Biomedical subjects

Joseph M Leonard

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph M Leonard.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions.

Several different functions have been put forward for evaluating the energetics of ligand binding to proteins. Those employed in the DOCK, GOLD and FlexX docking programs have been especially widely used, particularly in connection with virtual high-throughput screening (vHTS) projects. Until recently, such evaluation functions were usually considered only in conjunction with the docking programs that relied on them. In such studies, the evaluation function in question actually fills two distinct roles: it serves as the objective function being optimized (fitness function), but is also the scoring function used to compare the candidate docking configurations generated by the program. We have used descriptions available in the open literature to create free-standing scoring functions based on those used in DOCK and GOLD, and have implemented the more recently formulated PMF [J. Med. Chem. 42 (1999) 791] scoring function as well. The performance of these functions was examined individually for each of several data sets for which both crystal structures and affinities are available, as was the performance of the FlexX scoring function. Various ways of combining individual scores into a consensus score (CScore) were also considered. The individual and consensus scores were also used to try to pick out configurations most similar to those found in crystal structures from among a set of candidate configurations produced by FlexX docking runs. We find that the reliability and interpretability of results can be improved by combining results from all four functions into a CScore.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗

PubMedDate not supplied

OptiDock: virtual HTS of combinatorial libraries by efficient sampling of binding modes in product space.

Products from combinatorial libraries generally share a common core structure that can be exploited to improve the efficiency of virtual high-throughput screening (vHTS). In general, it is more efficient to find a method that scales with the total number of reagents (Sigma growth) rather with the number of products (Pi growth). The OptiDock methodology described herein entails selecting a diverse but representative subset of compounds that span the structural space encompassed by the full library. These compounds are docked individually using the FlexX program (Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 251, 470-489) to define distinct docking modes in terms of reference placements for combinatorial core atoms. Thereafter, substituents in R-cores (consisting of the core structure substituted at a single variation site) are docked, keeping the core atoms fixed at the coordinates dictated by each reference placement. Interaction energies are calculated for each docked R-core with respect to the target protein, and energies for whole compounds are calculated by finding the reference core placement for which the sum of corresponding R-core energies is most negative. The use of diverse whole compounds to define binding modes is a key advantage of the protocol over other combinatorial docking programs. As a result, OptiDock returns better-scoring conformers than does serially applied FlexX. OptiDock is also better able to find a viable docked pose for each library member than are other combinatorial approaches.

Binding Sites↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The effects of biasing torsional mutations in a conformational GA.

This paper describes the effects of incorporating torsional bias into a conformational Genetic Algorithm (GA) such as that found in the GASP program. Several major conclusions can be drawn. Biasing torsional angles toward values associated with local energy minima increases the rate of convergence of the fitness function (consisting of energy, steric, and pharmacophoric compatibility terms) for a set of molecules, but a definite tradeoff exists between total model energy and the steric and pharmacophoric compatibility terms in the fitness score. Biasing torsions in favor of sets of angles drawn from low-energy conformations does not guarantee low total energy, but biased torsional sampling does generally produce less strained models than does the uniform torsional sampling in classical GASP. Overall, torsionally biased sampling produces good models comprised of energetically favorable ligand conformations.

Algorithms↗