PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joseph W Basler

Publications and source records attributed to Joseph W Basler.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Selenium accumulation in prostate tissue during a randomized, controlled short-term trial of l-selenomethionine: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Epidemiologic and clinical data suggest that selenium could prevent prostate cancer, but it has not been shown that supplemental selenium leads to an increased concentration of selenium in prostate tissue compared with adjacent tissue. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, controlled, short-term trial of l-selenomethionine (SeMet) versus observation in men with organ-confined prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was the measurement of selenium concentration in prostate tissue and seminal vesicle (SV). We assessed baseline selenium levels in serum and in toenail specimens (reflecting long-term intake) and post-intervention selenium levels in serum, and in prostate and SV tissues using hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectroscopy. RESULTS: Sixty-six eligible patients were randomly assigned to the SeMet (n = 34) or observation (n = 32) arm; both arms had similar baseline patient characteristics. Baseline serum selenium was similar in the two groups (P = 0.64). Baseline toenail selenium levels were slightly higher in the SeMet group than in the control group (P = 0.07). After the intervention, the mean serum selenium level increased 15% in the SeMet arm and was higher than in the observation arm (P = 0.001). The selenium concentration in prostate tissue was 22% higher in the SeMet arm (n = 26) than in the observation arm (n = 25; 1.80 versus 1.47 ppm; P = 0.003, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and remained significantly higher after adjusting for chronic selenium intake (P = 0.021, ANCOVA). SV selenium concentration was similar in both groups (P = 0.384) and was lower than in prostate tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to show that selenium taken as oral supplementation accumulates preferentially in the human prostate gland as opposed to the SV. These findings support the hypothesis that oral selenium supplementation may contribute to the cancer preventive effects of selenium.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Prostate cancer detection strategies.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and, as a result, there has been a nationwide emphasis on screening and detection. With the widespread use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate cancer screening effectively detects localized prostate cancer. However, recent reports have identified a significant proportion of prostate cancer in men with low PSA levels. Many of these cancers are higher-grade malignancies. Consequently, PSA may function more effectively as a screening tool when applied over a continuum that is associated with degree of risk, rather than a binary measure. Other markers are currently being investigated. Ideally, a marker will identify the malignancy that is a clinical threat, thereby avoiding intervention for indolent disease. Prevention strategies may be employed for higher-risk patients, and these strategies eventually may be tailored to genetic or other risks.

Genetic Markers↗
PubMed2006

Dealing with non-cancerous findings on prostate biopsy.

Most prostate biopsies do not show malignancy. The proper management of non-cancerous pathologic findings of the prostate is controversial. For this article, we reviewed the current literature for indications for repeat prostate biopsy after initial biopsies demonstrated non-cancerous prostatic tissue or benign prostatic hyperplasia. This review includes discussions of management of asymptomatic prostatitis and how it may affect prostate-specific antigen, and also the management of several potentially premalignant lesions such as atrophy, atypical small acinar proliferation, and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. There is a paucity of randomized trials in this area and, considering the high number of biopsies with non-malignant findings, we conclude that more investigation is warranted in this area.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2006

Prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis by central and peripheral bone mineral density in men with prostate cancer during androgen-deprivation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis by central (spine and hip) and peripheral (radius) bone mineral density (BMD) in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Low BMD and fractures are prevalent in this group of men. Most published studies on ADT-related bone loss have documented the loss of BMD in the spine and hip as measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry. In one study, the loss of BMD was most pronounced at the radius. METHODS: In a chart review of patients receiving ADT, the spine and hip BMD results were recorded in 89 patients. Of these 89 patients, the BMD of the radius was also recorded in 53. RESULTS: In the 89 patients with BMD measurements of the spine and hip, 24 (26.9%) had osteoporosis of the hip or spine as defined by a T score of -2.5 or less, and 45 patients (50.6%) had osteopenia (T score -1.0 to -2.5). In the subset of 53 patients who also had the BMD of the radius measured, the results of the BMD of the radius changed the category of diagnosis in 18 patients (34%). The prevalence of osteoporosis increased from 25% to 53% when the results of the radius were included. CONCLUSIONS: Men with prostate cancer treated with ADT have a high prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis as determined by peripheral and central BMD measurements. The use of the peripheral BMD measurement appears to identify more patients with osteoporosis and suggests its use in the evaluation of osteoporosis in men receiving ADT.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of mechanical bowel preparation methods in urinary diversion surgery.

OBJECTIVES: We performed the first prospective, randomized, multi-center comparison of overall quality and patient tolerability of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sodium phosphate (NaP) solution for mechanical bowel preparation prior to urinary diversion surgery. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2003, 36 patients at six institutions underwent major urological reconstructive surgery incorporating small intestine (35 radical cystectomy with urinary diversion and 1 bladder augmentation). Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either oral polyethylene glycol (group 1, n = 16) or sodium phosphate (group 2, n = 20) for mechanical bowel preparation prior to surgery, according to our multi-institutional IRB-approved protocol. All patients completed a questionnaire the morning of surgery to assess the tolerability and side effects of each agent. Quality of the bowel preparation was recorded based on intraoperative findings of the attending surgeon, who was blinded to the preparation method. RESULTS: Both bowel cleansing regimens were safe and well tolerated. Patient-reported ease of use and subjective incidence of side effects were statistically similar in the two groups, and a statistically non-significant trend to more bloating in the PEG group was also noted (p = 0.085). Surgeon-scored overall quality of preparation adequacy revealed no significant differences between oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol solutions (p = 0.555). Postoperative complications were rare for each bowel preparation agent. CONCLUSIONS: Performance characteristics of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol bowel preparations appear to be similar. Each method is safe, efficacious, and well-tolerated when used prior to urinary diversion surgery. The cost for the NaP preparation was $1.40 versus $19.70 for the PEG bowel preparation. Sodium phosphate may have a slight advantage because of its convenience and economic advantage.

Cathartics↗
PubMed2005

What's new in the field of prostate cancer chemoprevention?

Chemoprevention trials for several malignancies are completed, planned, or underway. Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer and understandably has received considerable recent attention as a potential target for chemoprevention. This article examines chemoprevention trials for prostate cancer, including the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial, and cyclooxygenase inhibitors in the prevention of prostate cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Local and systemic therapy for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: should the primary tumor be treated?

Data from well-designed, prospective clinical trials are lacking to support treatment of primary tumor in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that treatment of the primary tumor may enhance cancer control and survival in some men. This evidence is examined and recommendations are made for identifying patients with metastatic prostate cancer who may benefit from definitive treatment of the prostate tumor.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

Multidisciplinary management of prostate malignancy.

Most urologic malignancies are diagnosed initially and managed by urologists. However, better outcomes may be attained by integrating the surgical, medical, and radiologic disciplines. The primary care physician remains an important cornerstone whose talents should not be underestimated in the overall patient management scheme. Additional services such as endocrinology, physical therapy, pain control, hospice, nutrition, biofeedback, and hyperbarics, among others, should be considered in the overall health care team. The organization of the team, including definition of the duties of key personnel and even the physical framework of the clinic, contribute to its success in treating patients with prostate cancer. Pitfalls of the process also are discussed in this article.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed2005

The modulation of prostate cancer risk with alpha-tocopherol: a pilot randomized, controlled clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Studies suggest that vitamin E may decrease the risk of prostate cancer. The Prevention Research Veteran Affairs E-vitamin Nutrition Trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study designed to assess the effects of vitamin E supplementation on biomarkers associated with prostate cancer risk in peripheral blood and prostate tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients with increased prostate specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination on initial evaluation were randomized to receive 400 IU vitamin E (22) vs placebo (22). Serum vitamin E, PSA, dehydroepiandrosterone, testosterone and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) were measured in the 2 groups at baseline and then at 3-month intervals. Results are reported in 28 patients (placebo in 14 and vitamin E in 14) who completed the treatment as specified by the protocol. RESULTS: Serum Vitamin E was significantly higher in patients on vitamin E supplementation. alpha-Tocopherol supplementation did not affect the levels of PSA, serum androgens (testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone) or (IGF-1). CONCLUSIONS: Serum alpha-tocopherol is increased by oral supplementation of vitamin E. We found that alpha-tocopherol supplementation has no effect on serum androgens, IGF-1 or PSA. The lack of an effect of vitamin supplementation on PSA avoids any bias in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in vitamin E treated patients. Our results suggest that a decrease in prostate cancer risk with alpha-tocopherol is likely to occur through a mechanism that is nonhormonal and independent of IGF-1.

Antioxidants↗
PubMed2004

What's new in the field of prostate cancer chemoprevention?

Chemoprevention trials for several malignancies are completed, planned, or underway. Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer and understandably has received considerable recent attention as a potential target for chemoprevention. This article examines chemoprevention trials for prostate cancer, including the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial, and cyclooxygenase inhibitors in the prevention of prostate cancer.

Antioxidants↗
PubMed2004

The potential role of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in the prevention of urologic conditions.

Prevention of urologic cancer is a new field for urology. It focuses attention on men and women who may not be under the regular care of physicians and are without symptoms of disease. Although risk factors (eg, smoking in bladder cancer, family history or African-American ethnicity in prostate cancer, cryptorchid testes in testis cancer, Von Hippel-Lindau disease in renal cell carcinoma) can identify individuals at a greater risk for genitourinary malignancies, most patients have no risk factors except gender and age. Thus, developing public health recommendations that will have a major impact on these diseases will be challenging. Prevention strategies will be held to a higher standard of safety than traditional cancer treatment unless populations at a high risk for disease can be identified. It will be necessary for urologists to monitor the field of disease prevention because of the high frequency of urologic malignancies and the growing elderly population in the United States. Urologists are frequently providers for and confidants of this patient population and must be able to counsel these men and women about the benefits and risks of such prevention strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors for prostate cancer chemoprevention.

PURPOSE: There is increasing evidence that using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decreases the incidence of clinically apparent prostate cancer. We review the potential mechanisms of cancer reduction with cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and the clinical evidence suggesting their effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review using MEDLINE was conducted of animal, observational, and clinical studies of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cancer, specifically prostate cancer. The Physician Data Query database was searched for current studies of COX-2 inhibitors for chemoprevention of prostate cancer. RESULTS: Research suggests that COX-2 inhibiting medications are determinants in lower cancer incidence rates. Other studies have suggested up-regulation of the COX-2 enzyme in prostate cancer compared with normal prostate tissue. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently under study to evaluate their potential roles in preventing prostate cancer in high-risk patients (rofecoxib) or the recurrence of bladder cancer (celecoxib). Agents such as exisulind, which is a selective apoptotic antineoplastic drug, are also under investigation. CONCLUSION: COX-2 inhibitors are promising agents for the chemoprevention of prostate cancer but further research is needed.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Bone loss following hypogonadism in men with prostate cancer treated with GnRH analogs.

It is known that bone mineral density (BMD) is low in men who are hypogonadal. However, the rate and sites of bone loss following testosterone deficiency are not known. The resulting hypogonadism after GnRH analog therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer allows us to examine bone loss and bone resorption immediately after testosterone withdrawal. Therefore, we examined the effects of GnRH analog treatment on bone loss and bone resorption in men with prostate cancer. BMD and serum and urine concentrations of markers of bone turnover were determined in men with prostate cancer and in age-matched controls. Measurements were taken before GnRH therapy and 6 and 12 months after instituting therapy. After 12 months of GnRH therapy, the BMD of the total hip and ultra distal radius decreased significantly (P < 0.001) in men with prostate cancer compared with the controls. The mean bone loss was 3.3% and 5.3%, respectively. The observed reduction in BMD in the spine (2.8%) and the femoral neck (2.3%) did not reach statistical significance. No significant bone loss was observed in the control subjects. The concentration of the urine marker of bone resorption, N-telopeptide, was significantly increased from baseline and from controls at both 6 and 12 months in patients treated with GnRH analog therapy compared with control subjects (P < 0.05). The concentration of a serum marker of bone formation, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, was not significantly different from baseline or from controls at 6 and 12 months. Thus, the decreased total hip and ultra distal radius BMD and increased urinary N-telopeptide concentration after testosterone withdrawal demonstrate an increase in trabecular bone loss and enhanced bone resorption. These findings demonstrate a significant loss of bone in men with prostate cancer after receiving GnRH therapy and suggest that the total hip and radius are the preferred sites for monitoring bone loss in older men. In addition, markers of bone resorption may be helpful.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗