PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joshua L Cherry

Publications and source records attributed to Joshua L Cherry.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Genome size and operon content.

Prokaryotic genes are often organized into operons, clusters of genes that are transcribed together. Because all genes in an operon must be transcribed in the same direction, this organization will be reflected in a tendency for nearby genes to have the same orientation. This tendency can be used to estimate the degree to which the genes in a genome are clustered into operons. Application of the technique to Escherichia coli yields results that are similar to estimates based on detailed examination of the genome and empirical knowledge about particular operons. Results for Saccharomyces cerevisiae are consistent with the near absence of polycistronic transcripts in eukaryotes. The method is easily applied to other genomes that have been sequenced and annotated. Analysis of 26 bacterial and archaeal genomes indicates that the degree of clustering varies widely among prokaryotes. Comparison of these genomes shows that those containing more genes tend to have less clustering of genes into operons. This observation may have implications concerning the evolution of operons.

Escherichia coli↗
PubMed2003

A diffusion approximation for selection and drift in a subdivided population.

The population-genetic consequences of population structure are of great interest and have been studied extensively. An area of particular interest is the interaction among population structure, natural selection, and genetic drift. At first glance, different results in this area give very different impressions of the effect of population subdivision on effective population size (N(e)), suggesting that no single value of N(e) can completely characterize a structured population. Results presented here show that a population conforming to Wright's island model of subdivision with genic selection can be related to an idealized panmictic population (a Wright-Fisher population). This equivalent panmictic population has a larger size than the actual population; i.e., N(e) is larger than the actual population size, as expected from many results for this type of population structure. The selection coefficient in the equivalent panmictic population, referred to here as the effective selection coefficient (s(e)), is smaller than the actual selection coefficient (s). This explains how the fixation probability of a selected allele can be unaffected by population subdivision despite the fact that subdivision increases N(e), for the product N(e)s(e) is not altered by subdivision.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed2003

Selection in a subdivided population with dominance or local frequency dependence.

The interplay between population structure and natural selection is an area of great interest. It is known that certain types of population subdivision do not alter fixation probabilities of selected alleles under genic, frequency-independent selection. In the presence of dominance for fitness or frequency-dependent selection these same types of subdivision can have large effects on fixation probabilities. For example, the barrier to fixation of a fitter allele due to underdominance is reduced by subdivision. Analytic results presented here relate a subdivided population that conforms to a finite island model to an approximately equivalent panmictic population. The size of this equivalent population is different from (larger than) the actual size of the subdivided population. Selection parameters are also different in the hypothetical equivalent population. As expected, the degree of dominance is lower in the equivalent population. The results are not limited to dominance but cover any form of polynomial frequency dependence.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed2003

Selection in a subdivided population with local extinction and recolonization.

In a subdivided population, local extinction and subsequent recolonization affect the fate of alleles. Of particular interest is the interaction of this force with natural selection. The effect of selection can be weakened by this additional source of stochastic change in allele frequency. The behavior of a selected allele in such a population is shown to be equivalent to that of an allele with a different selection coefficient in an unstructured population with a different size. This equivalence allows use of established results for panmictic populations to predict such quantities as fixation probabilities and mean times to fixation. The magnitude of the quantity N(e)s(e), which determines fixation probability, is decreased by extinction and recolonization. Thus deleterious alleles are more likely to fix, and advantageous alleles less likely to do so, in the presence of extinction and recolonization. Computer simulations confirm that the theoretical predictions of both fixation probabilities and mean times to fixation are good approximations.

Alleles↗
PubMed2002

Deleterious mutation and the evolution of eusociality.

Certain arguments concerning the evolution of eusociality form a classic example of the application of the principles of kin selection. These arguments center on the different degrees of relatedness of potential beneficiaries of an individual's efforts, for example a female's higher relatedness to her sisters than to her daughters in a haplodiploid system. This type of reasoning is insufficicnt to account for the evolution and maintainence of sexual reproduction, because parthenogenic females produce offspring that are more closely related to them than are offspring produced sexually. Among the forces invoked to explain sexual reproduction is deleterious mutation. This factor can be shown to favor eusociality as well, because siblings produced by helping carry fewer deleterious alleles on average than would offspring. The strength of this effect depends on the genomewide deleterious mutation rate, U, and on the selection coefficient, s, associated with deleterious alleles. For small s, the effect depends approximately on the product Us. This phenomenon illustrates that an assumption implicit in some analyses-that the relatedness of an individual to an actor is all that matters to its value to that actor-can fail for the evolution of eusociality as it does for the evolution of sex.

Animals↗