PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joseph Brimacombe

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph Brimacombe.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique.

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that digital insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (ProSeal LMA) is more successful when using a suction catheter (SC) as a guide. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-three patients (ASA physical status I-III; aged 18-84 yr) were randomly allocated for the digital or SC-guided technique. The digital technique was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The SC technique involved priming the drain tube with the SC so that it protruded by 15 cm, blindly inserting the SC into the pharynx to a depth of 15 cm, followed by the digital technique. Failed insertion was defined by any of the following criteria: 1) failed passage into the pharynx; 2) malposition; and 3) ineffective ventilation. Any airway trauma, and visible or occult blood was noted. Sore throat, dysphonia and dysphagia were assessed 16 to 24 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: Fewer insertion attempts were required with the SC-guided technique (P = 0.02), but first attempt and overall success were similar. The time taken to provide an effective airway was shorter for the SC-guided technique (36 +/- 24 sec vs 44 +/- 28 sec, P = 0.02). A lateral approach was required less frequently with the SC-guided technique (0% vs 4%, P = 0.0004). There were no adverse events. Mouth trauma was more frequent with the digital technique (P = 0.04), but overall trauma was similar. There were no differences in the frequency of visible or occult blood. There were no differences in postoperative airway morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The SC-guided technique is more frequently successful than the digital technique and is associated with less mouth trauma during insertion of the ProSeal LMA. We suggest that the SC technique may be a useful alternative when the digital technique fails.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of three disposable extraglottic airway devices in spontaneously breathing adults: the LMA-Unique, the Soft Seal laryngeal mask, and the Cobra perilaryngeal airway.

BACKGROUND: The authors compared three disposable extraglottic airway devices in spontaneously breathing anesthetized adults: the LMA-Unique (LMA-U; The Laryngeal Mask Company, San Diego, CA), the Soft Seal laryngeal mask (SS-LM; Portex Ltd., Hythe, United Kingdom), and the Cobra perilaryngeal airway (Cobra-PLA; Engineered Medical Systems, Inc. Indianapolis, IN). METHODS: Three hundred twenty consecutive adults (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III; aged 18-80 yr) were randomly allocated for airway management with one of the three devices. Anesthesia was with fentanyl-propofol for induction and a sevoflurane-nitrous oxide-oxygen-fentanyl mixture for maintenance. Intraoperative data were collected by an unblinded observer about ease of insertion, effective airway time, oropharyngeal leak pressure, anatomical position (determined with a rigid endoscope), intracuff pressure changes, and airway trauma. Data were collected by a blinded observer about sore throat, dysphagia, and dysphonia 2 h after surgery. RESULTS: Insertion was easier with the LMA-U and SS-LM than with the Cobra-PLA (P < 0.02), but the overall failure rates were similar. Effective airway times were similar among groups. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was lower with the LMA-U than with the SS-LM and Cobra-PLA (P < 0.001). Intracuff pressure increased during surgery with all extraglottic airway devices. Anatomical position was better with the Cobra-PLA than with the SS-LMA (P < 0.001) and better with the SS-LM than with LMA-U (P < 0.001). Blood staining was detected more frequently with the Cobra-PLA than with the LMA-U and SS-LM (P < 0.001), but there were no differences in airway morbidity. CONCLUSION: The LMA-U and SS-LM are easier to insert and cause less trauma than the Cobra-PLA, but the Cobra-PLA has a more effective seal than the LMA-U and better endoscopically determined anatomical position than the LMA-U and SS-LM.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Anesthesia for pediatric gastroscopy: a study comparing the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with nasal cannulae.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that pediatric gastroscopy is more successful using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the drain tube as a conduit to the stomach (ProSeal LMA group) than using nasal cannulae with conventional oral access to the stomach (NC group). METHODS: Sixty children were consecutively and randomly allocated into each group. Patients breathed spontaneously and were given sevoflurane/air/oxygen mixture with propofol 1 mg.kg-1 boluses, as required. Anesthesia was provided by experienced users of both techniques. The following data were collected by an unblinded observer: operation and anesthesia times; cardiorespiratory data; adverse events; and recovery scores. In addition, the surgeon scored the ease of performing the procedure. RESULTS: The mean (range) age and weight was 74 (24-144) months and 26 (10-61) kg. Operation (15 min vs 24 min, P<0.0001) and anesthesia (22 min vs 37 min, P<0.0001) times were shorter in the ProSeal LMA group, but propofol bolus requirements per unit time were similar. Oxygen saturation was higher in the ProSeal LMA group (100% vs 94%, P<0.0006), but other cardiorespiratory variables were similar. There were no differences in the ease of performing the procedure. Hypoxia occurred more frequently in the NC group (20% vs 0%). Recovery scores were similar. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that pediatric gastroscopy is quicker and has fewer airway complications when performed through the ProSeal LMA than using nasal cannulae and a conventional approach by experienced users.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2006

Middle ear pressure changes during anesthesia with or without nitrous oxide are similar among airway devices.

We tested the hypothesis that middle ear pressure (MEP) is influenced by the choice of airway device during anesthesia with or without nitrous oxide (N2O) in the gas mixture. Eighty consecutive anesthetized, paralyzed ventilated patients (ASA physical status I-II, 18-65 yr) were randomly allocated for airway management with the orally inserted tracheal tube, classic laryngeal mask airway, ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, or laryngeal tube suction with or without N2O 66% in the gas mixture. MEP was measured from both ears in random order by a blinded observer before induction of anesthesia and every 10 min for 70 min. In the N2O groups, N2O was changed to air after 40 min. There were no differences in MEP among the airway devices in the N2O or air groups. MEP was unchanged in the air groups but increased in the N2O groups with N2O (P < 0.0001) and decreased with air (P < 0.02). Baseline values for MEP were similar, but MEP was always higher for the N2O groups (P < 0.001). We conclude that the choice of airway device does not influence MEP among orally inserted tracheal tube, classic laryngeal mask airway, ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, and laryngeal tube suction during anesthesia with or without N2O in the gas mixture.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training.

In the following pilot study, we compared conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation (tracheal intubation) and laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion (guided ProSeal) for airway management by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Five first-month residents with no practical experience of airway management were observed performing these techniques in 200 ASA I-II anesthetized, paralyzed adults. Each resident managed 40 patients, 20 in each group, in random order. The number of insertion attempts, effective airway time, ventilatory capability during pressure-controlled ventilation set at 15 cm H2O, airway trauma, and skill acquisition were studied. Data were collected by unblinded observers. Insertion was more frequently successful (100% versus 65%) and effective airway time was shorter (41 +/- 24 s versus 89 +/- 62 s) in the guided ProSeal group (both P < 0.0001). Expired tidal volume was larger (730 +/- 170 mL versus 560 +/- 140 mL) and end-tidal CO(2) lower (33 +/- 4 mm Hg versus 37 +/- 5 mm Hg) in the guided ProSeal group during pressure controlled ventilation (both P < 0.0001). Blood staining was more frequent on the laryngoscope (24% versus 2%; P < 0.0001) in the tracheal intubation group. There was evidence for skill acquisition in both groups. We conclude that laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for airway management in terms of insertion success, expired tidal volume, and airway trauma by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. The guided ProSeal technique has potential for cardiopulmonary resuscitation by novices when conventional intubation fails.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The ProSeal has a shorter life-span than the Classic laryngeal mask airway.

We tested the hypothesis that the life-span of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is shorter than the Classic LMA. We also compared residual cuff volumes and changes in elastance and permeability with use. Six new size 4 ProSeal LMAs and 6 new size 4 Classic LMAs were tested. Each LMA underwent a simulated clinical use cycle until it failed the pre-use check tests. The simulated clinical use cycle comprised: i) inflating the cuff to the maximum recommended volume for 1 h; ii) immersion in an enzymatic solution for 3 min; iii) washing the external and internal surfaces; iv) automatic washing for 14 min (< or =85 degrees C); v) drying for 30 min (< or =75 degrees C); and vi) autoclaving at 134 degrees C for 4 min at 206 kPa. Before the first cycle and every 10 subsequent cycles, the cuff was inflated with 40 mL air and the intracuff pressure was measured immediately and 3 h later. The initial intracuff pressure was taken to be an inverse measure of the elastance or resistance to deformation, and the intracuff pressure change were taken as a measure of the permeability. The residual cuff volume was determined for 10 Classic and 10 ProSeal size 4 LMAs using a gas dilution technique. The mean +/- sd (range) longevity for the ProSeal LMA and Classic LMA was 82 +/- 23 (45-109) uses and 133 +/- 35 (76-176) uses, respectively. The ProSeal LMA has a shorter life-span than the Classic LMA (P = 0.01). For the ProSeal LMA, there was no change in elastance or permeability with use. For the Classic LMA, there was a decrease in elastance (P < 0.0001) and an increase in permeability (P < 0.0001) with use. The residual cuff volume was higher for the ProSeal LMA (2.6 +/- 1.3 mL versus 1.5 +/- 0.9, P = 0.04). We conclude that the life-span of the ProSeal LMA is shorter than the Classic LMA, but both exceed the manufacturer's recommendations of 40 uses. We recommend that reusable LMA devices be discarded when they fail the pre-use check tests, rather than after a specific number of uses.

Elasticity↗
PubMed2005

The feasibility of laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation in microgravity during parabolic flight: a comparison of two techniques.

We determined the feasibility of laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation (LG-TI) in microgravity obtained during parabolic flight and tested the hypothesis that LG-TI is similarly successful in the free-floating condition, with the patient's head gripped between the anesthesiologist's knees, as in the restrained condition, with the torso strapped to the surface. Three personnel with no experience in airway management or microgravity participated in the study. LG-TI of a sophisticated full-size manikin was attempted on seven occasions in each condition by each investigator after ground-based training. The parabolic flights, which took place in an Airbus 300 over the Atlantic Ocean, provided 23 s of microgravity. During this time, the investigator opened a box with airway equipment, performed LG-TI, and attached and held onto a self-inflating bag. The efficacy of ventilation was assessed during level flight by squeezing the bag and noting whether the manikin sensors indicated a tidal volume > or =300 mL. There were no differences in ventilation success (41% versus 33%) or time to successful insertion (both 18 s) between the free-floating and the restrained conditions. More than 90% of failures were caused by the inability to insert the tracheal tube within 23 s. There were no differences in performance among investigators. We conclude that LG-TI is feasible in microgravity obtained during parabolic flight, but the success rate is infrequent because of severe time restrictions. There were no differences in success rate between the free-floating condition, with the head gripped between the knees, and the restrained condition, with the torso strapped to the surface.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

In cadavers, directly measured mucosal pressures are similar for the Unique and the Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway devices.

PURPOSE: We compare the Soft Seal and Unique single-use, plastic laryngeal mask airway devices with respect to intracuff pressure, directly measured mucosal pressure and in vitro elastance. METHODS: Ten fresh male cadavers were studied. Microchip pressure sensors were attached to the following locations: A) the anterior middle part of the cuff side; B) the posterior tip of the cuff; C) the anterior base of the cuff; D) the posterior middle part of the cuff side; E) the backplate; and F) the posterior tube. The size 5 Unique and size 5 Soft Seal were inserted in random order using laryngoscope-guidance. Intracuff pressure and mucosal pressure were documented at 0 to 40 mL cuff volume in 10 mL increments. In vitro elastance was determined between 20 to 40 mL cuff volume. RESULTS: For both devices, mucosal pressure increased with cuff volume at most locations. Intracuff pressures and in vitro elastance (5.2 +/- 0.7 cm H(2)O/mL vs 3.8 +/- 0.4 cm H(2)O/mL, P < 0.0001) were higher for the Unique than the Soft Seal (P < 0.0001), but there were no differences in mucosal pressures at any location or cuff volume. CONCLUSION: Intracuff pressures and in vitro elastance are higher for the Unique than the Soft Seal, but mucosal pressures are similar suggesting that the airway morbidity will be similar.

Aged↗