Biomedical subjects

Juan Fornoni

Publications and source records attributed to Juan Fornoni.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Host tolerance does not impose selection on natural enemies.

Coevolution between hosts and their natural enemies is believed to operate through the evolution of resistance traits. Although the importance of tolerance to natural enemies as an alternative defensive strategy has been recognized, there is still no consensus about the possible role of host tolerance in the evolutionary outcome of the interaction. Here, using bioassay experiments, we tested the hypothesis that variation in host tolerance among selected plant genotypes could impose a selection pressure upon a specialist herbivore. Tolerance did not affect herbivore larvae survival, weight gain, efficiency of food consumption, total food consumption, developmental time and adult mass. These results therefore do not support the hypothesis that host tolerance could affect natural enemy performance. However, resistance did negatively affect herbivore larva survival. Genetic variation in herbivore larva survival was detected, thus suggesting the potential for a coevolutionary response. Our results indicate that host tolerance would reduce opportunities for a coevolutionary response by the natural enemies of the host. Contrary to predictions from previous models, our results suggest that host tolerance may constitute an evolutionarily unstable defensive strategy.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Evolution of mixed strategies of plant defense allocation against natural enemies.

In this study we present a simple optimization model for the evolution of defensive strategies (tolerance and resistance) of plants against their natural enemies. The model specifically evaluates the consequences of introducing variable costs and benefits of tolerance and resistance and nonlinear cost-and-benefit functions for tolerance and resistance. Incorporating these assumptions, the present model of plant defense predicts different evolutionary scenarios, not expected by previous work. Basically, the presence of an adaptive peak corresponding to intermediate levels of allocation to tolerance and resistance can arise when the shape parameter of the cost function is higher than the corresponding of the benefit function. The presence of two alternatives peaks of maximum tolerance and maximum resistance occurs only when benefits of tolerance and resistance interact less than additive. Finally, the presence of one peak of maximum resistance or maximum tolerance depends on the relative values of the magnitude of costs for tolerance and resistance. An important outcome of our model is that under a plausible set of conditions, variable costs of tolerance and resistance can represent an important aspect involved in the maintenance of intermediate levels of tolerance and resistance, and in favoring adaptive divergence in plant defensive strategies among populations. The model offers a framework for future theoretical and empirical work toward understanding spatial variation in levels of allocation to different defensive strategies.

Adaptation, Biological↗

PubMed2004

Population variation in the cost and benefit of tolerance and resistance against herbivory in Datura stramonium.

In this study we examine the hypothesis that divergent natural selection produces genetic differentiation among populations in plant defensive strategies (tolerance and resistance) generating adaptive variation in defensive traits against herbivory. Controlled genetic material (paternal half-sib families) from two populations of the annual Datura stramonium genetically differentiated in tolerance and resistance to herbivory were used. This set of paternal half-sib families was planted at both sites of origin and the pattern of genotypic selection acting on tolerance and resistance was determined, as well as the presence and variation in the magnitude of allocational costs of tolerance. Selection analyses support the adaptive differentiation hypothesis. Tolerance was favored at the site with higher average level of tolerance, and resistance was favored at the site with higher average level of resistance. The presence of significant environmentally dependent costs of tolerance was in agreement with site variation in the adaptive value of tolerance. Our results support the expectation that environmentally dependent costs of plant defensive strategies can generate differences among populations in the evolutionary trajectory of defensive traits and promote the existence of a selection mosaic. The pattern of contrasting selection on tolerance suggests that, in some populations of D. stramonium, tolerance may alter the strength of reciprocal coevolution between plant resistance and natural enemies.

Adaptation, Biological↗