PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jovan Dimitrijević

Publications and source records attributed to Jovan Dimitrijević.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[Value of urinary cytology findings in the diagnosis of acute renal graft rejection].

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection of allograft is one of the most serious complications of renal transplantation that requires fast and precise diagnostic approach. In this paper our experience in cytologic urinalysis as a diagnostic method of the acute renal allograft rejection was reviewed. METHODS: The study group included 20 of 56 patients with transplanted kidneys who were assumed for the acute allograft rejection according to allograft dysfunction and/or urine cytology findings. Histological findings confirmed allograft rejection in 4 patients. Urine sediment obtained in cytocentrifuge was air-dried and stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa. Acute allograft rejection was suspected if in 10 fields under high magnification 15 or more lymphocytes with renal tubular cells were found. RESULTS: Acute transplant rejection occurred in 32.1% patients. In 15 patients clinical findings of the acute renal allograft rejection corresponded with cytological and histological findings (in the cases in which it was performed). Three patients with clinical signs of the acute allograft rejection were without cytological confirmation, and in 2 patients cytological findings pointed to the acute rejection, but allograft dysfunction was of different etiology (acute tubular necrosis, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity). In patients with clinical, cytological and histological findings of the acute allograft rejection urine finding consisted of 58% lymphocytes, 34% neutrophilic leucocytes and 8% monocytes/macrophages on the average. The accuracy of cytologic urinalysis related to clinical and histological finding was 75%. CONCLUSION: Urine cytology as the reliable, noninvasive, fast and simple method is appropriate as the a first diagnostic line of renal allograft dysfunction, as well as for monitoring of the graft function.

Acute Disease↗

[Importance of cytologic examination of urine in the diagnosis of renal transplant function disorders].

BACKGROUND: This paper presents our experience with cytologic examination of urine in diagnosing renal allograft dysfunction. METHODS: The study group included 23 patients with renal allograft dysfunction, selected from 56 patients who underwent renal transplantation. Etiologic diagnosis was made according to the clinical picture, histological findings during allograft biopsy, and cytologic examination of urine. Urine sediment was obtained in cytocentrifuge and was air dried and stained with May Grunwald Giemsa. RESULTS: Out of 23 patients with allograft dysfunction in 18 (78.3%) patient it was caused by acute rejection, and in 5 (8.9%) patients by allograft infarction, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, acute tubular necrosis and chronic nephropathy. In eighteen patients (78.3%) cytologic examination of urine was pathologic, while in 16 (70%) clinical and histology findings coincided with urine cytology findings. Out of 18 patients with acute allograft rejection in 15 patients cytologic examination of urine coincided with acute rejection. Out of 7 patients with expressed cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, in 5 cytologic examination of urine confirmed the cause of allograft dysfunction, as well as in one of 2 patients with acute tubular necrosis. Cytologic examination of urine indicated parenchymal damage in 2 patients with recurrent disease (membranoproliferative and focal sclerosing glomerulonephritis). In 4 of 5 patients suffering from chronic rejection in a year's monitoring period, urine sediment periodically consisted of lymphocytes, neutrophilic leucocytes, monocyte/macrophages, tubular cells and cylindres, without the predominance of any cell type. In 3 patients allograft dysfunction was caused by infective agents (bacteria, fungus, cytomegalovirus). CONCLUSION: Cytologic examination of urine might be an alternative to histological in diagnosing acute allograft rejection and acute tubular necrosis or nephrototoxicity. Also it might indicate parenchymal disease while the importance of urine cytology in chronic allograft nephropathy needs to be investigated further.

Cytodiagnosis↗

[Expression of the Bcl-2 family of proteins in peripheral blood B-lymphocytes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia].

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a neoplastic disease characterized by the accumulation of morphologically mature monoclonal CD 5+ B cells in the early phase (G0/G1) of the cell cycle. It is considered that the accumulation of neoplastically transformed lymphocytes B (CLL cells) is primarily the consequence of the disturbance, i.e., blockade of these cells' apoptosis process. Apoptosis is the specific process of programmed cell death regulated by numerous extracellular and intracellular mechanisms. The Bcl-2 proteins are well-known modulators of this process. Some of these proteins (such as Bcl-2, and Bcl-XI) are anti-apoptotic, while others (such as Bad or Bax) are pro-apoptotic. Our study included the analysis of 20 peripheral blood specimens from 20 patients with CLL, and 20 peripheral blood specimens of healthy persons who represented the control group. Using Western blotting analysis, we quantitatively examined the protein expression of Bcl-2 family (Bcl-2, Bax, Bad, and Bcl-XI). The level of Bcl-2 (p = 3.68 x 10(-10)), Bax (p = 0.019), and Bad (p = 0.073) proteins expression was significantly increased in all the analyzed peripheral blood samples of patients, while the level of Bcl-XI protein (p = 0.75) did not significantly differ in peripheral blood samples of patients, compared to the controls. The results of this study showed that the increased level of expression of Bcl-2, Bax, and Bad protein represented the most striking feature of CLL cells. Moreover, the variations in the expression of only one protein of the Bcl-2 family could not represent the prognostic parameter in the treatment of this disease.

Apoptosis↗

[Actinomycosis--a multidisciplinary approach to a clinical problem].

Actinomycosis is caused by microorganisms of the Actinomyces species, found in the oral cavity, gastrointestinal and genital tract. Infection by Actimomyces species mainly causes chronic supurative disease of the oral, cervico-facial, thoracic, and abdominal regions. Clinical manifestations have been described at every level, but the disease is relatively rarely diagnosed. The causative agent is considered to be an opportunistic pathogen associated with infection, trauma, surgical procedures, or associated with a neoplasm or foreign body. Symptoms include intermittent fever, weight loss, abdominal or thoracic pain, pseudotumor and tumor masses, and local symptoms from the infected area. Pseudotumor and tumor masses are diagnosed by ultrasonography and computerized tomography. The diagnosis is confirmed by the presence of a causative agent in biopsy or surgically acquired samples. The treatment includes the administration of high doses of antibiotics (penicillin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone) for at least 6-12 months, as well as surgical treatment. Penicillin is a drug of choice. This infection is often polymicrobial, so that antibiotic therapy should include agents that act against the associated pathogens. Treatment outcome and prognosis in these three cases were excellent, despite the prolonged course of the extensive disease.

Actinomycosis↗

[Occurrence of autoimmune chronic hepatitis in siblings].

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic inflamatory disease of the liver of unknown etiology, characterized by the loss of tolerance against hepatic tissue, leading to the destruction of hepatic parenchyma. It predominantly affects females, and rarely occurs in the same family. CASE REPORT: In this paper we presented brother and sister with autoimmune hepatitis according to the criteria of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. CONCLUSION: Because of a possible genetic predisposition to autoimmune hepatitis, the occurrence of the disease in a family member suggested the need to examine other family members.

Adolescent↗

Lupus nephritis: histopathologic features, classification and histologic scoring in renal biopsy.

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most significant manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), although in some cases there is no direct correlation among clinical, serologic and histologic findings. Therefore, renal biopsy and histopathologic classification by the activity and chronicity assessment of LN are considered necessary before the initiation of the treatment. In this paper 311 renal biopsies in patients with LN were analyzed and classified according to the WHO Classification published in 1974. Renal biopsy specimens were routinely processed for standard analysis by light microscopy (LM), immunofluorescent (IF), and electron microscopy (EM). Biopsy findings were compared with the common clinical symptoms. It is important to recognize that histopathologic lesions in the analyzed tissue might precede the symptoms and clinical manifestations, and therefore are an important factor in the appropriate therapeutic approach. Histopathological assessment of the class of LN represents an important predictor in most patients because the lesions of LN class I and class II most often have no progression and consequently do not require an aggressive treatment. Diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (class IV) as a severe form of renal lesion requires the application of high doses of corticosteroids and cytotoxic medicaments. The established quantitive indexes have significant predictive value. Activity index (AI) evaluates the presence of fresh inflammatory and potentially reversible lesions and chronicity index (CI) evaluate the presence of irreversible glomerular lesions such as sclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, etc. High AI and low CI, particularly in the class IV of LN, suggest the necessity of an aggressive treatment of the inflammatory process aiming to preserve the renal function. High CI and low AI characterize irreversible sclerosing lesions, where an aggressive treatment is considered unnecessary. Our experience suggests the necessity of introducing the new morphologic elements into the activity and chronicity scoring system which would correlate better the clinical symptoms. This should provide higher reliability of scoring, since it evaluates important elements in clinical-morphologic diagnosis of LN.

Biopsy, Needle↗

[Breast carcinoma with melanocytic differentiation].

Azzopardi and Eusebi were the first to describe pigmented breast cancers in 1977. They postulated that the mammary cancer might become colonized by melanocytes at the expense of the epidermis, which was focally depleted of melanocytes, and that it occurred in most cases of breast cancers in which tumor cells reached the dermal-epidermal interface. Other authors suggested melanocytic differentiation of tumor cells. In this paper a case of a patient with ductal invasive breast cancer with partial melanocytic differentiation was presented, documented by HMB-45 and melan-A reactivity of tumor cells. Tumor was positive with antibodies for estrogen and progesterone receptors, pancytokeratin, negative with antibodies for S-100 protein and vimentin. Masson-Fontana reaction was negative. It was concluded that pigmented tumors should be differentiated from tumors with partial melanocytic differentiation, and that clinical significance of melanocytic differentiation should be analysed on larger number of cases.

Aged↗