PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joshua Cleland

Publications and source records attributed to Joshua Cleland.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Abdominal differential diagnosis in a patient referred to a physical therapy clinic for low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Resident's case problem. BACKGROUND: Acute back pain most often presents as musculoskeletal in nature; however, less frequently it may be the result of an underlying, or coexisting, systemic pathology. When present, the signs and symptoms of systemic pathology can mimic, or be masked by, musculoskeletal back pain, which may pose a diagnostic challenge during the clinical evaluation. The purpose of this resident's case problem is to describe the clinical reasoning process leading to a medical referral for a patient who presented to physical therapy with debilitating low back pain. DIAGNOSIS: The patient in this resident's case problem was a 67-year-old male referred to physical therapy with a 2-week history of severe low back pain and muscle spasms. The patient history and physical examination were suggestive of musculoskeletal back pain and physical therapy treatment was initiated. Abdominal pain was elicited during an introductory therapeutic exercise, which was recognized by the therapist as a potential sign of abdominal pathology. The therapist performed an additional review of systems and an abdominal screening examination, which established the necessity of an immediate medical referral. At the emergency department, ominous abdominal pathology was safely ruled out through diagnostic imaging and the patient was treated for secondary gastrointestinal effects of opioid analgesic medications. DISCUSSION: This resident's case problem provides an opportunity to discuss the clinical reasoning process leading to the suspicion of abdominal pathology. Specifically, this case reinforces the importance of recognizing potential signs of systemic pathology, executing an appropriate physical examination, including screening of the involved anatomical region, and providing an appropriate medical referral when indicated.

Abdominal Pain↗

The effects of hamstring stretching on range of motion: a systematic literature review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the literature regarding the most effective positions, techniques, and durations of stretching to improve hamstring muscle flexibility. BACKGROUND: Hamstring stretching is popular among physical therapists, athletic trainers, and fitness/coaching professionals; however, numerous stretching methodologies have been proposed in the literature. This fact establishes a need to systematically summarize available evidence in an attempt to determine the most effective stretching approach. METHODS: A list of 28 pertinent manuscripts that included randomized and clinical trials was created according to specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. These manuscripts were critically reviewed for quality according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) (10-point) scale and descriptive information about the stretching parameters employed in the research. RESULTS: Cumulatively, 1338 healthy subjects were included in the reviewed studies. Methodological quality scores ranged from 2 to 8 (mean +/- SD, 4.3 +/- 1.6). Several methodological flaws were frequently recognized, including failure to conceal group allocation or perform blinded assessment. All studies reported improvements in range of motion after stretching. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, methodological quality was poor, with only 21.4% (6/28) of studies achieving a score between 6 and 8. Thus it was difficult to confidently identify 1 most effective hamstring stretching method. Instead, the evidence appears to indicate that hamstring stretching increases range of motion with a variety of stretching techniques, positions, and durations.

Exercise↗

Effectiveness of manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education on bilateral disc displacement without reduction- of the temporomandibular joint: a single-case design.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-case A1-B-A2 design. OBJECTIVE: To determine if manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education would be an effective management strategy for a patient with a disc displacement without reduction of both temporomandibular joints. BACKGROUND: A number of conservative management strategies have been proposed for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. However, little evidence exists to indicate the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in patients with bilateral disc displacement without reduction. METHODS AND MEASURES: Phase A1 of the study consisted of a baseline condition in which no intervention was initiated. Phase B included manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education focusing on the temporomandibular joint and cervical spine. Phase A2 consisted of withdrawal of the intervention. The Steigerwald/Maher disability questionnaire was used to collect data relative to function. A visual analog scale was used to collect pain data and maximal mouth opening measurements were obtained as an indicator of range of motion. Visual analysis and the 2 standard deviation band method of statistical analysis were used to compare data. RESULTS: Following the implementation of the intervention phase, the patient demonstrated significant reductions in pain and improvements in maximal mouth opening and function as measured by the Steigerwald/Maher disability questionnaire. These observed improvements were maintained at the time of a 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education may have been an effective management strategy for a patient with bilateral disc displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joints. Further outcome studies in the form of randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the clinical utility of this treatment approach in a larger population.

Adult↗

Standing and Supine Hamstring Stretching Are Equally Effective.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of standing and supine hamstring stretching in increasing hamstring flexibility as measured by increasing range of motion at the knee. DESIGN AND SETTING: The trial was randomized, and the setting was local academic physical therapy and physical therapist assistant programs. SUBJECTS: Twenty-nine healthy subjects who exhibited limited hamstring muscle flexibility bilaterally (22 women, 7 men, 25.9 +/- 6.13 years of age) volunteered to participate in this study. Subjects were randomly assigned a different stretch for each leg. Each leg was stretched 3 days per week for 3 weeks (3 x 30 seconds). Stretching sessions were supervised. MEASUREMENTS: We measured supine active knee extension. Measurements were taken before and after the 3-week stretching phase by the same investigator, who was blind to limb assignment. We calculated a 2-way mixed-design analysis of variance and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference post hoc tests to analyze data. An independent t test was performed to determine whether the change scores in the stretching groups differed by sex. RESULTS: Prestretching and poststretching measurements were significantly different for both the standing and supine stretch (<0.05). No significant difference (P > .05) in change score existed between the 2 stretches or between the sexes. CONCLUSIONS: The standing and supine hamstring stretches were comparably effective in improving flexibility.

Journal Article↗