PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jon A. McCleverty

Publications and source records attributed to Jon A. McCleverty.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Roles of Bridging Ligand Topology and Conformation in Controlling Exchange Interactions between Paramagnetic Molybdenum Fragments in Dinuclear and Trinuclear Complexes.

The magnetic properties of two series of dinuclear complexes, and one trinuclear complex, have been examined as a function of the bridging pathway between the metal centers. The first series of dinuclear complexes is [{Mo(V)(O)(Tp)Cl}(2)(&mgr;-OO)], where "OO" is [1,4-O(C(6)H(4))(n)O](2)(-) (n = 1, 1; n = 2, 3), [4,4'-O(C(6)H(3)-2-Me)(2)O](2)(-) (4), or [1,3-OC(6)H(4)O](2)(-) (2) [Tp = tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)hydroborate]. The second series of dinuclear complexes is [{Mo(I)(NO)(Tp)Cl}(2)(&mgr;-NN)], where "NN" is 4,4'-bipyridyl (5), 3,3'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridine (6), 3,8-phenanthroline (7), or 2,7-diazapyrene (8). The trinuclear complex is [{Mo(V)(O)(Tp)Cl}(3)(1,3,5-C(6)H(3)O(3))] (9), whose crystal structure was determined [9.5CH(2)Cl(2): C(56)H(81)B(3)Cl(13)Mo(3)N(18)O(6); monoclinic, P2(1)/n; a = 13.443, b = 41.46(2), c = 14.314(6) Å; beta = 93.21(3) degrees; V = 7995(5) Å(3); Z = 4; R(1) = 0.106]. In these complexes, the sign and magnitude of the exchange coupling constant J is clearly related to both the topology and the conformation of the bridging ligand [where J is derived from H = -JS(1)().S(2)() for 1-8 and H = -J(S(1)().S(2)() + S(2)().S(3)() + S(1)().S(3)()) for 9]. The values are as follows: 1, -80 cm(-)(1); 2, +9.8 cm(-)(1); 3, -13.2 cm(-)(1); 4, -2.8 cm(-)(1); 5, -33 cm(-)(1); 6, -3.5 cm(-)(1); 7, -35.6 cm(-)(1); 8, -35.0 cm(-)(1); 9, +14.4 cm(-)(1). In particular the following holds: (1) J is negative (antiferromagnetic exchange) across the para-substituted bridges ligands of 1 and 3-8 but positive (ferromagnetic exchange) across the meta-substituted bridging ligands of 2 and 9. (2) J decreases in magnitude dramatically as the bridging ligand conformation changes from planar to twisted (compare 3 and 4, or 6 and 8). These observations are consistent with a spin-polarization mechanism for the exchange interaction, propagated across the pi-system of the bridging ligand by via overlap of bridging ligand p(pi) orbitals with the d(pi) magnetic orbitals of the metals. The EPR spectrum of 9 is characteristic of a quartet species and shows weak Deltam(s) = 2 and Deltam(s) = 3 transitions at one-half and one-third, respectively, of the field strength of the principal Deltam(s) = 1 component.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

A Triangular Copper(I) Complex Displaying Allosteric Cooperativity in Its Electrochemical Behavior and a Mixed-Valence Cu(I)-Cu(I)-Cu(II) State with Unusual Temperature-Dependent Behavior.

Reaction of the tris-chelating hexadentate podand ligand tris[3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-yl]hydroborate (Tp(Py)) with [Cu(MeCN)(4)][PF(6)] affords [Cu(I)(3)(Tp(Py))(2)][PF(6)] (1), which was crystallographically characterized. 1.(MeCN)(2): C(52)H(44)B(2)Cu(3)F(6)N(20)P, orthorhombic, Pna2(1); a = 24.592(7), b = 16.392(5), c = 13.365(5) Å; Z = 4. Each Cu(I) ion is four coordinated by one N,N '-bidentate arm from each ligand; each ligand therefore donates each bidentate arm to a different Cu(I) ion. The isosceles triangular arrangement of Cu(I) ions with N-donor ligands is reminiscent of the tricopper(I) site of ascorbate oxidase. One-electron oxidation of 1 affords the Cu(I)(2)Cu(II) complex [Cu(3)(Tp(Py))(2)][PF(6)](2) (2). The potentials of the Cu(I)/Cu(II) redox couples are affected by the ease with which the accompanying geometric rearrangement can occur. Thus, the first oxidation of 1 is facile (-0.52 V vs the ferrocene/ferrocenium couple, Fc/Fc(+)), but as a result of the concomitant structural rearrangement the second oxidation is rendered much more difficult (+0.12 V vsFc/Fc(+)) and results in slow decomposition of the product. A third oxidation does not occur at accessible potentials. This complex therefore exhibits negative cooperative behavior, in which the geometric change accompanying one metal-based redox change hinders further redox changes at other sites via an allosteric effect. EPR studies on the mixed-valence complex 2 show that in frozen glasses below 120 K the unpaired electron is delocalized over two metal centers (7-line spectrum), but above 160 K the electron becomes localized and gives a simple axial spectrum. The electronic spectrum of 2 in solution shows an intense band at 910 nm (epsilon 2100 dm(3) mol(-)(1) cm(-)(1)) which we believe to be an IVCT band. The combination of EPR and electronic spectral studies show that 2 is class III (fully delocalized over 2 centers) below 120 K but class II (localized but strongly interacting) at higher temperatures.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Solvatochromism of Mono- and Dimolybdenum Coordination Compounds of Dipyridyloctatetraene and Linear Solvation Energy Relationship Models Based on the Kamlet-Taft and Drago Scales of Solvent Polarity.

The heteroleptic molybdenum complexes [{Mo(NO)TpX}(n)()(L-L)] [Tp = HB(3,5-Me(2)C(3)HN(2))(3); X = Cl, I; L-L = 4-NC(5)H(4)(CH=CH)(4)C(5)H(4)N-4', n = 1, 2; X = Cl; L-L = {4,4'-NC(5)H(4)CH=CHC(Me)=CHCH=}(2), n = 2] have a low energy absorbance in their electronic spectra which exhibits solvatochromic shifts. These have been analyzed quantitatively by means of linear solvation energy relationships based on Kamlet-Taft solvatochromism parameters, as well as on Drago's "unified scale of solvent polarity". Each of these approaches leads to satisfactory linear models, in qualitative agreement with one another. The solvatochromism is due to a combination of increased solvent dipolarity/polarizability and solvent-to-solute hydrogen bonding, each preferentially stabilizing polar ground states compared with less polar excited states. The latter originate from metal-to-ligand charge transfer. Quantitatively, the Drago and Kamlet-Taft models differ somewhat. The former are statistically slightly better than those based on Kamlet-Taft parameters.

Journal Article↗