PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jon E Ness

Publications and source records attributed to Jon E Ness.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Predicting enzyme function from protein sequence.

There are two main reasons to try to predict an enzyme's function from its sequence. The first is to identify the components and thus the functional capabilities of an organism, the second is to create enzymes with specific properties. Genomics, expression analysis, proteomics and metabonomics are largely directed towards understanding how information flows from DNA sequence to protein functions within an organism. This review focuses on information flow in the opposite direction: the applicability of what is being learned from natural enzymes to improve methods for catalyst design.

Animals↗

Engineered protein function by selective amino acid diversification.

Almost all protein engineering methods rely upon making changes to naturally occurring proteins that already possess some of the desired properties. This will probably remain the case as long as we lack a complete understanding of the way that an amino acid sequence gives rise to a protein with a precisely defined biological function. Common to all methods for altering an existing protein is the selection of a subset of amino acids in the protein for variation and a choice of which substitutions to make at each position. Variants are then tested empirically and further variants are created based upon their performance. Differences between protein engineering methods are the ways in which amino acids are chosen for variation, the protocols followed for creating the variants, and how information regarding variant properties is used in creating subsequent variants. In this article, we describe these differences and provide examples of how the experimental parameters of specific projects determine which method is most suitable.

Amino Acids↗

Evolutionary potential of (beta/alpha)8-barrels: functional promiscuity produced by single substitutions in the enolase superfamily.

The members of the mechanistically diverse, (beta/alpha)(8)-barrel fold-containing enolase superfamily evolved from a common progenitor but catalyze different reactions using a conserved partial reaction. The molecular pathway for natural divergent evolution of function in the superfamily is unknown. We have identified single-site mutants of the (beta/alpha)(8)-barrel domains in both the l-Ala-d/l-Glu epimerase from Escherichia coli (AEE) and the muconate lactonizing enzyme II from Pseudomonas sp. P51 (MLE II) that catalyze the o-succinylbenzoate synthase (OSBS) reaction as well as the wild-type reaction. These enzymes are members of the MLE subgroup of the superfamily, share conserved lysines on opposite sides of their active sites, but catalyze acid- and base-mediated reactions with different mechanisms. A comparison of the structures of AEE and the OSBS from E. coli was used to design the D297G mutant of AEE; the E323G mutant of MLE II was isolated from directed evolution experiments. Although neither wild-type enzyme catalyzes the OSBS reaction, both mutants complement an E. coli OSBS auxotroph and have measurable levels of OSBS activity. The analogous mutations in the D297G mutant of AEE and the E323G mutant of MLE II are each located at the end of the eighth beta-strand of the (beta/alpha)(8)-barrel and alter the ability of AEE and MLE II to bind the substrate of the OSBS reaction. The substitutions relax the substrate specificity, thereby allowing catalysis of the mechanistically diverse OSBS reaction with the assistance of the active site lysines. The generation of functionally promiscuous and mechanistically diverse enzymes via single-amino acid substitutions likely mimics the natural divergent evolution of enzymatic activities and also highlights the utility of the (beta/alpha)(8)-barrel as a scaffold for new function.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Systematic variation of amino acid substitutions for stringent assessment of pairwise covariation.

During protein evolution, amino acids change due to a combination of functional constraints and genetic drift. Proteins frequently contain pairs of amino acids that appear to change together (covariation). Analysis of covariation from naturally occurring sets of orthologs cannot distinguish between residue pairs retained by functional requirements of the protein and those pairs existing due to changes along a common evolutionary path. Here, we have separated the two types of covariation by independently recombining every naturally occurring amino acid variant within a set of 15 subtilisin orthologs. Our analysis shows that in this family of subtilisin orthologs, almost all possible pairwise combinations of amino acids can coexist. This suggests that amino acid covariation found in the subtilisin orthologs is almost entirely due to common ancestral origin of the changes rather than functional constraints. We conclude that naturally occurring sequence diversity can be used to identify positions that can vary independently without destroying protein function.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Synthetic shuffling expands functional protein diversity by allowing amino acids to recombine independently.

We describe synthetic shuffling, an evolutionary protein engineering technology in which every amino acid from a set of parents is allowed to recombine independently of every other amino acid. With the use of degenerate oligonucleotides, synthetic shuffling provides a direct route from database sequence information to functional libraries. Physical starting genes are unnecessary, and additional design criteria such as optimal codon usage or known beneficial mutations can also be incorporated. We performed synthetic shuffling of 15 subtilisin genes and obtained active and highly chimeric enzymes with desirable combinations of properties that we did not obtain by other directed-evolution methods.

Amino Acid Sequence↗