Biomedical subjects

Jonathan A Knibb

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathan A Knibb.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Clinical and pathological characterization of progressive aphasia.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical and neuropathological categorization of patients presenting with progressive aphasia is an area of controversy. This study aimed to characterize a large group of progressive aphasic patients from a single center (n = 38), first clinically by case note review, and then pathologically. METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis of the cases according to their clinical language deficits was used to establish an unbiased, data-driven classification. RESULTS: This analysis revealed two groups of cases corresponding to the syndromes of progressive nonfluent aphasia (n = 23) and semantic dementia (n = 15). Postmortem analysis showed a majority in both groups of pathologies from the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: the most frequent were non-Alzheimer's disease (AD) tauopathy in the nonfluent cases (10 of 23) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions in the fluent cases (8 of 15). Despite rigorous exclusion of cases with clinically significant memory deficits or other cognitive impairments, the pathology of AD was present in approximately one third of each group (overall 12 of 38), although often with an atypical neuroanatomical distribution. INTERPRETATION: Progressive aphasia is best seen as a composite of two conditions, on both clinical and pathological levels: progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia.

Alzheimer Disease↗

PubMed2006

Frontotemporal dementia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The syndromes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration are increasingly recognized as an important cause of early-onset dementia. Diagnostic consensus criteria have now been established for almost a decade, and form the framework for its clinical classification. While these criteria remain useful, a growing body of evidence suggests that revisions may be necessary to improve their validity and applicability. RECENT FINDINGS: In each individual syndrome, the core features are not uniformly present, and criteria that are currently used to exclude a condition, such as impaired episodic memory, are often present. Imaging, however, may warrant increased diagnostic prominence, particularly for diagnosis in semantic dementia and prognosis in behavioural syndromes. There is clinical and pathological overlap between the syndromes, but the clinical distinction between progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia is strengthening. Several series have refined our understanding of the correspondence between clinical syndromes and histopathological subtype: strong for tau-negative, ubiquitin-positive forms and more variable for tau-positive forms, yet prospective studies are still rare. The influence of genetic factors varies substantially across the syndromes. SUMMARY: Further research should aim to integrate detailed clinical, radiological, pathological and genetic information.

Aphasia, Primary Progressive↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Semantic dementia and primary progressive aphasia: a problem of categorization?

The relationship between semantic dementia (SD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) has been the subject of debate ever since the syndromes were first described, in converging streams of research from the neuropsychological and neurologic communities. The most salient clinical features of SD are anomia with circumlocution and semantic paraphasia, single-word comprehension deficit, and reduced category fluency. Of critical importance is the fact that patients also show deficits on non-verbal tasks using visual, auditory, and other modalities, suggesting that the key impairment in SD is a breakdown in conceptual knowledge rather than a specific problem with language. The finding of item consistency between the various tests supports this view. The order in which the features appear can be explained by the variable degree of redundancy in access to semantic knowledge from the different perceptual modalities. Atrophy is seen in the anterior and inferior temporal lobe rather than in classic language areas, further distancing SD from aphasic syndromes. Semantic dementia and progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA) share some clinical and pathologic characteristics with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia, but there are also clear differences between the three syndromes. We believe that many patients described as having fluent primary progressive aphasia in fact have early SD. Semantic dementia is a well-defined syndrome, distinct from PNFA but related to it within the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes.

Aphasia, Primary Progressive↗