Biomedical subjects

John W Huffman

Publications and source records attributed to John W Huffman.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

1-Alkyl-2-aryl-4-(1-naphthoyl)pyrroles: new high affinity ligands for the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors.

Two series of 1-alkyl-2-aryl-4-(1-naphthoyl)pyrroles were synthesized and their affinities for the cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors were determined. In the 2-phenyl series (5) the N-alkyl group was varied from n-propyl to n-heptyl. A second series of 23 1-pentyl-2-aryl-4-(1-naphthoyl)-pyrroles (6) was also prepared. Several compounds in both series have CB(1) receptor affinities in the 6-30nM range. The high affinities of these pyrrole derivatives relative to JWH-030 (1, R=C(5)H(11)) support the hypothesis that these pyrroles interact with the CB(1) receptor primarily by aromatic stacking.

Binding, Competitive↗

PubMed2006

Synthesis and pharmacology of 11-nor-1-methoxy-9-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinols and 11-nor-1-deoxy-9-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinols: new selective ligands for the cannabinoid CB2 receptor.

Fourteen novel CB2 receptor selective cannabinoids were synthesized via initial Lewis acid catalyzed rearrangement of resorcinol precursors to obtain the cannabinoid moiety. These are the 1-methoxy-9-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinols and the 1-deoxy-9-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinols, with 1',1'-dimethylalkyl side chains of four to seven carbon atoms at C-3 of the cannabinoid nucleus. The cannabinols synthesized and described in this paper all exhibit greater affinity for the CB2 receptor than for the CB1 receptor. Exceptionally high CB2 affinity was observed for 1-deoxy-9beta-hydroxy-dimethylhexylhexahydrocannabinol (JWH-361, 9, n = 3) K(i) = 2.7 nM and 1-deoxy-9beta-hydroxydimethylpentylhexahydrocannabinol (JWH-300, 9, n = 2) K(i) = 5.3 nM. In general, the stereochemistry of the 9-hydroxy group is important and the beta-orientation enhances both CB2 receptor affinity and selectivity.

Cannabinol↗

PubMed2005

1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles, a new class of cannabimimetic indoles.

A new class of cannabimimetic indoles, with 3-phenylacetyl or substituted 3-phenylacetyl substituents, has been prepared and their affinities for the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors have been determined. In general those compounds with a 2-substituted phenylacetyl group have good affinity for both receptors. The 4-substituted analogs have little affinity for either receptor, while the 3-substituted compounds are intermediate in their affinities. Two of these compounds, 1-pentyl-3-(2-methylphenylacetyl)indole (JWH-251) and 1-pentyl-3-(3-methoxyphenylacetyl)indole (JWH-302), have 5-fold selectivity for the CB1 receptor with modest affinity for the CB2 receptor. GTPgammaS determinations indicate that both compounds are highly efficacious agonists at the CB1 receptor and partial agonists at the CB2 receptor.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2005

Enantioselective synthesis of 1-methoxy- and 1-deoxy-2'-methyl-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinols: new selective ligands for the CB2 receptor.

Two new series of cannabinoids were prepared and their affinities for the CB1 and CB2 receptors were determined. These series are the (2'R)- and (2'S)-1-methoxy- and 1-deoxy-3-(2'-methylalkyl)-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinols, with alkyl side chains of three to seven carbon atoms. These compounds were prepared by a route that employed the enantioselective synthesis of the resorcinol precursors to the cannabinoid ring system. All of these compounds have greater affinity for the CB2 receptor than the CB1 receptor and four of them, (2'R)-1-methoxy-3-(2'-methylbutyl)-delta8-THC (JWH-359), (2'S)-1-deoxy-3-(2'-methylbutyl)-delta8-THC (JWH-352), (2'S)-1-deoxy-3-(2'-methylpentyl)-delta8-THC (JWH-255), and (2'R)-1-deoxy-3-(2'-methylpentyl)-delta8-THC (JWH-255), have good affinity (K(i) = 13-47 nM) for the CB2 receptor and little affinity (K(i) = 1493 to >10,000 nM) for the CB1 receptor. In the 1-deoxy-3-(2'-methylalkyl)-delta8-THC series, the 2'S-methyl compounds in general have greater affinity for the CB2 receptor than the corresponding 2'R isomers.

Dronabinol↗

PubMed2005

Structure-activity relationships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric and electronic effects of naphthoyl substituents. New highly selective CB(2) receptor agonists.

In an effort to improve indole-based CB(2) cannabinoid receptor ligands and also to develop SAR for both the CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, 47 indole derivatives were prepared and their CB(1) and CB(2) receptor affinities were determined. The indole derivatives include 1-propyl- and 1-pentyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles both with and without a 2-methyl substituent. Naphthoyl substituents include 4- and 7-alkyl groups as well as 2-, 4-, 6-, 7-methoxy and 4-ethoxy groups. The effects of these substituents on receptor affinities are discussed and structure-activity relationships are presented. In the course of this work three new highly selective CB(2) receptor agonists were identified, 1-propyl-3-(4-methyl-1-naphthoylindole (JWH-120), 1-propyl-2-methyl-3-(6-methoxy-1-naphthoylindole (JWH-151), and 1-pentyl-3-(2-methoxy-1-naphthoylindole (JWH-267). GTPgammaS assays indicated that JWH-151 is a full agonist at CB(2), while JWH-120 and JWH-267 are partial agonists. Molecular modeling and receptor docking studies were carried out on a set of 3-(4-propyl-1-naphthoyl)indoles, a set of 3-(6-methoxy-1-naphthoyl)indoles and the pair of N-pentyl-3-(2-methoxy-1-naphthoyl)indoles. Docking studies indicated that the CB(1) receptor affinities of these compounds were consistent with their aromatic stacking interactions in the aromatic microdomain of the CB(1) receptor.

Alkylation↗

PubMed2003

Structure-activity relationships for 1',1'-dimethylalkyl-Delta8-tetrahydrocannabinols.

A series of 1',1'-dimethylalkyl-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol analogues with C-3 side chains of 2-12 carbon atoms has been synthesized and their in vitro and in vivo pharmacology has been evaluated. The lowest member of the series, 1',1'-dimethylethyl-Delta(8)-THC (8, n=0) has good affinity for the CB(1) receptor, but is inactive in vivo. The dimethylpropyl (8, n=1) through dimethyldecyl (8, n=8) all have high affinity for the CB(1) receptor and are full agonists in vivo. 1',1'-Dimethylundecyl-Delta(8)-THC (8, n=9) has significant affinity for the receptor (K(i)=25.8+/-5.8 nM), but has reduced potency in vivo. The dodecyl analogue (8, n=10) has little affinity for the CB(1) receptor and is inactive in vivo. A quantitative structure-activity relationship study of the side chain region of these compounds is consistent with the concept that for optimum affinity and potency the side chain must be of a length which will permit its terminus to loop back in proximity to the phenolic ring of the cannabinoid.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

3-Indolyl-1-naphthylmethanes: new cannabimimetic indoles provide evidence for aromatic stacking interactions with the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor.

A series of 1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl-(1-naphthyl)methanes (9-11) and 2-methyl-1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl-(1-naphthyl)methanes (12-14) have been synthesized to investigate the hypothesis that cannabimimetic 3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles interact with the CB(1) receptor by hydrogen bonding to the carbonyl group. Indoles 9-11 have significant (K(i)=17-23nM) receptor affinity, somewhat less than that of the corresponding naphthoylindoles (5, 15, 16). 2-Methyl-1-indoles 12-14 have little affinity for the CB(1) receptor, in contrast to 2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles 17-19, which have affinities comparable to those of 5, 15, 16. A cannabimimetic indene hydrocarbon (26) was synthesized and found to have K(i)=26+/-4nM. Molecular modeling and receptor docking studies of naphthoylindole 16, its 2-methyl congener (19) and indolyl-1-naphthylmethanes 11 and 14, combined with the receptor affinities of these cannabimimetic indoles, strongly suggest that these cannabinoid receptor ligands bind primarily by aromatic stacking interactions in the transmembrane helix 3-4-5-6 region of the CB(1) receptor.

Cannabinoids↗

PubMed2003

Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis by cannabinoids.

Cannabinoids, the active components of marijuana and their derivatives, induce tumor regression in rodents (8). However, the mechanism of cannabinoid antitumoral action in vivo is as yet unknown. Here we show that local administration of a nonpsychoactive cannabinoid to mice inhibits angiogenesis of malignant gliomas as determined by immunohistochemical analyses and vascular permeability assays. In vitro and in vivo experiments show that at least two mechanisms may be involved in this cannabinoid action: the direct inhibition of vascular endothelial cell migration and survival as well as the decrease of the expression of proangiogenic factors (vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-2 in the tumors. Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis may allow new strategies for the design of cannabinoid-based antitumoral therapies.

Angiogenesis Inducing Agents↗

PubMed2003

Inhibition of skin tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo by activation of cannabinoid receptors.

Nonmelanoma skin cancer is one of the most common malignancies in humans. Different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of these tumors are currently being investigated. Given the growth-inhibiting effects of cannabinoids on gliomas and the wide tissue distribution of the two subtypes of cannabinoid receptors (CB(1) and CB(2)), we studied the potential utility of these compounds in anti-skin tumor therapy. Here we show that the CB(1) and the CB(2) receptor are expressed in normal skin and skin tumors of mice and humans. In cell culture experiments pharmacological activation of cannabinoid receptors induced the apoptotic death of tumorigenic epidermal cells, whereas the viability of nontransformed epidermal cells remained unaffected. Local administration of the mixed CB(1)/CB(2) agonist WIN-55,212-2 or the selective CB(2) agonist JWH-133 induced a considerable growth inhibition of malignant tumors generated by inoculation of epidermal tumor cells into nude mice. Cannabinoid-treated tumors showed an increased number of apoptotic cells. This was accompanied by impairment of tumor vascularization, as determined by altered blood vessel morphology and decreased expression of proangiogenic factors (VEGF, placental growth factor, and angiopoietin 2). Abrogation of EGF-R function was also observed in cannabinoid-treated tumors. These results support a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of skin tumors.

Angiogenesis Inducing Agents↗

PubMed2002

1-Methoxy-, 1-deoxy-11-hydroxy- and 11-hydroxy-1-methoxy-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinols: new selective ligands for the CB2 receptor.

Three series of new cannabinoids were prepared and their affinities for the CB(1) and CB(2) cannabinoid recptors were determined. These are the 1-methoxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylalkyl)-, 1-deoxy-11-hydroxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylalkyl)- and 11-hydroxy-1-methoxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylalkyl)-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinols, which contain alkyl chains from dimethylethyl to dimethylheptyl appended to C-3 of the cannabinoid. All of these compounds have greater affinity for the CB(2) receptor than for the CB(1) receptor, however only 1-methoxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylhexyl)-Delta(8)-THC (JWH-229, 6e) has effectively no affinity for the CB(1) receptor (K(i)=3134+/-110nM) and high affinity for CB(2) (K(i)=18+/-2nM).

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Decrease in efficacy and potency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by chronic delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol administration.

Cannabinoids have been shown to increase the release of arachadonic acid, whereas nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to decrease the analgesic effects of cannabinoids. We evaluated the antinociceptive effects of chronic administration of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), anandamide (an endogenous cannabinoid), arachadonic acid, ethanolamine, and methanandamide on several NSAIDs via p.o. and/or i.p. routes of administration using the mouse p-phenylquinone (PPQ) test, a test for visceral nociception. Our studies with a cannabinoid receptor (CB1) antagonist [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboximide hydrochloride (SR141716A)], a CB2 antagonist [N-((1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl-bicyclo-heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide) (SR144528)], and an another CB2 agonist [1,1-dimethylbutyl-1-deoxy-Delta(9)-THC (JWH-133)] were performed to better characterize PPQ interactions with cannabinoid receptors. The acute affects of Delta(9)-THC were blocked by SR141716A (i.p.) and partially blocked by SR144528 (i.p.). When NSAIDs (p.o.) were administered, the ED(50) values were as follows: 23 mg/kg aspirin, 3 mg/kg indomethacin, 5 mg/kg celecoxib, 3 mg/kg ketorolac, 57 mg/kg acetaminophen (32.3-99.8), and 0.8 mg/kg diclofenac (0.1-4.9). In animals given chronic Delta(9)-THC, only diclofenac and acetaminophen were active. Conversely, chronic methanandamide (i.p.) did not alter the antinociceptive effects of the NSAIDs. Neither the CB1 or CB2 antagonist blocked the effects of the NSAIDs. The effects of chronic arachadonic acid, ethanolamine, and anandamide could not be evaluated. In summary, our data indicate that chronic Delta(9)-THC alters the cyclooxygenase system. Alternatively, the data suggest that this alteration is not due to chronic endogenous cannabinoid release. Based upon these data, we hypothesize that human subjects who are chronic users of Delta(9)-THC may not respond to analgesic treatment with the above NSAIDs.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Paradoxical pharmacological effects of deoxy-tetrahydrocannabinol analogs lacking high CB1 receptor affinity.

The present study investigated the role of peripheral cannabinoid (CB(2)) receptors in producing hypomobility, antinociception and hypothermia in mice. Results revealed that the CB(2)-selective antagonist, SR144528, did not block cannabimimetic effects of a potent delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) analog in mice. While most of a series of CB(2)-selective 1-deoxy-THC analogs were active in vivo only if they also had good affinity for CB(1) receptors, four of these analogs showed in vivo activity even though their affinities for CB(1) receptors were poor. Further, this activity was blocked by the CB(1) antagonist SR141716A, but not by SR144528. One of the deoxy analogs also stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, an effect that was blocked by SR141716A. These results provide further evidence that these cannabimimetic effects are not mediated through action at CB(2) receptors. In addition, some of these analogs may be very low efficacy agonists at CB(1) receptors that act as full agonists in vivo, but lack the ability to displace high affinity and high efficacy binding ligands in vitro.

Animals↗