PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

June E Smith

Publications and source records attributed to June E Smith.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Graduates' perceptions of their clinical competencies in allergy and immunology: results of a survey.

PURPOSE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) have identified six areas of general competency. This study surveyed graduates of allergy and immunology training programs about their perceived clinical competency and the adequacy of their subspecialty training. METHOD: In August 2000 and May 2001, a questionnaire was mailed to 373 physicians who had completed a fellowship in allergy and immunology in the United States between 1995 and 2001. Physicians were asked to rate the perceived importance and adequacy of their training in, and their level of competency for, 57 general competencies and subspecialty-specific competencies and procedures. RESULTS: A total of 253 physicians responded (68%). All items in the six ACGME/ABMS general competencies had high ratings (>/= 90%) for perceived importance. One item in the practice-based learning area had low ratings for adequacy of training (57%) and intermediate for competency (75%). Two items in the system-based practice area had low ratings for training (65% and 67%) and intermediate for competency (86% and 88%). Generally, core specialty-specific items (allergic rhinitis, asthma, and urticaria) had high ratings (>/= 90%) for importance, training, and competency. Without exception, items with ratings of less than 70% for adequacy of training also had ratings of less than 90% for competency. CONCLUSION: The general competencies were considered important, but training in system-based practice and practice-based learning may be deficient. Although self-perceived competency in core areas of allergy and immunology was high, weaknesses in training and self-perceived competency in selected areas were identified.

Adult↗

Analysis of differences in entry-level RN practice by educational preparation.

The National Council of State Boards of Nursing performs a practice (or job) analysis every 3 years linking the NCLEX-RN to practice through assessment of current RN job tasks. Although the primary purpose of the practice analyses is validation of the examination, data also may be used to assess for differences in practice by subsets of nurses. A secondary analysis of the 1999 RN Practice Analysis was performed to explore any divergence in practice attributable to educational preparation. The average frequencies of performance of 189 nursing activities were computed separately for graduates of associate degree (ADN) and baccalaureate degree (BSN) nursing programs and compared. Results demonstrated a .98 Pearson r correlation between the averages of the two groups. Both groups performed routine nursing care activities with the greatest frequencies and demonstrated more complex or advanced skills, such as teaching and managing care, at similar lower rates. Differences in the averages between the two groups were negligible. For 144 (76%) of the activities, differences were less than .25 on a scale of 0 to 5.

Education, Nursing, Associate↗

Exploring the efficacy of continuing education mandates.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the link between mandatory continuing education (CE) for relicensure and the development of professional competence. BACKGROUND DATA: Boards of nursing protect the public by establishing requirements for safe entry-level practice and assessing ongoing nursing competence. Some boards have mandated accumulation of CE hours as a means of assuring continued competence. The use of CE for this purpose has been controversial because no link had been established between CE and nurse competencies. METHODS: A survey was sent to 4000 randomly selected nursing subjects: 2000 licensed practical or vocational nurses (LPN/VNs) and 2000 registered nurses (RNs). RESULTS: Nurses perceived that work experience, their basic professional education, and mentors and preceptors were stronger contributors to their professional development than CE. Nurses mandated to collect CE hours did not experience more growth in their professional abilities nor did they accumulate more total hours of CE than those without such a mandate. Those with mandates did, however, attend more hours of CE that were unrelated to their work or interest, and were more likely to attend CE by correspondence. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses attend CE classes whether they are mandated to do so or not.

Education, Nursing, Continuing↗