Biomedical subjects

Joseph Aderinto

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph Aderinto.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Posterior shoulder dislocations and fracture-dislocations.

Posterior shoulder dislocations and fracture-dislocations are uncommon injuries that most often occur during seizures or as a result of high-energy trauma. Despite advances in imaging, they are frequently diagnosed late. Detection is facilitated by heightened clinical suspicion of the injury in high-risk individuals together with appropriate radiographic investigation. A wide variety of operative techniques, ranging from simple closed reduction to soft-tissue and bone stabilization procedures to prosthetic arthroplasty, are available to treat these injuries. Selection of the most appropriate treatment option is complex and multifactorial. Because of the rarity of these injuries, evidence-based treatment protocols are difficult to devise. Good functional outcomes are associated with early detection and treatment of isolated posterior dislocations that are associated with a small osseous defect and are stable following closed reduction. Poor prognostic factors include late diagnosis, a large anterior defect in the humeral head, deformity or arthrosis of the humeral head, an associated fracture of the proximal part of the humerus, and the need for an arthroplasty.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Recurrent posterior shoulder instability.

Recurrent posterior shoulder instability is an uncommon, debilitating condition in young adults that is being diagnosed with increasing frequency. Although a number of predisposing factors have been identified, their relative importance remains poorly understood. Poor results have been reported following operative intervention to treat recurrent posterior instability with nonanatomic techniques. The more recent development of lesion-specific surgery has improved clinical results, particularly when that surgery has been performed arthroscopically. Operative treatment is therefore being increasingly recommended at an earlier stage to patients who do not respond to supervised rehabilitation programs.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Spinal cord monitoring using intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials for spinal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring is commonplace in scoliosis surgery as an adjunct to evaluate functional integrity of the cord; however, limited information is available on its applicability in spinal trauma. METHODS: We investigated the efficacy of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recording during reconstructive procedures in 82 patients who sustained 20 cervical, 8 thoracic, 6 thoracolumbar, and 48 lumbar vertebral fractures or fractures-dislo-cations. Seventy-one patients underwent single anterior or posterior operations and 11 combined anterior-posterior procedures. Forty patients had incomplete injuries, and 42 had no preoperative neurologic deficit. SEP trace amplitude at insertion of electrode was considered as the baseline value and was compared with the lowest intraoperative signal amplitude and the amplitude at completion of operation. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients had a depression in wave amplitude of >25% during surgery; in 25 patients, the trace fell by >50%, and in 7 cases, a >75% diminution was recorded. A loss of 50% in SEP signal amplitude showed 67% sensitivity and 71% specificity in predicting neurologic outcome. Increasing trace deterioration threshold from 50% to 60% improved specificity to 81% without compromising sensitivity. A loss of >50% in SEP amplitude occurred with significantly increased incidence during the anterior compared with the posterior spinal procedures. More than 20% recovery in signal amplitude at the conclusion of the procedure in patients with incomplete injuries was correlated with favorable neurologic function. CONCLUSION: Persistent intraoperative decrement in SEP amplitude and poor restitution at completion of surgery increase the risk for postoperative neurologic compromise.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Lateral release for patellofemoral arthritis.

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of treatment of patients with symptomatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis by closed lateral patellar retinacular release. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent 53 lateral retinacular release procedures between 1995 and 1999 for the treatment of symptomatic patellofemoral arthritis were assessed by questionnaire comprising the Oxford knee score, a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-10) for pain, and questions relating to level of patient satisfaction. Patients were included in this study whether or not tibiofemoral arthritis was present, but lateral release was performed only in those for whom the anterior knee pain of patellofemoral arthritis appeared to predominate. RESULTS: The average patient age was 53 years (range, 27 to 79 years). There were 14 men (28%) and 36 women (72%). Follow-up was a mean of 31 months (range, 12 to 65 months). Four patients underwent total knee replacement at 7, 14, 16, and 18 months after lateral release for recurrence of symptoms. In the remaining 49 knees, mean pain VAS was 3.8 +/- 2.8. In 39 knees (80%), patients judged that they had experienced a reduction in pain compared with their preoperative state (2 were pain free), 8 (16%) were unchanged, and 2 (4%) were worse. The average Oxford knee score was 27 (range, 12-48). At follow-up, 33% of patients were very satisfied, 26% satisfied, and 41% dissatisfied with their knee. The presence of tibiofemoral disease did not affect any of the outcome measures. Two patients developed superficial infections of the arthroscopic port sites. There were no cases of hemarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic lateral release is effective in reducing the pain of symptomatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis and gives reasonable rates of patient satisfaction irrespective of the presence of tibiofemoral arthritis.

Adult↗