilize and how their insertion impacts genome diversity and human disease.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Of man in mice.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acrosin↗