PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joseph B Cofer

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph B Cofer.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

How surgical faculty and residents assess the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions: results of a multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined how surgical residents and faculty assessed the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions. METHODS: Questionnaires were administered in 9 general-surgery programs during the summer of 2004; response rates were 63% for faculty and 58% for residents (N = 259). Questions probed patient care, the residency program, quality of life, and overall assessments of the duty-hour restrictions. Results include the means, mean deviations, percentage who agree or strongly agree with the hour restrictions, and significance tests. RESULTS: Although most support the restrictions, few maintain that they improved surgical training or patient care. Faculty and residents differed (P < or = .05) on 16 of 21 items. Every difference shows that residents view the restrictions more favorably than faculty. The sex of the resident shaped the magnitude of the gap for 11 of 21 items. CONCLUSIONS: Few believe that duty-hour restrictions improve patient care or resident training. Residents, especially female residents, view the restrictions more favorably than faculty.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

Duty-hour restrictions and the work of surgical faculty: results of a multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE: To examine whether duty-hour restrictions have been consequential for various aspects of the work of surgical faculty and if those consequences differ for faculty in academic and nonacademic general surgery residency programs. METHOD: Questionnaires were distributed in 2004 to 233 faculty members in five academic and four nonacademic U.S. residency programs in general surgery. Participation was restricted to those who had been faculty for at least one year. Ten items on the questionnaire probed faculty work experiences. Results include means, percentages, and t-tests on mean differences. Of the 146 faculty members (63%) who completed the questionnaire, 101 volunteered to be interviewed. Of these, 28 were randomly chosen for follow-up interviews that probed experiences and rationales underlying items on the questionnaire. Interview transcripts (187 single-spaced pages) were analyzed for main themes. RESULTS: Questionnaire respondents and interviewees associated duty-hour restrictions with lowered faculty expectations and standards for residents, little change in the supervision of residents, a loss of time for teaching, increased work and stress, and less satisfaction. No significant differences in these perceptions (p < or = .05) were found for faculty in academic and nonacademic programs. Main themes from the interviews included a shift of routine work from residents to faculty, a transfer of responsibility to faculty, more frequent skill gaps at night, a loss of time for research, and the challenges of controlling residents' hours. CONCLUSIONS: Duty-hour restrictions have been consequential for the work of surgical faculty. Faculty should not be overlooked in future studies of duty-hour restrictions.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2004

Resident work hours: can we meet the ACGME requirements?

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires all programs to limit resident work hours to 80 hours per week with some programs allotted an extra 10 per cent for specific educational purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate data reflecting changes in resident schedules made in 2002-2003 to be compliant with ACGME requirements without compromising patient care or resident education. Surgery residents originally completed a work-hour survey in May 2002. The survey contained 14 daily time sheets. Residents were asked to document how their time was spent between 14 different categories delineating in-house and out-of-house hours. Changes were made to resident schedules in order to become compliant with the new regulations. After making changes in the schedule, two more surveys were completed and evaluated, once in May 2003 and again in November 2003. Final analyses compared results from May 2002 to November 2003. Surveys were distributed to 30 residents in May 2002. Twenty-two residents completed the survey with 16 surveys eligible for analysis following exclusion of abnormal rotations (i.e., research and vacation). Eighty-eight per cent of junior residents (PGY 1, 2, and 3), 50 per cent of senior residents (PGY 4-5), and 33 per cent of chief residents (PGY 6) worked more than 88 hours per week. In November 2003, surveys were sent to 32 residents. Twenty-four residents who were on our normal call schedule completed the survey. Fourteen per cent of junior residents, 33 per cent of senior residents, and 0 per cent of chief residents worked more than 88 hours per week. By making the changes described, we have substantially reduced the number of resident work-hours while maintaining our academic and patient care missions.

Accreditation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Is there declining interest in general surgery training?

PURPOSE: To monitor and report the quality of categorical first-year surgery residents matched to U.S. general surgery training programs from 1996 to 2001. METHODS: A survey was sent to 258 program directors of accredited general surgery training programs. In this survey, data were requested regarding United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 and 2 scores, matched residents' rank list position, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) status, number of applications received, and interviews granted pertaining to all National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) residents matched. In addition, the USMLE and NRMP were petitioned for national data regarding Step 1 and 2 scores in all entering surgery residents and first-time USMLE takers. RESULTS: Usable survey data were received on 1241 residents. The number for each year (and percent of total matched PGY-1 residents) was as follows: 1996-196 (20.0), 1997-206 (20.4), 1998-204 (19.9), 1999-212 (21.0), 2000-212 (20.7), and 2001-211 (21.7). The mean Step 1 scores increased over time (p < 0.001), and programs with 5 or more categorical spots had higher scores than those with 4 or less (p < 0.001). The depth required to fill the rank list increased over the study period (p < 0.05). National data received from the NRMP from 1994 to 2001 (mean of 916 residents at each year) showed a similar increase in USMLE Step 1 scores when compared with our survey. The proportion of AOA students matching into general surgery has decreased from 30% in 1996 to 15% in 2001 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over the 6 years of our study, USMLE Step 1 scores increased and the results of our survey are in agreement with the national data. However, the proportion of AOA students declined, implying the top 10% of the medical school class found general surgery training less attractive. Also, programs went deeper into their rank lists to fill, implying a shrinking pool of candidates.

Analysis of Variance↗