PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joseph Eustace

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph Eustace.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) may have less accuracy for the diagnosis and the assessment of the severity of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of both ERC and MRC in PSC. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: ERCs and MRCs of 36 patients with PSC and 51 controls (normal/other biliary tract diseases) were read in an independent, blinded, and random fashion by 2 magnetic resonance radiologists and 2 interventional endoscopists by using a previously validated classification system. Readers had no access to clinical history, laboratory results, or patient mix. RESULTS: Extrahepatic ductal (EHD) and intrahepatic ductal (IHD) visualization was excellent in 64% of 66% of MRCs and 86% of 74% of ERCs. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PSC for readers 1 to 4 were 91% and 85%, 88% and 90%, 81% and 96%, and 83% and 96%. respectively. Receiver operating curve values were excellent for all readers (all >0.9). Interobserver agreement (kappa statistics) for the diagnosis of PSC (MRC, 0.83; ERC, 0.73) and for identifying the presence of IHD strictures (MRC, 0.64; ERC, 0.86) was good for both modalities, but only ERC (ERC, 0.55; MRC, 0.36) was good for the presence and the severity of EHD strictures. When assessment of disease severity was limited to the 36 patients with PSC, interobserver agreement was very poor for both MRC (0.23 and 0.07 for EHD and IHD, respectively) and ERC (0.24 and 0.34 for EHD and IHD, respectively). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective case-control study made it difficult to assess the impact of the diagnosis on patient management. CONCLUSIONS: ERC and MRC were comparable for diagnosing PSC, with very good interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of PSC and IHD strictures. Only ERC had good agreement for EHD strictures. Interobserver agreement was very poor for both MRC and ERC when disease severity of PSC was assessed.

Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic↗
PubMed2006

Incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among HIV patients receiving dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is increasing in incidence in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It is not known whether the morbidity and mortality rate of ASCVD is similarly increasing among patients with HIV end-stage renal disease (ESRD), who are living longer since the initiation of newer therapeutic regimens in 1997. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study of 8,312 HIV ESRD patients enrolled in the US Renal Data System from 1987 to 2001. We determined the incidence of fatal and nonfatal ASCVD events stratified by date of dialysis therapy initiation. RESULTS: There were 3,112 HIV ESRD patients (77.9% men; mean age, 39.6 +/- 9.6 years) who initiated dialysis therapy before 1997 and 2,371 patients (71.5% men; mean age, 41.3 +/- 9.7 years) who initiated dialysis therapy after 1997. Cumulative incidences of ASCVD for those initiating dialysis therapy before 1997 compared with after 1997 were 10.6% versus 13.5% at 12 months, 18.8% versus 27.6% at 24 months, 26.2% versus 42.4% at 36 months, and 33.7% versus 65.9% at 48 months (P < 0.0001 by log rank). Those who initiated dialysis therapy after 1997 had a greater risk for developing ASCVD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 1.92) than those who initiated dialysis therapy before 1997 after adjusting for demographics and ASCVD risk factors. CONCLUSION: There is an increased risk for ASCVD in patients with HIV who initiated dialysis therapy after 1997. This may reflect the long-term complications of multidrug regimens, as well as improved survival from these regimens leading to prolonged exposure to ASCVD risk factors.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Effect of race on outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is significant evidence to suggest that long-term survival after renal transplantation is significantly lower in African Americans than in other races. We aimed to establish whether there was a difference in survival in African Americans compared with other races after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and whether race was an independent predictor of survival. METHODS: We collected data from the United Network of Organ Sharing transplant registry for all liver transplants done between 1988 and 1996 in the USA. We also recorded information on age, sex, race, blood group, and cause of death for the donors and recipients. FINDINGS: 2-year graft survival was significantly lower for African Americans (601 of 884, 68%) and Asians (266 of 416, 64%) compared with white Americans (8703 of 11762, 74%) and Hispanics (878 of 1220, 72%). 2-year and 5-year patient survival were significantly lower for African Americans (654 of 884 [74%], 270 of 565 [48%]) and Asians (287 of 416 [69%], 92 of 252 [37%]) compared with white Americans (9786 of 11762 [83%], 4357 of 7514 [58%]) and Hispanics (964 of 1220 [79%], 341 of 657 [52%]). Compared with white Americans, African American (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.16-1.60, p<0.0001) and Asian (1.25, 1.01-1.56, p=0.03) race were independent predictors of poor survival at 2 years. INTERPRETATION: African Americans and Asians have a worse outcome after OLT compared with white Americans and Hispanics. The higher rate of chronic rejection in African Americans and a relatively worse outcome in other minority races merits further examination.

Adult↗