Cholesterol crystal embolization.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Biomedical subjects
José M Morales
Publications and source records attributed to José M Morales.
Sirolimus therapy after early cyclosporine withdrawal reduces the risk for cancer in adult renal transplantation.
Sirolimus (SRL) is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor that, in contrast to cyclosporine (CsA), has been shown to inhibit rather than promote cancers in experimental models. At 3 mo +/- 2 wk after renal transplantation, 430 of 525 enrolled patients were randomly assigned to remain on SRL-CsA-steroids (ST) or to have CsA withdrawn and SRL troughs increased two-fold (SRL-ST). Median times to first skin and nonskin malignancies were compared between treatments using a survival analysis. Mean annualized rates of skin malignancy were calculated, and the relative risk was determined using a Poisson model. Malignancy-free survival rates for nonskin malignancies were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test. At 5 yr, the median time to a first skin carcinoma was delayed (491 versus 1126 d; log-rank test, P = 0.007), and the risk for an event was significantly lower with SRL-ST therapy (relative risk SRL-ST to SRL-CsA-ST 0.346; 95% confidence interval 0.227 to 0.526; P < 0.001, intention-to-treat analysis). The relative risks for both basal and squamous cell carcinomas were significantly reduced. Kaplan-Meier estimates of nonskin cancer were 9.6 versus 4.0% (SRL-CsA-ST versus SRL-ST; P = 0.032, intention-to-treat analysis). Nonskin cancers included those of the lung, larynx, oropharynx, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, prostate, breast, thyroid, and cervix as well as glioma, liposarcoma, astrocytoma, leukemia, lymphoma, and Kaposi's sarcoma. Patients who received SRL-based, calcineurin inhibitor-free therapy after CsA withdrawal at month 3 had a reduced incidence of both skin and nonskin malignancies at 5 yr after renal transplantation compared with those who received SRL therapy combined with CsA. Longer follow-up and additional trials are needed to confirm these promising results.
Adult↗
Cardiovascular risk profile with the new immunosuppressive combinations after renal transplantation.
Cardiovascular disease remains the main cause of death among kidney transplant patients. Cardiovascular risk burden already present at the moment of transplantation is substantially worsened by chronic use of immunosuppressants. On the other hand, chronic allograft nephropathy, a clinical-pathological result of immunological and non-immunological damage of the graft, is the main cause of graft loss in the long-term. Among the non-immunological factors contributing to the development of chronic allograft nephropathy, cardiovascular risk factors also seem to play a role. In the present review, we analyse the impact of the different immunosuppressive medications on cardiovascular risk factors after renal transplantation, including renal function.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
Cardiovascular risk profile in patients treated with sirolimus after renal transplantation.
Renal transplant patients are inherently predisposed to cardiovascular disease (CVD) as a result of prolonged exposure to multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Approximately one half of all late graft losses are due to death with a functioning graft, and CVD is the most frequent cause of death with a functioning graft among these patients. Immunosuppressive therapies associated with a reduced burden of risk for CVD would therefore greatly decrease post-transplantation morbidity and mortality. The nephrotoxic effects observed with the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), such as cyclosporine (CsA), run counter to the goal of renal transplant therapy. Sirolimus, a more recent immunosuppressive agent with a unique mechanism of action, offers an alternative to CsA. Recent data from a 4-year study investigating early CsA withdrawal from a sirolimus-CsA-steroid (SRL-CsA-ST) combination demonstrated significantly better renal function, lower blood pressure, and improved graft survival after CsA withdrawal. During that trial, the increase in serum lipids induced by sirolimus was generally manageable with lipid-lowering therapy. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate the value of CNI-free therapy compared with CNI-based regimens in reducing cardiovascular risk factors and improving patient and graft survival.
Cardiovascular Diseases↗
Sirolimus does not exhibit nephrotoxicity compared to cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.
Sirolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) prevent acute rejection in man when used as primary therapies in triple drug regimens. Sirolimus does not act via the calcineurin pathway and therefore is not expected to produce the same renal side-effects. This paper presents the pooled 2-year data analysis of renal function parameters from two open-label, randomized, multicenter studies. Patients (18-68 years) receiving a primary renal allograft were randomized to receive concentration-controlled sirolimus (n = 81) or CsA (n = 80), in combination with azathioprine and steroids (n = 83), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (n = 78). From week 10 through year 2, calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was significantly higher in sirolimus--than in CsA-treated patients (69.3 vs. 56.8 mL/min, at 2 years, p = 0.004). Serum uric acid was significantly higher in the CsA-treated patients and magnesium was significantly lower; these parameters were more likely to be within normal limits in the sirolimus group. Mean serum potassium and phosphorus were lower in sirolimus-treated patients. In conclusion, sirolimus, when administered as primary therapy in combination with azathioprine or MMF, has a favorable safety profile compared to CsA with regards to renal function.
Adult↗
Influence of the new immunosuppressive combinations on arterial hypertension after renal transplantation.
Arterial hypertension is highly prevalent after renal transplantation and may contribute to the risk of cardiovascular disease. Also, arterial hypertension has been reported to be an independent risk factor for graft failure. Immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, cyclosporine and tacrolimus may be important contributing factors to post-transplant hypertension. Recent data from multicenter trials and from conversion studies (cyclosporine to tacrolimus) suggest that renal transplant patients under tacrolimus-based therapy showed less arterial hypertension compared with cyclosporine treated patients. New immunosuppressive drugs, including mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin, are not nephrotoxic and they do not have any hypertensive effect. New immunosuppressive combinations including mycophenolate mofetil in a triple therapy regimen (associated with corticosteroids and cyclosporine) can reduce blood pressure so that corticosteroids can be stopped or cyclosporine reduced or even eliminated. Non-nephrotoxic regimens using rapamycin (sirolimus) as basic immunosuppression, associated with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, could reduce the incidence of post-transplant arterial hypertension. Also, in renal transplant patients initially immunosuppressed with rapamycin, cyclosporine and corticosteroids, after the elimination of CSA, a lower blood pressure is achieved. In summary, new protocols with mycophenolate mofetil and/or rapamycin may permit several combinations that offer important alternatives to classical immunosuppressive regimens to reduce the incidence and clinical impact of arterial hypertension after renal transplantation.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
Hepatitis C virus-positive patients on the waiting list for transplantation.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common problem in renal transplant patients, associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. HCV infection is associated with a lower graft and patient survival. The problem of HCV infection is the increase in viral load and liver transaminases after renal transplantation secondary to immunosuppressive therapy. After renal transplantation, interferon therapy is not recommended because of the risk for acute rejection and acute nephritis. In this context, it is absolutely necessary to consider the evaluation and treatment of HCV infection during the dialysis period. Several studies have defined the benefits of interferon therapy in dialysis patients, with rates of maintenance response significantly higher than in the general population. The difference in the pharmacokinetic profile of interferon in dialysis patients could justify its higher efficacy.
Antiviral Agents↗
Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney transplantation.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important problem in the patient with end-stage renal disease. After transplantation, liver disease is more frequent in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative patients. In the long run, this leads to important liver complications. The patients have a higher risk for developing proteinuria and infections. Long-term patient and graft survival rates are lower in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative graft recipients. Mortality is higher, mainly as a result of liver disease and infections. Despite this, transplantation is the best option for the HCV-positive patient with end-stage renal disease. Transplantation of HCV-positive kidneys should be offered to HCV-positive recipients in whom HCV RNA is detected in the serum. Finally, several measures after transplantation minimize the consequences of HCV infection. Adjustment of immunosuppression and careful follow-up in the outpatient clinic for early detection of proteinuria, infection, or worsening of liver disease are mandatory.
Graft Rejection↗
Transplantation in the patient with hepatitis C.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antiviral Agents↗