Biomedical subjects

Josete B C Meira

Publications and source records attributed to Josete B C Meira.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at comparing the stress distribution in shear and micro-shear test set-ups using finite element analysis, and suggesting some parameter standardization that might have important influence on the results. METHODS: Two-dimensional plane strain finite element analysis was performed using MSCPatran and MSCMarc softwares. Model configurations were based on published experimental shear and micro-shear test set-ups and material properties were assumed to be isotropic, homogeneous and linear-elastic. Typical values of elastic modulus and Poisson's ratios were assigned to composite, dentin and adhesive. Loading conditions considered a single-node concentrated load at different distances from the dentin-adhesive interface, and proportional geometry (1:5 scale, but fixed adhesive layer thickness in 50microm) with similar calculated nominal strength. The maximum tensile and shear stresses, and stress distribution along dentin-adhesive interfacial nodes were analyzed. RESULTS: Stress distribution was always non-uniform and greatly differed between shear and micro-shear models. A pronounced stress concentration was observed at the interfacial edges due to the geometric change: stress values farther exceeded the nominal strength and tensile stresses were much higher than shear stresses. For micro-shear test, the relatively thicker adhesive layer and use of low modulus composites may lead to relevant stress intensification. An appropriate loading distance was established for each test (1mm for shear and 0.1mm for micro-shear) in which stress concentration would be minimal, and should be standardized for experimental assays. SIGNIFICANCE: The elastic modulus of bonded composites, relative adhesive layer thickness and load application distance are important parameters to be standardized, once they influence stress concentration.

Composite Resins↗

PubMed2006

Composite shrinkage stress as a function of specimen dimensions and compliance of the testing system.

OBJECTIVES: Verify the influence of specimen dimensions on composite shrinkage stress in testing systems of known compliance and in situations where axial strain of bonding substrates was suppressed. Stress distribution was evaluated using finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: A chemically activated composite (Bisfill 2B, Bisco) was inserted between the flat surfaces of two glass rods (2, 4 or 6mm diameter, D) attached to a universal testing machine. Specimen height (H) was defined by adjusting the distance between the rods (0.5, 1, 2 or 4mm). An extensometer was used to monitor the distance between them. Maximum force after 30min of polymerization was divided by the cross-sectional area of the rod to obtain nominal stress (sigma(n)). Mathematical equations were employed in order to estimate the 'corrected nominal stress' (sigma(cor)) that would be obtained in ideally rigid systems. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey test (alpha=0.05) and regression analysis (stress versus 'C factor' and stress versus specimen volume). Axysimetrical 2D models were used to evaluate X-component stress distribution (sigma(x)) in the zero compliance condition. RESULTS: The interactions between D and H were significant for sigma(n) and sigma(cor) (p<0.001). For D=2mm, height influenced only sigma(cor) values. A direct correlation was found between stress and C factor (sigma(n):R(2)=0.959; sigma(cor):R(2)=0.923), but not between stress and volume. FEA evidenced the effect of boundary restraints on sigma(x). SIGNIFICANCE: Specimen dimensions influenced test results, mostly regarding sigma(cor). Stress values strongly increased with the confinement of the specimen probably due to stress concentration adjacent to the bonded interface.

Compliance↗

PubMed2004

Stress concentration in microtensile tests using uniform material.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to analyze the stress concentration factor (Kt) in specimens of uniform material with the most commonly used geometry (square hourglass) during microtensile tests using finite element analysis. Standardization is emphasized with the aim of obtaining the most representative nominal strength of the material. METHODS: Eighty cases were simulated using three-dimensional models, in which we varied the fixation of specimens in the jig (f = 1 or 2 sides), the height of this fixed region (h = 1 or 2.75 mm), the specimen width (D = 1.5, 2, 3, 4 or 5 mm), and the radius of curvature of the notch (r = 0.2, 0.5, 0.7 or 1 mm). The cross-sectional area (1 mm2) remained constant in all analyses. The stress concentration factor Kt (maximum tensile stress/nominal tensile stress) was calculated. RESULTS: A 150% difference was observed from the lowest Kt value (1.3) to the highest one (3.2). Results indicated that the radius of curvature is a very influential geometric parameter in microtensile strength tests (variation in Kt values up to 47.4%). For two-side fixed specimens, the Kt values varied from 3 to 4%, while the one-side fixed models resulted in variations from 11 to 15%. CONCLUSION: Variations in the specimen geometry and mode of load application can be responsible for part of the different strength values obtained in microtensile tests. The specimen fixation by two sides is a simple and easily performed method to reduce the stress concentration factor and its variations induced by specimen geometry and test assembly.

Acrylic Resins↗