PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joseph Del Pizzo

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph Del Pizzo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hand-assisted laparoscopy for large renal specimens: a multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVES: To present our experience with hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) for larger renal specimens. One of the theoretical benefits of HAL is the ability to manage large renal specimens, which we defined as tumors greater than 7 cm, and tumors in obese patients. METHODS: Between March 1998 and October 2000, 106 HAL radical nephrectomies were performed for enhancing renal masses, for which 95 patients had complete preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Of the 95 patients, 32 underwent HAL for large tumors (7 cm or greater) and 41 had a body mass index of 31 or greater. The demographic and outcome data of these two groups were compared with 63 patients who underwent HAL for tumors less than 7 cm and 54 patients with a body mass index of less than 31. RESULTS: When comparing cohorts by tumor size, the only statistically significant differences were in convalescence and specimen weight. Patients with lesions 7 cm or greater required 21 days to recover compared with 18 days for patients with lesions less than 7 cm. Obese patients had statistically significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications, longer operative times (214 versus 176 minutes), and longer convalescences (21 versus 17.5 days) compared with nonobese patients. The estimated blood loss and conversion rate was not different between the groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted between the groups in the incidence of positive margins, local recurrence, or metastatic recurrence at a mean follow-up of 12.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: HAL provides a safe, reproducible, and minimally invasive technique to remove large renal tumors and renal tumors in the obese.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

Practice patterns among urologic surgeons treating localized renal cell carcinoma in the laparoscopic age: technology versus oncology.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopy on practice patterns at a single institution in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Many now regard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) as a standard of care in the management of localized renal cell carcinoma. As laparoscopy becomes more prevalent in the urologic community, practice patterns are changing. METHODS: We analyzed the renal cancer surgical database at the Weill Medical College of Cornell University from 1997 to 2002. We compared three groups, including open radical nephrectomy (ORN), open partial nephrectomy (OPN), and LRN. RESULTS: A total of 222 consecutive renal surgeries done for presumed malignancy were performed from 1997 to 2002. A total of 194 were assessable. Of these, 63 were OPNs, 51 were ORNs, and 80 were LRNs. When analyzed over time, during the latter half of 2000, 89% of all LRNs were performed on tumors less than 4 cm in size. More recently, in 2002, only 42% of LRNs were performed for tumors 4 cm or less in size. From 1997 to 2000, 30% of all OPNs were done on tumors greater than 4 cm compared with 28% from 2000 to 2002. Of 30 OPNs performed from 1997 to 2000, 21 (70%) were performed on small (4 cm or less) tumors compared with 24 (73%) of 33 from 2000 to 2002. CONCLUSIONS: From 2000 to 2002, the percentage of tumors less than 4 cm that were treated with LRN has increased with time. In the ORN cohort, the percentage of nephrectomies performed on small tumors (less than 4 cm) has decreased with time, and the trends in the OPN group have remained relatively stable. As an institution becomes more comfortable with laparoscopic techniques, technological concerns are likely to play less of a role in determining treatment algorithms among treating urologists.

Aged↗