Biomedical subjects

Jonathan T Carter

Publications and source records attributed to Jonathan T Carter.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Outcome of patients with hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus infections referred for liver transplantation.

The outcome of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) referred for liver transplantation (LT) is unknown. A high frequency of lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) HBV infection may increase the risk of liver-related death pre-transplantation and prophylaxis failure post-transplantation. We evaluated the association of LAM-R HBV on pre-transplant survival and post-transplant outcomes in 35 consecutive HIV-HBV coinfected patients referred for LT between July 2000 and September 2002. At the time of referral, the median CD4 count was 273/mm, MELD was 14, and LAM-R HBV infection was present in 67%. Among these referred patients, 26% were listed, 29% not listed due to relative/absolute contraindications; 26% not listed as too early for LT; 9% not listed as too sick for LT; and 11% died during transplant evaluation. Of the 9 listed patients, 4 remained listed, 1 died 18 months post-referral, and 4 were transplanted (11% of total) 3 to 40 months after listing. Of 17 evaluated but not listed patients, 5 died (p=0.38 compared to listed group) and all deaths were liver-related. All the HBV-HIV coinfected patients, who were transplanted, are HBsAg negative and have undetectable HBV DNA levels on prophylactic therapy using hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) plus lamivudine, with and without tenofovir or adefovir, with median 33.1 months follow-up. Late referral and the presence of LAM-R HBV pre-transplantation are common in referred HIV-HBV patients. In HIV-HBV coinfected patients undergoing LT, HBV recurrence is successfully prevented with combination prophylaxis using HBIG and antivirals.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery.

HYPOTHESIS: Concern exists as to the safety of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) compared with open donor nephrectomy. Reported complications of LDN include emergent conversion to an open procedure, repeated surgery for postoperative bleeding, and even death. We hypothesize that LDNs can be performed safely, with a complication rate comparable with that of open donor nephrectomies. DESIGN: Case series and review of the literature. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Five hundred thirty kidney donors. INTERVENTION: An LDN performed without hand assistance, with the kidney extracted through a low transverse incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean operative time, requirement for transfusion, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: This series includes 84 right-sided donor nephrectomies, 86 donors with a body mass index greater than 30 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), and 91 donors with complex vascular anatomy. Mean donor age was 40 years (range, 18-73 years), and mean +/- SD operative time was 196 +/- 43 minutes. The only conversion occurred early in the series, and there have been 525 subsequent cases without the need for conversion or repeated surgery. There were no donor deaths. Five donors (0.9%) required perioperative blood transfusions. Overall complication rate was 6.4%, including 14 minor wound infections, 2 bowel injuries, 1 case of prolonged ileus, 3 splenic injuries, 2 bladder infections, 1 bladder injury, 1 case of rhabdomyolysis, 1 case of pneumonia, and 2 thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates that LDN can be performed at least as safely as open donor nephrectomy, with minimal bleeding and few postoperative complications.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient.

This study investigates the effect of renal artery multiplicity on donor and recipient outcomes after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Three-hundred and sixty-one sequential procedures were performed over a 4-year period. Forty-nine involved accessory renal arteries; of these, 36 required revascularization and 13 were small polar vessels and ligated. The 312 remaining kidneys with single arteries served as controls. Study variables included operative times, blood loss, hospital stay, graft function and donor and recipient complications. Kidneys with multiple revascularized arteries had a longer mean warm ischemia time (35.3 vs. 29.2 min, p = 0.0003), and more ureteral complications (6/36 vs. 10/312, p = 0.0013) than single-artery controls. In contrast, ligation of a small superior accessory artery had no significant effect on donor operative time, blood loss, or complication rate while providing similar recipient graft function compared to single-artery controls. Renal artery number is important in selecting the appropriate kidney for laparoscopic procurement. Given the current excellent results with right-sided donor nephrectomy, kidneys with single arteries should be preferentially procured, irrespective of side.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Expanded criteria donor kidney allocation: marked decrease in cold ischemia and delayed graft function at a single center.

Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney allocation aims to increase utilization and facilitate placement. We implemented an ECD program for pre-consented candidates and studied whether ECD allocation decreased cold ischemia time and delayed graft function (DGF). We compared donor, recipient and transplant data for ECD transplants performed during the first year of our program to those performed in the preceding 5 1/2 years. Logistic regression identified risk factors for DGF. Of 356 candidates, 107 (30%) consented, 32 (9%) completed evaluation and 20 (6%) underwent ECD transplantation during the program's first year. The recent and historical ECD cohorts had similar donor and recipient characteristics, except that recent ECD recipients were older. The rate of donor kidney biopsy dropped from 85% to 24% (p < 0.001). Cold ischemia time decreased from 16.4 to 7.4 h (p < 0.001), as did the incidence of DGF from 43% to 15% (p = 0.031). Three independent risk factors for DGF emerged: recipient height (OR 1.21/10 cm; p = 0.008), >4 HLA mismatches (OR 20.46; p = 0.0033) and cold ischemia time (OR 1.24/h; p = 0.0036). We conclude the ECD designation provides a description of kidney quality that may obviate biopsy. ECD allocation decreased cold ischemia time and DGF, which may improve graft survival.

Aged↗