PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jonatha M Gott

Publications and source records attributed to Jonatha M Gott.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Discovery of new genes and deletion editing in Physarum mitochondria enabled by a novel algorithm for finding edited mRNAs.

Gene finding is complicated in organisms that exhibit insertional RNA editing. Here, we demonstrate how our new algorithm Predictor of Insertional Editing (PIE) can be used to locate genes whose mRNAs are subjected to multiple frameshifting events, and extend the algorithm to include probabilistic predictions for sites of nucleotide insertion; this feature is particularly useful when designing primers for sequencing edited RNAs. Applying this algorithm, we successfully identified the nad2, nad4L, nad6 and atp8 genes within the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum, which had gone undetected by existing programs. Characterization of their mRNA products led to the unanticipated discovery of nucleotide deletion editing in Physarum. The deletion event, which results in the removal of three adjacent A residues, was confirmed by primer extension sequencing of total RNA. This finding is remarkable in that it comprises the first known instance of nucleotide deletion in this organelle, to be contrasted with nearly 500 sites of single and dinucleotide addition in characterized mitochondrial RNAs. Statistical analysis of this larger pool of editing sites indicates that there are significant biases in the 2 nt immediately upstream of editing sites, including a reduced incidence of nucleotide repeats, in addition to the previously identified purine-U bias.

Algorithms↗

Unexpectedly complex editing patterns at dinucleotide insertion sites in Physarum mitochondria.

Many of the RNAs transcribed from the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum are edited by the insertion of nonencoded nucleotides, which are added either singly or as dinucleotides. In addition, at least one mRNA is also subject to substitutional editing in which encoded C residues are changed to U residues posttranscriptionally. We have shown previously that the predominant type of editing in these organelles, the insertion of nonencoded single C residues, occurs cotranscriptionally at the growing end of the RNA chain. However, less is known about the timing of dinucleotide addition, and it has been suggested that these insertions occur at a later stage in RNA maturation. Here we examine the addition of both single nucleotides and dinucleotides into nascent RNAs synthesized in vitro and in vivo. The distribution of added nucleotides within individual cloned cDNAs supports the hypothesis that all insertion sites are processed at the same time relative to transcription. In addition, the patterns of partial editing and misediting observed within these nascent RNAs suggest that separate factors may be required at a subset of dinucleotide insertion sites and raise the possibility that in vivo, nucleotides may be added to RNA and then changed posttranscriptionally.

Animals↗

Editing site recognition and nucleotide insertion are separable processes in Physarum mitochondria.

Insertional RNA editing in Physarum polycephalum is a complex process involving the specific addition of non-templated nucleotides to nascent mitochondrial transcripts. Since all four ribonucleotides are substrates for the editing activity(s), both the site of insertion and the identity of the nucleotide to be added at a particular position must be specified, but the signals for these events have yet to be elucidated. Here we report the occurrence of sporadic errors in RNAs synthesized in vitro. These mistakes, which include omission of encoded nucleotides as well as misinsertions, occur only on templates that support editing. The pattern of these misediting events indicates that editing site recognition and nucleotide addition are separable events, and that the recognition step involves features of the mitochondrial template that are required for editing. The larger deletions lack all templated nucleotides between editing sites, suggesting that the transcription/editing apparatus can "jump" from one insertion site to another, perhaps mediated by interactions with editing determinants, while smaller omissions most likely reflect misalignment of the transcript upon resumption of templated RNA synthesis.

Animals↗

Cotranscriptional editing of Physarum mitochondrial RNA requires local features of the native template.

RNAs in the mitochondrion of Physarum polycephalum are edited by the precise cotranscriptional addition of non-encoded nucleotides. Here we describe experiments to address the basis of editing specificity using a series of chimeric templates generated by either rearranging the DNA present in editing-competent mitochondrial transcription elongation complexes (mtTECs) or linking it to exogenous DNA. Notably, run-on transcripts synthesized from rearranged mtTECs are edited at the natural sites, even when different genes are ligated together, yet exogenous, deproteinized DNA does not support editing. Furthermore, the accuracy of nucleotide insertion in chimeric RNAs argues that any cis-acting determinants of cytidine insertion are limited to small regions surrounding editing sites. Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that template-associated factors affect read-out of the mitochondrial genome.

Animals↗

Expanding genome capacity via RNA editing.

RNA editing, which results in the creation of RNA molecules that differ from the template from which they were made, is a highly specific process. Alterations include converting one base to another, removal of one nucleotide and substitution of another, deletion of encoded residues, and insertion of non-templated nucleotides. Such changes have marked effects on gene expression, ranging from defined amino acid changes to the de novo creation of entire open reading frames. Editing can be regulated in a developmental or tissue-specific manner, and is likely to play a role in the etiology of human disease.

Genetic Techniques↗