PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John W Beasley

Publications and source records attributed to John W Beasley.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Multiple user considerations and their implications in medical error reporting system design.

OBJECTIVE: The study examined the differences between physicians and clinical assistants in their preferences for a statewide medical error reporting system. BACKGROUND: Medical error reporting systems have been proposed as a means for studying the causes of medical error. Knowledge of user similarities and differences is needed for the development of design guidelines for medical error reporting systems. METHOD: Separate focus groups composed of 8 physicians and 6 clinical assistants (physician clinical support staff) were conducted. One-hour focus group meetings were conducted via toll-free teleconference lines one to two times per month for 9 months. All conversations were audiotaped and transcribed for analysis. An inductive content analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eighty-six major and minor themes emerged. Differences between physicians and clinical assistants included rules and regulations governing the use of the system, the medium of reporting, and aspects of the organization that may affect reporting levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although physicians and clinical assistants shared similar preferences and beliefs surrounding error reporting, there were differences that need to be considered if medical error reporting systems are to be effective. APPLICATION: To successfully deploy a medical error reporting system, the system itself must be designed for the potential users. This study uncovered previously underappreciated issues that should be incorporated into the design and implementation process. Actual or potential applications of this research include the improvement of the design and implementation of medical error reporting systems to account for the needs of different types of users.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2005

Toward a theoretical approach to medical error reporting system research and design.

The release of the Institute of Medicine (Kohn et al., 2000) report "To Err is Human", brought attention to the problem of medical errors, which led to a concerted effort to study and design medical error reporting systems for the purpose of capturing and analyzing error data so that safety interventions could be designed. However, to make real gains in the efficacy of medical error or event reporting systems, it is necessary to begin developing a theory of reporting systems adoption and use and to understand how existing theories may play a role in explaining adoption and use. This paper presents the results of a 9-month study exploring the barriers and facilitators for the design of a statewide medical error reporting system and discusses how several existing theories of technology acceptance, adoption and implementation fit with many of the results. In addition we present an integrated theoretical model of medical error reporting system design and implementation.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2004

Design elements for a primary care medical error reporting system.

PROBLEM CONSIDERED: State and federal initiatives to develop medical error reporting systems are being proposed. For these to lead to an effective error reporting system to improve primary care, the needs of primary care professionals must be understood. METHODS: This study was based on the answers to key questions directed at primary care physicians and clinical assistants. A series of focus groups was held to determine what elements need to be included in the design of a medical error reporting system for ambulatory care. RESULTS: Participants addressed the purposes of an error reporting system, the barriers and motivators to the use of a system, the types of events that should be reported, how the reporting should be done, and how the data should be analyzed and used. During the sessions, 87 different themes emerged that were distilled down to the general principles and operating design elements deemed most important. CONCLUSIONS: The participating physicians and clinical assistants supported a primary care medical error reporting system designed to provide useful information to improve health care. The system should not be punitive.

Focus Groups↗
PubMed2004

Quality of work life of family physicians in Wisconsin's health care organizations: a WReN study.

PROBLEM CONSIDERED: Most family physicians in Wisconsin are employed by large health care organizations. Because of its impact on physician recruitment, retention, commitment to the organization, and patient care, the quality of physician work life is an important problem. METHODS: A survey was designed based on a literature review and augmented by focus group data. It was sent to all 1482 members of the Wisconsin Academy of Family Physicians in 2000. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 47%. Three hundred ninety-seven of the respondents were employed by 18 different health care organizations having 10 or more respondents. There were significant differences among Wisconsin's health care organizations in terms of physicians' satisfaction with their organization. There was a strong significant negative correlation between satisfaction with one's organization and turnover intention and a strong positive correlation between satisfaction with one's organization and ability to achieve one's professional goals. There were also significant, though less strong, correlations between satisfaction with one's organization and satisfaction with being a physician and perceived quality of care delivered. CONCLUSIONS: Some of Wisconsin's health care organizations are doing better than others at working with their family physicians to maximize these physicians' satisfaction with the organization, reduce the likelihood of turnover, and enable them to reach their professional goals.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO) program: fourteen years of progress.

BACKGROUND: The Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO) program is a highly structured, evidence-based, two-day course designed to provide healthcare professionals with the knowledge and skills to manage the emergency conditions that can occur during childbirth. OBJECTIVES: To document the number of ALSO-trained clinicians and instructors in the United States and internationally and to promote ALSO training among prehospital and disaster medicine professionals. METHODS: Records maintained by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) for each country where ALSO is taught were reviewed for: (1) the years and locations of the ALSO courses; (2) the number of ALSO-trained caregivers; and (3) the number of ALSO instructors. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2005, 54,071 ALSO-trained caregivers and 2,251 instructors have completed provider and instructor ALSO courses in 25 countries. Of these, 17,755 caregivers and 1,220 instructors are from outside the United States. CONCLUSION: The ALSO program is a popular, multi-disciplinary course for preparing maternity caregivers to manage obstetric emergencies. Limited evidence suggests it can be effective and efficient in enhancing the knowledge and skills of prehospital and disaster medicine clinicians. Hong Kong provides a model in which emergency physicians have taken the lead in promoting the ALSO course. As the ALSO program expands, additional research is needed to assess its impact on educational and health outcomes.

Advanced Cardiac Life Support↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Quality of work life of independent vs employed family physicians in Wisconsin: a WReN study.

PURPOSE: Family physicians in Wisconsin who are mainly employed by large health care organizations have voiced concerns regarding the quality of their work lives. We explored the quality of work life and its relationship to employment by health care organizations. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of the 1,482 active members of the Wisconsin Academy of Family Physicians in 2000. RESULTS: A 47% overall response rate was obtained, and 584 respondents could be identified as independent or employed by a health care organization. There were no differences in age or sex between the 2 groups. The independent physicians worked longer hours, were in smaller work groups, and had been in practice longer and in their current practice longer than the employed physicians. Independent physicians reported better working relationships, more satisfaction with family time, more influence over management decisions, better satisfaction with being a physician, better perceived quality of the care they provided, greater ability to achieve professional goals, and lesser intention to leave the practice. CONCLUSIONS: Independent physicians have significantly more positive ratings of several aspects of the quality of their work life compared with physicians employed by health care organizations. Health care organizations need to address these issues if they are to have a satisfied and stable workforce.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMedDate not supplied

How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study.

PURPOSE: The number of problems managed concurrently by family physicians during patient encounters has not been fully explored despite the implications for quality assessment, guideline implementation, education, research, administration, and funding. Our study objective was to determine the number of problems physicians report managing at each visit and compare that with the number reflected in the chart and the bill. METHODS: Twenty-nine members of the Wisconsin Research Network reported on encounters with 572 patients using a physician problem log. The patient chart notes and the diagnoses submitted for billing from the encounters were compared with the information in these logs. RESULTS: The physicians reported managing an average of 3.05 problems per encounter and recorded 2.82 in the chart and 1.97 on the bill. For all patients, 37% of encounters addressed more than 3 problems, and 18% addressed more than 4. For patients older than 65 years, there was an average of 3.88 problems at each visit, and for diabetic patients there was an average of 4.60. There was evidence for the selective omission of mental health and substance problems from the diagnoses used for billing. CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine involves the concurrent care of multiple problems, which billing data do not adequately reflect. Our findings suggest a mismatch between family medicine and current approaches to quality assessment, guideline implementation, education, research, administration, and funding. Activities in all these areas need to address the physician's task of prioritizing and integrating care for multiple problems concurrently.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Radiographs in the office: is a second reading always needed?

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the frequency, nature, and importance of the changes in patient care that occurred as a result of differences in outpatient radiograph readings for cases in which the primary care clinician, hypothetically, would not request a second reading by a radiologist. METHODS: During 4 months, 1393 pairs of radiographic readings were collected from 9 volunteer primary care practices with 86 clinicians and a second reading by one of 42 radiologists. For 553, hypothetically, the clinician would not request a consultation from a radiologist. Review analysis of the 553 pairs revealed 100 (18.1%) radiographs in which the radiologist's reading did not agree with the clinician's reading. Data from the original visit and subsequent related care were abstracted from patient charts and reviewed. Changes in clinical care resulting from the radiologist's reading were identified. RESULTS: The radiologists' second reading of these 553 sets of radiographs resulted in 14 (2.5% of 553 and 14% of 100) cases of one or more changes in care. We found 38 documented or presumed changes in care and zero substantial changes in care. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care clinicians are able to identify radiographs for which a second reading by a radiologist will not result in substantial changes in care.

Clinical Competence↗