PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

John Wozney

Publications and source records attributed to John Wozney.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The effect of rhBMP-2 around endosseous implants with and without membranes in the canine model.

BACKGROUND: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is a potent differentiating agent for cells of the osteoblastic lineage. It has been used in the oral cavity under a variety of indications and with different carriers. However, the optimal carrier for each indication is not known. This study examined a synthetic bioabsorbable carrier for BMP used in osseous defects around dental implants in the canine mandible. METHODS: Twelve canines had their mandibular four premolars and first molar teeth extracted bilaterally. After 5 months, four implants were placed with standardized circumferential defects around the coronal 4 mm of each implant. One-half of the defects received a polylactide/glycolide (PLGA) polymer carrier with or without recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2), and the other half received a collagen carrier with or without rhBMP-2. Additionally, one-half of the implants were covered with a non-resorbable (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [ePTFE]) membrane to exclude soft tissues. Animals were sacrificed either 4 or 12 weeks later. Histomorphometric analysis included the percentage of new bone contact with the implant, the area of new bone, and the percentage of defect fill. This article describes results with the PLGA carrier. RESULTS: All implants demonstrated clinical and radiographic success with the amount of new bone formed dependent on the time and presence/absence of rhBMP-2 and presence/absence of a membrane. The percentage of bone-to-implant contact was greater with rhBMP-2, and after 12 weeks of healing, there was approximately one-third of the implant contacting bone in the defect site. After 4 weeks, the presence of a membrane appeared to slow new bone area formation. The percentage of fill in membrane-treated sites with rhBMP-2 rose from 24% fill to 42% after 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. Without rhBMP-2, the percentage of fill was 14% rising to 36% fill, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After 4 weeks, the rhBMP-2-treated sites had a significantly higher percentage of contact, more new bone area, and higher percentage of defect fill than the sites without rhBMP-2. After 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in sites with or without rhBMP-2 regarding percentage of contact, new bone area, or percentage of defect fill. In regard to these three outcomes, comparing the results with this carrier to the results reported earlier with a collagen carrier in this study, only the area of new bone was significantly different with the collagen carrier resulting in greater bone than the PLGA carrier. Thus, the PLGA carrier for rhBMP-2 significantly stimulated bone formation around dental implants in this model after 1 month but not after 3 months of healing. The use of this growth factor and carrier combination appears to stimulate early bone healing events around the implants but not quite to the same degree as a collagen carrier.

Absorbable Implants↗
PubMed2002

Bone morphogenetic protein delivery systems.

STUDY DESIGN: A review was conducted. OBJECTIVES: To review the rationale for the use of carrier systems to deliver bone morphogenetic proteins to sites of orthopedic repair, and to discuss commonly used carriers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Carriers for bone morphogenetic protein in spine fusion are used to increase the retention of these osteogenic factors at the treatment site, and to serve as an osteoconductive matrix for bone forming cells while maintaining a space or volume in which bone formation can occur. METHODS: The literature is reviewed and discussed. RESULTS: Although bone morphogenetic proteins can induce bone formation when delivered in formulation buffer in small animal models, carriers often are used in larger animal models and human clinical trials to maintain the concentration of osteogenic factors at the treatment site for a sufficient period to allow bone-forming cells to migrate to the area of injury and to proliferate and differentiate. For spine fusion, carriers also are required to serve as an osteoconductive matrix for bone-forming cells while maintaining a space or volume in which bone formation can occur. Four major categories of carrier materials are used for osteogenic factor delivery: inorganic materials, synthetic polymers, natural polymers, and composites of the first three materials. In addition, allograft bone has been used to deliver osteogenic factors to the site of orthopedic repairs. The efficacy of osteogenic carrier combinations often is site specific and species specific. The requirement for supraphysiologic concentrations of osteogenic factors may be related to the ability of the delivery system to increase the retention time at the treatment site and overcome tight regulation of these factors by their inhibitors. Dose escalation in large animal models also may be related to a decrease in the number of responding cells and a slower rate of bone formation. New delivery systems being evaluated include depot delivery systems, viral vector systems, conjugated osteogenic factor delivery systems, and oral small molecule targets. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery systems play an important role in the use of osteogenic factors to augment spine fusions and other orthopedic repairs.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Clinical evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 is an osteoinductive protein that plays a pivotal role in bone growth and regeneration. Several hundred studies were conducted in the past 7 years in numerous animal models to establish unequivocally the efficacy, safety, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and surgical handling properties of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, building a solid foundation for clinical development programs. Pilot clinical trials have shown the feasibility and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 treatment, and defined the effective dose for its use in open long bone fractures and for augmentation or preservation of the alveolar bone in the dental ridge. Prospective observational clinical studies helped define clinical efficacy end points, identify significant variables, and estimate appropriate population sample size for pivotal clinical trials. Pivotal clinical trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 are underway in patients with open tibial shaft fractures and in patients with a deficiency of the alveolar ridge.

Animals↗