Biomedical subjects

Julian Roberts

Publications and source records attributed to Julian Roberts.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Experience of bedside preformed silo staged reduction and closure for gastroschisis.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of routine staged reduction and closure at the bedside, using preformed silos with no general anesthesia (PSnoGA), compared to emergency operative fascial closure (OFC) under general anesthesia for gastroschisis (GS). METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control analysis of neonates with GS was performed between 1990 and 2004 inclusively. Assessment included demographics, method of closure, days on ventilator, days to first enteral feed, days to full oral feeds, days on parenteral nutrition, length of hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with GS were treated in our institution between 1990 and 2004. Thirty-five underwent OFC, 4 had Bianchi ward reduction, and 26 received PSnoGA. Seventeen patients with bowel perforation, atresia, ward reduction, medical complications necessitating ventilation, or any other condition requiring urgent surgical intervention were excluded from the analysis. Patients were well matched for gestation and birth weight. Forty-eight patients (OFC = 27 and PSnoGA = 21) were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. Median days on ventilator (4 vs 0; P < or = .0001) was significantly reduced, but there was no difference for days to full oral feeds (26 vs 31; P = .26), days on parenteral nutrition (25 vs 30; P = .28), and length of stay (32 vs 36; P = .32), respectively. Complications were similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PSnoGA has outcomes statistically similar to OFC, although days on ventilator are significantly reduced. Slow reduction of the bowel avoids abdominal compartment syndrome and closure may be achieved without fascial sutures. PSnoGA is performed at the bedside and aims to avoid general anesthesia, a period of ventilation, and out-of-hours operating, thereby reducing costs. A prospective, multicenter, randomized control trial is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of PSnoGA.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed2006

Laparoscopic antegrade continence enema using a two-port technique.

BACKGROUND: The antegrade continence enema is an effective method of treatment of fecal incontinence. We report our experience of a laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure and describe a simple approach to this procedure using a two-port technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 12 children with intractable constipation and fecal soiling underwent the antegrade continence enema procedure laparoscopically. All cases had full bowel preparation the day before surgery. This procedure was done through one 5-mm camera port and two 5-mm working ports in 8 cases, and using the camera port and only one additional 5-mm working port in 4 cases. The appendix was used in 5 cases and the cecum in 3 cases with the threeport technique while the appendix was used in all 4 cases with the two-port technique. The appendix or cecum was delivered extracorporeally through the 5-mm port site in the right lower quadrant. The mucocutaneous anastomosis was stented using a gastrostomy button. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2004, 12 children (10 male, 2 female) underwent a laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure at a median age of 10.5 years (range, 7-14 years). This procedure was easy to perform and no case required conversion to an open procedure. The wash-outs via the MIC-KEY gastrostomy button (MIC-KEY, Kimberly-Clark) were commenced at a median of 3.5 days (range, 1-5 days). Median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-5 days). This procedure was effective in completely resolving fecal incontinence in 9 cases and partially resolving it in 3 cases. There were no episodes of stomal stenosis, leakage, or herniation. However, one case required a revision of antegrade continence enema due to wound breakdown and leakage of irrigation fluid around the stoma. The median follow-up period was 15.5 months (range, 5-32 months). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic technique is a simple and effective approach in creating an antegrade continence enema. The use of a gastrostomy button can potentially reduce some of the complications commonly associated with an antegrade continence enema. We describe a procedure that incorporates the advantages of both laparoscopy and a button device, which is simple and easy to perform using just two ports.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Interval laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

BACKGROUND: Conservative management of advanced complicated appendicitis in children is becoming more common. Formation of an appendiceal mass or abscess may mitigate against urgent appendectomy during the acute stage, and conservative treatment followed by interval appendectomy has been advocated. We present our experience of interval laparoscopic appendectomy in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All children who were offered interval laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2000 and December 2004 were included. Retrospective case note analysis was performed and data collected included demographics, duration of symptoms, method of diagnosis, days of antibiotics, length of interval, operative time, length of hospital stay (conservative treatment and interval laparoscopic appendectomy), analgesia requirements, complications, and histology. RESULTS: Thirty-six children, median age 8 years (range, 1-15 years) diagnosed with appendiceal mass or abscess were offered interval laparoscopic appendectomy by two surgeons in our institution: one patient declined interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Median antibiotic treatment was 10 days (range, 3-23 days). Median length of stay for conservative treatment was 6 days (range, 1-27 days). Five children required percutaneous drainage. For the 35 children who had interval laparoscopic appendectomy, the median interval was 93 days (range, 34-156 days) and median operative time was 55 minutes (range, 25-120 minutes). Median length of stay for interval laparoscopic appendectomy was 1 day (range, 1-3 days). There were no complications following interval laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSION: Interval laparoscopic appendectomy can be safely performed in children, is associated with a short hospital stay and minimal morbidity, analgesia, and scarring following conservative management of appendiceal mass or abscess. Interval laparoscopic appendectomy eliminates the risk of recurrent appendicitis and serves to excise undiagnosed carcinoid tumors. In future it may be possible to perform interval laparoscopic appendectomy as a day-case procedure in selected patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic-assisted transanal endorectal coloanal anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease.

BACKGROUND: There has been a recent trend in the use of laparoscopic-assisted one-stage pull-through in the management of Hirschsprung's disease (HD). We describe our initial experience using laparoscopy with a transanal coloanal anastomosis as described by Rintala and Lindhal for HD. METHODS: Six children with biopsy-confirmed HD underwent laparoscopic-assisted pull-through using Rintala's transanal endorectal coloanal anastomosis. The procedure was done through one 5-mm camera port and two 5-mm working ports. The transition zone was identified by seromuscular biopsies obtained laparoscopically. The sigmoid colon and proximal rectum were mobilized laparoscopically. A transanal endorectal mucosal dissection and a coloanal anastomosis were done, using an absorbable monofilament 5/0 polyglyconate suture. RESULTS: Six children aged 4 weeks to 36 months underwent this procedure laparoscopically. Two cases had to be converted to an open procedure as a result of dense pelvic adhesions. The entire mobilization of the bowel as well as biopsy confirmation of the transition zone was done laparoscopically in all 6 cases. The median operative time was 135 minutes (range, 120-240 minutes). All 6 children tolerated full enteral feeds after 48 hours and the median hospital stay was 7 days (range, 6-10 days). There were no early postoperative complications. Two cases developed mild enterocolitis that resolved with conservative management. The overall functional outcome was good in all cases with no soiling, stool incontinence, or constipation at a median follow-up period of 12 months (range, 4-27 months). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted pull-through, apart from being cosmetically superior, permits obtaining biopsies as well as an adequate mobilization of the bowel. The transanal endorectal coloanal anastomosis technique is simple and easy to perform, with a minimal dissection which causes less damage to the internal sphincter and pelvic nerves.

Anal Canal↗

PubMed2004

YB-1 and CTCF differentially regulate the 5-HTT polymorphic intron 2 enhancer which predisposes to a variety of neurological disorders.

The serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene contains a variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) domain within intron 2 that is often associated with a number of neurological conditions, including affective disorders. The implications of this polymorphism are not yet understood, however, we have previously demonstrated that the 5-HTT VNTR is a transcriptional regulatory domain, and the allelic variation supports differential reporter gene expression in vivo and in vitro. The aim of this study was to identify transcription factors responsible for the regulation of this VNTR. Using a yeast one-hybrid screen, we found the transcription factor Y box binding protein 1 (YB-1) interacts with the 5-HTT VNTR. Consistent with this, we demonstrate in a reporter gene assay that the polymorphic VNTR domains differentially respond to exogenous YB-1 and that YB-1 will bind to the VNTR in vitro in a sequence-specific manner. Interestingly, the transcription factor CCTC-binding factor (CTCF), previously shown to interact with YB-1, interferes with the ability of the VNTR to support YB-1-directed reporter gene expression. In addition, CTCF blocks the binding of YB-1 to its DNA recognition sequences in vitro, thus providing a possible mechanism of regulation of YB-1 activation of the VNTR by CTCF. Therefore, we have identified YB-1 and CTCF as transcription factors responsible, at least in part, for modulation of VNTR function as a transcriptional regulatory domain. Our data suggest a novel mechanism that explains, in part, the ability of the distinct VNTR copy numbers to support differential reporter gene expression based on YB-1 binding sites.

Alleles↗