PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

José David Carrillo

Publications and source records attributed to José David Carrillo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Determination of ethylphenols in wine by in situ derivatisation and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Contamination by Brettanomyces is a frequent problem in many wineries that has a dramatic effect on wine aroma and hence its quality. The yeast Brettanomyces/Dekkera is involved in the formation of three important volatile ethylphenols-4-ethylphenol, 4-ethylguaiacol and 4-ethylcatechol-that transmit an unpleasant aroma to wine that has often been described as 'medicinal', 'stable' or 'leather'. This study proposes an in situ derivatisation and headspace solid-phase microextraction- gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method to determine the three ethylphenols in red Brettanomyces-tainted wines. The most important variables involved in the derivatisation (acetic anhydride and base concentration) and the extraction (extraction temperature and salt addition) processes were optimised by experimental design. The optimal conditions using 4 mL of wine in 20-mL sealed vials were 35 muL of acetic anhydride per millilitre of wine, 1 mL of 5.5% potassium carbonate solution and 0.9 g of sodium chloride and the extraction was performed with a divinylbenzene-carboxen-poly(dimethylsiloxane) fibre at 70 degrees C for 70 min. Then, the performance characteristics were established using wine samples spiked with the ethylphenols. For all compounds, the detection limits were below the odour threshold reported in the literature and they were between 2 and 17 microg L(-1) for 4-ethylguaiacol and 4-ethylphenol, respectively. Intermediate precision (as relative standard deviation) was acceptable, with values ranging from 0.3 to 12.1%. Finally, the method was applied in the analysis of aged Brettanomyces-tainted wines.

Journal Article↗

Fibre selection based on an overall analytical feature comparison for the solid-phase microextraction of trihalomethanes from drinking water.

This paper describes the optimization of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) conditions for three different fibres (Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR-PDMS), divinylbenzene-Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (DVB-CAR-PDMS) and polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB)) used to determine trihalomethanes (THMs) in water by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography (HS-SPME-GC). The influence of temperature and salting-out effect was examined using a central composite design for each fibre. Extraction time was studied separately at the optimum values found for temperature and sodium chloride concentration (40 degrees C and 0.36g mL-1). The HS-SPME-GC-MS method for each fibre was characterised in terms of linearity, detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) limits and repeatability. The fibre PDMS-DVB was selected as it provided a broader linear range, better repeatability and lower detection and quantification limits than the others, particularly CAR-PDMS fibre. The accuracy of the proposed method using the PDMS-DVB fibre was checked by a recovery study in both ultrapure and tap water. A blank analysis study showed the absence of memory effects for this fibre. The reproducibility (expressed as a percentage of relative standard deviation) was 6-11% and the detection limits were between 0.078 and 0.52microgL-1 for bromoform and chloroform, respectively. Finally, the method was applied to determine THM concentration in two drinking water samples.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗

Determination of volatile oak compounds in aged wines by multiple headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (MHS-SPME-GC-MS).

Multiple headspace solid-phase microextraction (MHS-SPME) with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry is proposed for quantification of nine volatile oak compounds in aged wines. These compounds are formed and extracted by wine when it is matured in oak barrels and are responsible for particular organoleptic properties and the high quality of these wines. Some important variables of the extraction process, for example volume of sample and extraction time, were studied. Extraction of 50 microL wine was performed with a divinylbenzene-Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane fibre at 55 degrees C for 60 min. For calibration the same conditions were used, except that the wine was substituted by 50 microL of a standard solution in synthetic wine. The linearity, detection limits, and repeatability of the method were determined by use of standard solutions in synthetic wine. Detection limits were between 0.01 and 10 microg L(-1) (for eugenol and furfural, respectively) and repeatability, expressed as relative standard deviation, was from 2 to 6%. The method was used to analyse six red wines and the concentrations obtained were statistically compared with those obtained by the standard addition method for the same wines.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗

Determination of volatile oak compounds in wine by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography (GC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) method was developed to identify and quantify 14 volatile oak compounds in aged red wines. The most important HS-SPME variables were optimised by experimental design technique in order to improved the extraction process. The selected conditions were: 10 mL of sample in 20 mL sealed vials with addition of 30% of sodium chloride (saturated solution), divinylbenzene-carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (DVB-CAR-PDMS) fibre, 10 min of pre-incubation time, 70 degrees C of temperature and 60 min of extraction time without agitation. The features of the method were established for the studied compounds in terms of linear range, slope and intercept of the calibration graphs, detection and quantification limits and repeatability. For all compounds detection limits were below their threshold levels and repeatability, in terms of relative standard deviation, was good, with values between 3 and 11%. Finally, the method was applied to the analysis of six aged red wines by both internal standard and standard addition calibration methods. The concentrations obtained with both methods were statistically compared.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗