Biomedical subjects

Jorge H Medina

Publications and source records attributed to Jorge H Medina.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Persistence of long-term memory storage requires a late protein synthesis- and BDNF- dependent phase in the hippocampus.

Persistence is the most characteristic attribute of long-term memory (LTM). To understand LTM, we must understand how memory traces persist over time despite the short-lived nature and rapid turnover of their molecular substrates. It is widely accepted that LTM formation is dependent upon hippocampal de novo protein synthesis and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) signaling during or early after acquisition. Here we show that 12 hr after acquisition of a one-trial associative learning task, there is a novel protein synthesis and BDNF-dependent phase in the rat hippocampus that is critical for the persistence of LTM storage. Our findings indicate that a delayed stabilization phase is specifically required for maintenance, but not formation, of the memory trace. We propose that memory formation and memory persistence share some of the same molecular mechanisms and that recurrent rounds of consolidation-like events take place in the hippocampus for maintenance of the memory trace.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

mTOR signaling in the hippocampus is necessary for memory formation.

It is widely accepted that the formation of long-term memory (LTM) requires mRNA translation, but little is known about the cellular mechanisms in the brain that regulate this process. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key regulator of translational efficacy and capacity. Here, we show that LTM formation of one-trial inhibitory avoidance (IA) in rats, a hippocampus-dependent fear-motivated learning task, requires mTOR activation. IA training is specifically associated with a rapid increase in the phosphorylation state of mTOR and its substrate ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K). Bilateral intra-CA1 infusion of rapamycin, a selective mTOR inhibitor, 15 min before, but not immediately after training completely hinders IA LTM without affecting short-term memory (STM) retention. Therefore, our findings indicate that the regulation of hippocampal mRNA translation is a major control step in memory consolidation.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2006

Different molecular cascades in different sites of the brain control memory consolidation.

To understand cognition, it is important to understand how a learned response becomes a long-lasting memory. This process of memory consolidation has been modeled extensively using one-trial avoidance learning, in which animals (or humans) establish a conditioned response by learning to avoid danger in just one trial. This relies on molecular events in the CA1 region of the hippocampus that resemble those involved in CA1 long-term potentiation (LTP), and it also requires equivalent events to occur with different timings in the basolateral amygdala and the entorhinal, parietal and cingulate cortex. Many of these steps are modulated by monoaminergic pathways related to the perception of and reaction to emotion, which at least partly explains why strong and resistant consolidation is typical of emotion-laden memories. Thus memory consolidation involves a complex network of brain systems and serial and parallel molecular events, even for a task as deceptively simple as one-trial avoidance. We propose that these molecular events might also be involved in many other memory types in animals and humans.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Angiotensin II disrupts inhibitory avoidance memory retrieval.

The brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in learning and memory, but the actual role of angiotensin II (A(II)) and its metabolites in this process has been difficult to comprehend. This has been so mainly due to procedural issues, especially the use of multi-trial learning paradigms and the utilization of pre-training intracerebroventricular infusion of RAS-acting compounds. Here, we specifically analyzed the action of A(II) in aversive memory retrieval using a hippocampal-dependent, one-trial, step-down inhibitory avoidance task (IA) in combination with stereotaxically localized intrahippocampal infusion of drugs. Rats bilaterally implanted with infusion cannulae aimed to the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus were trained in IA and tested for memory retention 24 h later. We found that when given into CA1 15 min before IA memory retention test, A(II), but not angiotensin IV or angiotensin(1-7) induced a dose-dependent and reversible amnesia without altering locomotor activity, exploratory behavior or anxiety state. The effect of A(II) was blocked in a dose-dependent manner by the A(II)-type 2 receptor (AT(2)) antagonist PD123319 but not by the A(II)-type 1 receptor (AT(1)) antagonist losartan. By themselves, neither PD123319 nor losartan had any effect on memory expression. Our data indicate that intra-CA1 A(II) hinders retrieval of avoidance memory through a process that involves activation of AT(2) receptors.

Angiotensin II↗

PubMed2006

A link between the hippocampal and the striatal memory systems of the brain.

Two major memory systems have been recognized over the years (Squire 1987): the declarative memory system, which is under the control of the hippocampus and related temporal lobe structures, and the procedural or habit memory system, which is under the control of the striatum and its connections. Most if not all learning tasks studied in animals, however, involve either the performance or the suppression of movement; this, if learned well, may be viewed as having become a habit. It is agreed that memory rules change from their first association to those that take place when the task is mastered. Does this change of rules involve a switch from one memory system to another? Here we will comment on: 1) reversal learning in the Morris water maze (MWM), in which the declarative or spatial component of a task is changed but the procedural component (to swim to safety) persists and needs to be re-linked with a different set of spatial cues; and 2) a series of observations on an inhibitory avoidance task that indicate that the brain systems involved change with further learning.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Extinction and reacquisition of a fear-motivated memory require activity of the Src family of tyrosine kinases in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

Evidences indicate that extinction represents a NMDA receptor (NMDAr)-dependent learning rather than erasure of previously stored information. Several members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases are activated by stimulation of the NMDAr and are involved in both induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation and consolidation of hippocampal-dependent, NMDAr-sensitive, memories. Here we analyzed the role of the Src family within the CA1 region of the hippocampus in extinction and reacquisition of the memory for step-down, inhibitory avoidance learning task (IA). Rats trained in IA were submitted to 5 daily extinction sessions during which the avoidance response was elicited in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus. Immediately or 180 min after each extinction session animals received intra-CA1 infusions of either 0.1% DMSO, the Src-family inhibitor PP2 or its inactive analog, PP3. PP2 blocked extinction of the IA response which was otherwise evident in DMSO and PP3-treated animals. After being submitted to a new training session the animals reacquired the avoidance response; however, they failed to do so if they received intra-CA1 infusions of PP2 immediately following retraining. Our results indicate that, like the original learning, extinction and reacquisition of the IA response require activity of the Src family in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Retrieval and the extinction of memory.

1. Memory is assessed by measuring retrieval which is often elicited by the solely presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS). However, as known since Pavlov, presentation of the CS alone generates extinction. 2. One-trial avoidance (IA) is a much used conditioned fear paradigm in which the CS is the safe part of a training apparatus, the unconditioned stimulus (US) is a footshock and the conditioned response (CR) is to stay in the safe area. Retrieval of the memory for the step-down version of this task is measured in the absence of the US, as latency to step-down from the safe area (i.e., a platform). 3. Extinction of the IA response is installed at the moment of the first non-reinforced test session, as clearly shown by the fact that many drugs, including PKA, ERK and protein synthesis inhibitors as well as NMDA receptor antagonists, hinder extinction when infused into the hippocampus or the basolateral amygdala at the moment of the first test session but not later. 4. Some, but not all the molecular systems required for extinction are also activated by retrieval, further endorsing the hypothesis that although retrieval is necessary for the generation of extinction this last process constitutes a new learning secondary to the non-reinforced expression of the original trace.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Pretraining but not preexposure to the task apparatus prevents the memory impairment induced by blockade of protein synthesis, PKA or MAP kinase in rats.

Adult male Wistar rats were trained and tested in a step-down inhibitory avoidance task (0.4 mA footshock, 24 h training-test interval). Fifteen minutes before or 0, 1.5 or 3 hours after training, animals received a 0.8 microl intrahippocampal infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin (80 microg), the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMP (0.05 microg), the MAPK kinase inhibitor PD 098059 (50 microM solution) or vehicle (phosphate buffer in saline, pH 7.4). Anisomycin, Rp-cAMP and PD 098059 impaired retention test performance in animals injected at different times, prior and after training. Pretraining with a low footshock intensity (0.2 mA) 24 h before training prevented the amnestic effect of all drugs studied. However, simple preexposure to the inhibitory avoidance apparatus did not alter the amnestic effects of all drugs. The results suggest that memory processing requires hippocampal mechanisms dependent on protein synthesis, PKA and MAPK kinase at different times after training. These findings suggest that weak training must be sufficient to produce some lasting cellular expression of the experience so that the enhancement of consolidation of a previously acquired memory is not dependent on protein synthesis, PKA or MAPK.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Relationship between short- and long-term memory and short- and long-term extinction.

Both the acquisition and the extinction of memories leave short- and long-term mnemonic traces. Here, we show that in male Wistar rats, the short-term memory for a step-down inhibitory avoidance task (IA) is resistant to extinction, and that its expression does not influence retrieval or extinction of long-term memory. It has been known for some time that short- and long-term inhibitory avoidance memory involve separate and parallel processes. Here we show that, instead, short-term extinction of IA long-term memory is the first step towards its long-term extinction, and that this link requires functional NMDA receptors and protein synthesis in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus at the time of the first CS-no US presentation.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

One-trial aversive learning induces late changes in hippocampal CaMKIIalpha, Homer 1a, Syntaxin 1a and ERK2 protein levels.

Most studies regarding altered gene expression after learning are performed using multi-trial tasks, which do not allow a clear discrimination of memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval. We screened for candidate memory-modulated genes in the hippocampus at 3 and 24 h after one-trial inhibitory avoidance (IA) training, using a cDNA array containing 1176 genes. While 33 genes were modulated by training (respect to shocked-only animals), most of them were upregulated (27 genes) and only 6 were downregulated. To confirm and extend these findings, we performed RT-PCRs and analyzed differences in protein levels in rat hippocampus using immunoblot assays. We found several proteins upregulated 24 h after training: extracellular signal-regulated kinase ERK2, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (CaMKIIalpha), Syntaxin 1a, c-fos and Homer 1a. The total level of none of these proteins were found to be altered when measured 3-h post-training. Several of the mRNAs corresponding to the upregulated proteins were changed at 3 h but not 24 h. Additionally, a number of other candidates were identified for the first time as modulated by learning. The results presented here suggest that single-trial tasks can expose previously unseen differences in dynamic regulation of gene expression after behavioral manipulations, both at the transcriptional and translational levels, and reveal a diversity of gene products modulated by this task, allowing deeper understanding of the molecular basis of memory formation.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Angiotensin II blocks memory consolidation through an AT2 receptor-dependent mechanism.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Several studies suggest that the brain renin-angiotensin system is involved in memory consolidation. However, the participation of angiotensin II (AII) in this process is controversial. This is probably due to the fact that many of the studies carried out to elucidate this matter employed multitrial learning paradigms together with pretraining intracerebroventricular infusions, and therefore were unable to distinguish between consolidation and retrieval related events and lacked anatomical specificity. To circumvent this problem, we analyzed the role played in memory consolidation by AII using the hippocampal-dependent, one-trial, step-down inhibitory avoidance task (IA) in combination with stereotaxically localized intrahippocampal infusion of drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats bilaterally implanted with infusion cannulae into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus (CA1) were trained in IA and tested for memory retention 24 h later. We found that when infused into CA1 immediately or 30 min after training but not later, AII produced a dose-dependent amnesic effect without altering locomotor activity, exploratory behavior or anxiety state. The amnesic effect of AII was not mimicked by angiotensin IV (AIV) and was totally blocked by the AII-type 2 receptor (AT2) antagonist, PD123319, but not by the AII-type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist, losartan. Importantly, when infused alone, neither PD123319 nor losartan produced any effect on memory retention. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that, when given into CA1, AII blocks memory formation through a mechanism involving activation of AT2 receptors; however, endogenous AII does not seem to participate in the consolidation of IA long-term memory.

Amnesia↗

PubMed2004

Protein synthesis, PKA, and MAP kinase are differentially involved in short- and long-term memory in rats.

We studied the involvement of hippocampal protein synthesis-, PKA-, and MAP kinase-dependent processes in short- (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) for inhibitory avoidance task. Fifteen minutes before or immediately after training rats received intrahippocampal infusions of vehicle, the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin, the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMPs or the MAPKK inhibitor PD098059. The results show that STM recruits PKA and MAPK, whereas, LTM depends on PKA activity and protein synthesis during the early post-training period.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

The transition from memory retrieval to extinction.

Memory is measured by measuring retrieval. Retrieval is often triggered by the conditioned stimulus (CS); however, as known since Pavlov, presentation of the CS alone generates extinction. One-trial avoidance (IA) is a much used conditioned fear paradigm in which the CS is the safe part of a training apparatus, the unconditioned stimulus (US) is a footshock and the conditioned response is to stay in the safe area. In IA, retrieval is measured without the US, as latency to step-down from the safe area (i.e., a platform). Extinction is installed at the moment of the first unreinforced test session, as clearly shown by the fact that many drugs, including PKA, ERK and protein synthesis inhibitors as well as NMDA receptor antagonists, hinder extinction when infused into the hippocampus or the basolateral amygdala at the moment of the first test session but not later. Some, but not all the molecular systems required for extinction are also activated by retrieval, further endorsing the hypothesis that although retrieval is behaviorally and biochemically necessary for the generation of extinction, this last process constitutes a new learning secondary to the unreinforced expression of the original trace.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Learning modulation by endogenous hippocampal IL-1: blockade of endogenous IL-1 facilitates memory formation.

The interleukin-1 (IL-1) cytokine family (IL-1alpha, IL-beta, and the IL-1 receptor antagonist) is involved in immune and inflammatory responses both in the brain and in the periphery. Recently, it has also been shown to influence behavior and memory consolidation. However, within the experimental systems studied, it has remained unclear whether the role of IL-1beta is associated solely with a pathophysiological process or whether it is a neuromodulator in normal adult brain. To evaluate the involvement of the nonpathological endogenous IL-1 system in learning, we studied the expression of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-1ra during memory consolidation. We observed a learning-specific hippocampal IL-1alpha mRNA induction, but not that of IL-1beta or IL-1ra mRNAs, after inhibitory avoidance training. Moreover, when IL-1 receptor activity was inhibited using an adenoviral vector that expresses the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in the hippocampus, both short-term and long-term memory retention scores were facilitated. In contrast, endogenous hippocampal IL-1 played no role in the habituation to a novel environment. These results demonstrate that endogenous hippocampal IL-1 specifically modulates a fear-motivated learning task, and suggest that IL-1alpha activity in the CNS is part of the hippocampal memory processing.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Gene expression during memory formation.

For several decades, neuroscientists have provided many clues that point out the involvement of de novo gene expression during the formation of long-lasting forms of memory. However, information regarding the transcriptional response networks involved in memory formation has been scarce and fragmented. With the advent of genome-based technologies, combined with more classical approaches (i.e., pharmacology and biochemistry), it is now feasible to address those relevant questions--which gene products are modulated, and when that processes are necessary for the proper storage of memories--with unprecedented resolution and scale. Using one-trial inhibitory (passive) avoidance training of rats, one of the most studied tasks so far, we found two time windows of sensitivity to transcriptional and translational inhibitors infused into the hippocampus: around the time of training and 3-6 h after training. Remarkably, these periods perfectly overlap with the involvement of hippocampal cAMP/PKA (protein kinase A) signaling pathways in memory consolidation. Given the complexity of transcriptional responses in the brain, particularly those related to processing of behavioral information, it was clearly necessary to address this issue with a multi-variable, parallel-oriented approach. We used cDNA arrays to screen for candidate inhibitory avoidance learning-related genes and analyze the dynamic pattern of gene expression that emerges during memory consolidation. These include genes involved in intracellular kinase networks, synaptic function, DNA-binding and chromatin modification, transcriptional activation and repression, translation, membrane receptors, and oncogenes, among others. Our findings suggest that differential and orchestrated hippocampal gene expression is necessary in both early and late periods of long-term memory consolidation. Additionally, this kind of studies may lead to the identification and characterization of genes that are relevant for the pathogenesis of complex psychiatric disorders involving learning and memory impairments, and may allow the development of new methods for the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.

Amanitins↗

PubMed2004

Hippocampal glutamate receptors in fear memory consolidation.

It is thought that activity-dependent changes in synaptic efficacy driven by biochemical pathways responsive to the action of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate are critical components of the mechanisms responsible for memory formation. In particular, the early activation of the NMDA (rNMDA) and AMPA (rAMPA) subtypes of ionotropic glutamate receptors has been demonstrated to be a necessary event for the acquisition of several types of memory. In the rat, consolidation of the long-term memory for a one-trial, step-down inhibitory avoidance task is blocked by antagonists of the rNMDA and rAMPA infused into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus early after training and is associated with a rapid and reversible increase in the total number of [3H]AMPA binding sites. The learning-induced increase in [[3H]AMPA is accompanied by translocation of the GluR1 subunit of the rAMPA to the post-synaptic terminal together with its phosphorylation at Ser831. In addition, learning of the mentioned fear-motivated task induces the activation and rNMDA-dependent translocation of CaMKII to the post-synaptic density. Inhibition of this protein kinase as well as blockade of the rNMDA abolishes both the learning-induced translocation of GluR1 and its phosphorylation. Our data suggest that learning of an avoidance task enhances hippocampal rAMPA signaling through rNMDA and CaMKII-dependent mechanisms.

6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione↗

PubMed2004

Retrograde amnesia induced by drugs acting on different molecular systems.

The gamma aminobutyric acid-A (GABA-sub(A)) agonist, muscimol, the glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5), and the inhibitor of the extracellularly regulated kinases (ERKs), UO 126, cause retrograde amnesia when administered to the hippocampus. In the present study, the authors found that they all cause retrograde amnesia for 1-trial inhibitory avoidance, not only when infused into the dorsal CA1 region of the hippocampus, but also when infused into the basolateral amygdala or the entorhinal, parietal, and posterior cingulate cortices. The posttraining time course of the effect of each drug was, however, quite different across brain structures. Thus, in all of them, NMDA receptors and the ERK pathway are indispensable for memory consolidation, and GABA-sub(A) receptor activation inhibits memory consolidation: but in each case, their influence is interwoven differently.

Amnesia, Retrograde↗

PubMed2004

Mitochondrial extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) are modulated during brain development.

Intracellular activation and trafficking of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERK) play a significant role in cell cycle progression, contributing to developmental brain activities. Additionally, mitochondria participate in cell signalling through energy-linked functions, redox metabolism and activation of pro- or anti-apoptotic proteins. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the presence of ERK1/2 in mitochondria during rat brain development. Immunoblotting, immune electron microscopy and activity assays demonstrated that ERK1/2 are present in fully active brain mitochondria at the outer membrane/intermembrane space fraction. Besides, it was observed that ERK1/2 translocation to brain mitochondria follows a developmental pattern which is maximal between E19-P2 stages and afterwards declines at P3, just before maximal translocation to nucleus, and up to adulthood. Most of mitochondrial ERK1/2 were active; upstream phospho-MAPK/ERK kinases (MEK1/2) were also detected in the brain organelles. Mitochondrial phospho-ERK1/2 increased at 1 microm hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) concentration, but it decreased at higher 50-100 microm H(2)O(2), almost disappearing after the organelles were maximally stimulated to produce H(2)O(2) with antimycin. Our results suggest that developmental mitochondrial activation of ERK1/2 cascade contributes to its nuclear translocation effects, providing information about mitochondrial energetic and redox status to the proliferating/differentiating nuclear pathways.

Age Factors↗