PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

June-Won Cheong

Publications and source records attributed to June-Won Cheong.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Age- and sex-adjusted genomic differences between Korean and Beat AML cohorts.

Genomic profiling plays a central role in risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yet the clinical implications of population-specific genomic architectures remain incompletely defined. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study of 603 adults with newly diagnosed AML in Korea, integrating targeted sequencing of 83 recurrently mutated genes with comprehensive clinical annotation across treatment intensities, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). For contextual comparison, genomic profiles were evaluated against the Beat AML cohort. The overall genomic landscape was broadly conserved, supporting shared core disease biology across populations. However, RUNX1::RUNX1T1, CEBPA, GATA2, KIT, and DDX41 mutations were more frequent in the Korean cohort, whereas FLT3 and NPM1 mutations were less common. These differences translated into a distinct distribution of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 risk categories, with implications for therapeutic stratification. Notably, most DDX41 alterations were germline (3.2%), highlighting the need for systematic germline evaluation with implications for genetic counseling and donor selection. Although unadjusted overall survival appeared longer in the Korean cohort, this difference was not significant after adjustment for key clinical variables. These findings indicate that population-specific genomic distributions reshape the clinical application of risk stratification and support population-aware precision medicine strategies in AML.

Journal Article

Baseline Plasma Cell-Free and Circulating Tumor DNA Across Lymphoma Subtypes and Its Prognostic Impact in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis enables real‑time assessment of the tumor burden and genomic complexity in lymphomas. However, real‑world evidence across lymphoma subtypes is limited. METHODS: We analyzed cell‑free DNA (cfDNA) and ctDNA data from 336 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2022 and evaluated their prognostic impact in diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RESULTS: We detected somatic alterations in 248 of 336 patients (73.8%). DLBCL and follicular lymphoma showed the highest variant prevalences and ctDNA burdens. Epigenetic regulators, including KMT2D, CREBBP, TET2, and HIST1H1E, constituted the dominant class of genes with recurrent alterations. Plasma variant profiles closely mirrored publicly available, tissue‑based next-generation sequencing datasets. The baseline ctDNA burden correlated with adverse clinical features, and ctDNA positivity was associated with failure to achieve complete remission. In DLBCL, elevated cfDNA (top quartile) and a high International Prognostic Index (IPI) were independently associated with shorter overall and progression‑free survival. However, the total variant count per patient was not significantly associated with survival after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline plasma cfDNA and ctDNA assessments are feasible in routine practice and recapitulate tissue-variant landscapes. Elevated cfDNA concentrations-but not the total variant count-were independently associated with survival in DLBCL, providing prognostic information beyond the IPI and supporting integration of plasma-based biomarkers into multiparameter risk models. Gene‑level ctDNA associations should be regarded as exploratory and hypothesis‑generating.

Cell-free DNA