PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joseph B Lessing

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph B Lessing.

57 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Canavan disease.

OBJECTIVE: Canavan disease is an autosomal recessive disorder which is relatively common in Ashkenazi Jews. It is characterized by developmental delay, severe hypotonia and early death, and is caused by a deficiency of aspartoacylase which is encoded by the ASPA gene. In Ashkenazi Jews, one major mutation (E285A) and one minor mutation (Y231X) account for the majority of cases. The objective of this study was to develop a preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) protocol for Canavan disease. METHODS: Two carrier couples requested PGD for Canavan disease. In 1 couple each was a carrier of a different ASPA mutation (Y231X and E285A). In the other couple both were carriers of the minor mutation (Y231X). A single-cell duplex nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol was first developed on single leukocytes obtained from the known carrier parents. Following verification in single leukocytes, clinical PGD was offered to both couples. RESULTS: We evaluated 115 single leukocytes from known carriers and found an allele drop out rate of 1.7% for the fragment harboring the Y231X mutation and 0% for the fragment harboring the E285A mutation. One cycle of PGD was performed in each family. In the first, 11 embryos were successfully analyzed and 4 were found to be affected. Two unaffected embryos were transferred, but no pregnancy resulted. In the other family, 4 embryos were analyzed, 1 was affected, 2 were heterozygotes and 1 was homozygous normal. Following transfer of 2 unaffected embryos, a singleton pregnancy resulted, currently ongoing at 18 weeks gestational age. Amniocentesis performed at 16 weeks confirmed the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Reliable PGD for Canavan disease is possible using a single-cell nested PCR approach.

Canavan Disease↗

Severe hypospermatogenesis in cases of nonobstructive azoospermia: should we use fresh or frozen testicular spermatozoa?

The aim of this comparative clinical study was to examine whether the fertilizing potential of frozen-thawed testicular sperm in the most severe cases of hypospermatogenesis is reduced compared with fresh testicular sperm. The results could determine the necessity of using fresh testicular sperm cells, which mandates involving the spouse by performing simultaneous in vitro fertilization intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment in this subgroup of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. We studied 13 couples in which the husband was diagnosed as having NOA and few motile testicular sperm cells or only immotile testicular sperm cells were isolated by testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Each couple underwent both an ICSI cycle, in which fresh testicular sperm that were retrieved shortly beforehand were injected, and a consecutive cycle, which used frozen-thawed sperm that were retrieved in the original TESE procedure but were cryopreserved and stored until use. We found that motility was lost during the freezing and thawing process in some cases, which resulted in significantly more cycles with only immotile sperm cells for injection in the frozen-thawed sperm group (38.5%) than in the fresh sperm group (7.7%; P < .05). Availability of only immotile sperm cells significantly reduced fertilization rates in both fresh and frozen-thawed groups, but the respective overall fertilization rate (44.9% vs 41.1%) and quality of embryos and pregnancy rate (18.2% vs 15.4%) were not significantly different between groups. Implantation rates were more favorable in the fresh sperm group (10.5% vs 5.9%), but not significantly so. We conclude that, although cryopreservation does impair motility, which results in significantly more cycles with only immotile sperm cells for ICSI in the most severe forms of hypospermatogenesis, fertilization and pregnancy rates are not significantly compromised.

Adult↗

Comparison of efficacy of two techniques for testicular sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia: multifocal testicular sperm extraction versus multifocal testicular sperm aspiration.

To compare the efficacy of 2 sperm-retrieval procedures, testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), during the same procedure using the same subjects as their own controls. The presence of mature testicular sperm cells and motility were evaluated in 87 men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) by means of multifocal TESE and multifocal TESA, which were performed during the same procedure using the same subjects as their own controls. Sperm cells were recovered by TESE in 54 cases, but by TESA in only 36 cases. There were significantly more cases (n = 20) in which sperm cells were recovered by TESE only, compared with 2 cases in whom cells were recovered by TESA only (McNemar's test, P < .001). The mean number of locations in each testis in which sperm cells were detected was significantly higher in the TESE group. In significantly more cases (n = 27), motility was observed in TESE material only, compared with 3 cases in which motility was present in material extracted by TESA only (McNemar's test, P < .001). Mean number of locations in each testis with motile sperm cells was significantly higher in the TESE group. The TESE procedure yielded significantly more sperm cells, as was also reflected by the difference in number of straws with cryopreserved sperm. This comparative prospective clinical study revealed that multifocal TESE is more efficient than multifocal TESA for sperm detection and recovery in men with NOA and should be the procedure of choice for sperm retrieval for them.

Adult↗