PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Junji Shiraishi

Publications and source records attributed to Junji Shiraishi.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Computer-aided diagnosis for improved detection of lung nodules by use of posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiographs.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We developed a computerized scheme for detection of lung nodules in the lateral views of chest radiographs, in order to improve the overall performance in combination with the computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) scheme for posterior-anterior (PA) views. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 106 pairs of PA and lateral views of chest radiographs (122 lung nodules) for development of the CAD scheme. In the CAD scheme for lateral views, initial candidates of lung nodules were identified by use of a nodule enhancement filter based on the edge gradients. Thirty-four image features extracted from the original and the nodule-enhanced images were used for the rule-based scheme and for artificial neural networks (ANNs) for removal of some false-positive candidates. The computer performance was evaluated with a leave-one-case-out test method for ANNs. For PA views, we used the existing CAD scheme, which was trained with one-half of 924 chest images and then tested with the remaining images. RESULTS: When the CAD scheme was applied only to PA views, the sensitivity in the detection of lung nodules was 70.5%, with 4.9 false positives per image. Although the performance of the computerized scheme for lateral views was relatively low (60.7% sensitivity with 1.7 false positives per image), the overall sensitivity (86.9%) was improved (6.6 false positives per two views), because 20 (16.4%) of the 122 nodules were detected only on lateral views. CONCLUSIONS: The CAD scheme by use of lateral-view images has the potential to improve the overall performance for detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs when combined with a conventional CAD scheme for standard PA views.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed2006

Computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and classification of lung cancers on chest radiographs ROC analysis of radiologists' performance.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) scheme on radiologist performance in the detection of lung cancers on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combined two independent CAD schemes for the detection and classification of lung nodules into one new CAD scheme by use of a database of 150 chest images, including 108 cases with solitary pulmonary nodules and 42 cases without nodules. For the observer study, we selected 48 chest images, including 24 lung cancers, 12 benign nodules, and 12 cases without nodules, from the database to investigate radiologist performance in the detection of lung cancers. Nine radiologists participated in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study in which cases were interpreted first without and then with computer output, which indicated locations of possible lung nodules, together with a five-color scale illustrating the computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy of the detected nodules. RESULTS: Performance of the CAD scheme indicated that sensitivity in detecting lung nodules was 80.6%, with 1.2 false-positive results per image, and sensitivity and specificity for classification of nodules by use of the same database for training and testing the CAD scheme were 87.7% and 66.7%, respectively. Average area under the ROC curve value for detection of lung cancers improved significantly (P = .008) from without (0.724) to with CAD (0.778). CONCLUSION: This type of CAD scheme, which includes two functions, namely detection and classification, can improve radiologist accuracy in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2006

Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs: localized search method based on anatomical classification.

We developed an advanced computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) scheme for the detection of various types of lung nodules on chest radiographs intended for implementation in clinical situations. We used 924 digitized chest images (992 noncalcified nodules) which had a 500 x 500 matrix size with a 1024 gray scale. The images were divided randomly into two sets which were used for training and testing of the computerized scheme. In this scheme, the lung field was first segmented by use of a ribcage detection technique, and then a large search area (448 x 448 matrix size) within the chest image was automatically determined by taking into account the locations of a midline and a top edge of the segmented ribcage. In order to detect lung nodule candidates based on a localized search method, we divided the entire search area into 7 x 7 regions of interest (ROIs: 64 x 64 matrix size). In the next step, each ROI was classified anatomically into apical, peripheral, hilar, and diaphragm/heart regions by use of its image features. Identification of lung nodule candidates and extraction of image features were applied for each localized region (128 x 128 matrix size), each having its central part (64 x 64 matrix size) located at a position corresponding to a ROI that was classified anatomically in the previous step. Initial candidates were identified by use of the nodule-enhanced image obtained with the average radial-gradient filtering technique, in which the filter size was varied adaptively depending on the location and the anatomical classification of the ROI. We extracted 57 image features from the original and nodule-enhanced images based on geometric, gray-level, background structure, and edge-gradient features. In addition, 14 image features were obtained from the corresponding locations in the contralateral subtraction image. A total of 71 image features were employed for three sequential artificial neural networks (ANNs) in order to reduce the number of false-positive candidates. All parameters for ANNs, i.e., the number of iterations, slope of sigmoid functions, learning rate, and threshold values for removing the false positives, were determined automatically by use of a bootstrap technique with training cases. We employed four different combinations of training and test image data sets which was selected randomly from the 924 cases. By use of our localized search method based on anatomical classification, the average sensitivity was increased to 92.5% with 59.3 false positives per image at the level of initial detection for four different sets of test cases, whereas our previous technique achieved an 82.8% of sensitivity with 56.8 false positives per image. The computer performance in the final step obtained from four different data sets indicated that the average sensitivity in detecting lung nodules was 70.1% with 5.0 false positives per image for testing cases and 70.4% sensitivity with 4.2 false positives per image for training cases. The advanced CAD scheme involving the localized search method with anatomical classification provided improved detection of pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs for 924 lung nodule cases.

Databases, Factual↗
PubMed2006

Experimental determination of subjective similarity for pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: observer study results.

Presentation of images of lesions similar to that of an unknown lesion might be useful to radiologists in distinguishing between benign and malignant clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Investigators have been developing computerized schemes to select similar images from large databases. However, whether selected images are really similar in appearance is not examined for most of the schemes. In order to retrieve images that are useful to radiologists, the selected images must be similar from radiologists' diagnostic points of view. Therefore, in this study, the data of radiologists' subjective similarity for pairs of clustered microcalcification images were obtained from a number of observers, and the intra- and inter-observer variations and the intergroup correlations were determined to investigate whether reliable similarity ratings by human observers can be determined. Nineteen images of clustered microcalcifications, each of which was paired with six other images, were selected for the observer study. Thus, subjective similarity ratings for 114 pairs of clustered microcalcifications were determined by each observer. Thirteen breast, ten general, and ten nonradiologists participated in the observer study; some of them completed the study multiple times. Although the intraobserver variations for the individual readings and the interobserver variations for pairs of observers were not small, the interobserver agreements were improved by taking the average of readings by the same observers. When the similarity ratings by a number of observers were averaged among the groups of breast, general, and nonradiologists, the mean differences of the ratings between the groups decreased, and good concordance correlations (0.846, 0.817, and 0.785) between the groups were obtained. The result indicates that reliable similarity ratings can be determined by use of this method, and the average similarity ratings by breast radiologists can be considered meaningful and useful for the development and evaluation of a computerized scheme for selection of similar images.

Breast Diseases↗
PubMed2005

False-positive reduction in computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detecting nodules in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: We developed a technique that uses a multiple massive-training artificial neural network (multi-MTANN) to reduce the number of false-positive results in a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) scheme for detecting nodules in chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our database consisted of 91 solitary pulmonary nodules, including 64 malignant nodules and 27 benign nodules, in 91 chest radiographs. With our current CAD scheme based on a difference-image technique and linear discriminant analysis, we achieved a sensitivity of 82.4%, with 4.5 false positives per image. We developed the multi-MTANN for further reduction of the false positive rate. An MTANN is a highly nonlinear filter that can be trained with input images and corresponding teaching images. To reduce the effects of background levels in chest radiographs, we applied a background-trend-correction technique, followed by contrast normalization, to the input images for the MTANN. For enhancement of nodules, the teaching image was designed to contain the distribution for a "likelihood of being a nodule." Six MTANNs in the multi-MTANN were trained by using typical nodules and six different types of non-nodules (false positives). RESULTS: Use of the trained multi-MTANN eliminated 68.3% of false-positive findings with a reduction of one true-positive result. The false-positive rate of our original CAD scheme was improved from 4.5 to 1.4 false positives per image, at an overall sensitivity of 81.3%. CONCLUSION: Use of a multi-MTANN substantially reduced the false-positive rate of our CAD scheme for lung nodule detection on chest radiographs, while maintaining a level of sensitivity.

False Positive Reactions↗
PubMed2005

Computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic CT.

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) provides a computerized diagnostic result as a "second opinion" to assist radiologists in the diagnosis of various diseases by use of medical images. CAD has become a practical clinical approach in diagnostic radiology, although, at present, primarily in the area of detection of breast cancer in mammograms. Currently, a large research effort has been devoted to the detection and classification of various lung diseases in thoracic computed tomography (CT) images. We describe in this article the current status of the development of CAD schemes in thoracic CT, including nodule detection, distinction between benign and malignant nodules, and detection, characterization, and differential diagnosis of diffuse lung disease. Observer performance studies indicate that these CAD schemes would be useful in clinical practice by providing radiologists with computer output as a "second opinion."

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: preliminary results.

We investigated a psychophysical similarity measure for selection of images similar to those of unknown masses on mammograms, which may assist radiologists in the distinction between benign and malignant masses. Sixty pairs of masses were selected from 1445 mass images prepared for this study, which were obtained from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography by the University of South Florida. Five radiologists provided subjective similarity ratings for these 60 pairs of masses based on the overall impression for diagnosis. Radiologists' subjective ratings were marked on a continuous rating scale and quantified between 0 and 1, which correspond to pairs not similar at all and pairs almost identical, respectively. By use of the subjective ratings as "gold standard," similarity measures based on the Euclidean distance between pairs in feature space and the psychophysical measure were determined. For determination of the psychophysical similarity measure, an artificial neural network (ANN) was employed to learn the relationship between radiologists' average subjective similarity ratings and computer-extracted image features. To evaluate the usefulness of the similarity measures, the agreement with the radiologists' subjective similarity ratings was assessed in terms of correlation coefficients between the average subjective ratings and the similarity measures. A commonly used similarity measure based on the Euclidean distance was moderately correlated (r=0.644) with the radiologists' average subjective ratings, whereas the psychophysical measure by use of the ANN was highly correlated (r=0.798). The preliminary result indicates that a psychophysical similarity measure would be useful in the selection of images similar to those of unknown masses on mammograms.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate whether a difference-image computer-aided detection (CAD) scheme can help radiologists detect peripheral lung cancers missed at low-dose computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed patient and observer consent were obtained. Seventeen patients (eight men and nine women; mean age, 60 years) with a missed peripheral lung cancer and 10 control subjects (five men and five women; mean age, 63 years) without cancer at low-dose CT were included in an observer study. Fourteen radiologists were divided into two groups on the basis of different image display formats: Six radiologists (group 1) reviewed CT scans with a multiformat display, and eight radiologists (group 2) reviewed images with a "stacked" cine-mode display. The radiologists, first without and then with the CAD scheme, indicated their confidence level regarding the presence (or absence) of cancer and the most likely position of a lesion on each CT scan. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated without and with localization to evaluate the observers' performance. RESULTS: With the CAD scheme, the average area under the ROC curve improved from 0.763 to 0.854 for all radiologists (P = .002), from 0.757 to 0.862 for group 1 (P = .04), and from 0.768 to 0.848 for group 2 (P = .01). The average sensitivity in the detection of 17 cancers improved from 52% (124 of 238 observations) to 68% (163 of 238 observations) for all radiologists (P < .001), from 49% (50 of 102 observations) to 71% (72 of 102 observations) for group 1 (P = .02), and from 54% (74 of 136 observations) to 67% (91 of 136 observations) for group 2 (P = .006). The localization ROC curve also improved. CONCLUSION: Lung cancers missed at low-dose CT were very difficult to detect, even in an observer study. The use of CAD, however, can improve radiologists' performance in the detection of these subtle cancers.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Computerized scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography images for lung cancer screening.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A computerized scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography images for lung cancer screening was developed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our scheme is based on a difference-image technique for enhancing the lung nodules and suppressing the majority of background normal structures. The difference image for each computed tomography image was obtained by subtracting the nodule-suppressed image processed with a ring average filter from the nodule-enhanced image with a matched filter. The initial nodule candidates were identified by applying a multiple-gray level thresholding technique to the difference image, where most nodules were well enhanced. A number of false-positives were removed first in entire lung regions and second in divided lung regions by use of the two rule-based schemes on the localized image features related to morphology and gray levels. Some of the remaining false-positives were eliminated by use of a multiple massive training artificial neural network trained for reduction of various types of false-positives. This computerized scheme was applied to a confirmed cancer database of 106 low-dose computed tomography scans with 109 cancer lesions for 73 patients obtained from a lung cancer screening program in Nagano, Japan. RESULTS: This computed-aided diagnosis scheme provided a sensitivity of 83% (91/109) for all cancers with 5.8 false-positives per scan, which included 84% (32/38) for missed cancers with 5.9 false-positives per scan. CONCLUSION: This computerized scheme may be useful for assisting radiologists in detecting lung cancers on low-dose computed tomography images for lung cancer screening.

False Positive Reactions↗
PubMed2004

Effect of temporal subtraction images on radiologists' detection of lung cancer on CT: results of the observer performance study with use of film computed tomography images.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of temporal subtraction images on the radiologists' detection of early primary lung cancer in computed tomography (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen cases with primary lung cancer and 16 normal cases were used for this study from a database of low-dose CT images, which were obtained from a lung cancer screening program in Nagano, Japan. Images were obtained with a single-detector helical CT scanner using 10 mm collimation and 2:1 pitch. Each case had both previous and current CT scans. Temporal subtraction images were obtained by subtracting the warped previous images from the current images. Seven radiologists, including four attendings and three residents, provided their confidence levels for the presence or absence of lung cancers with use of film CT images without and with temporal subtraction images. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare their performance without and with temporal subtraction images. RESULTS: The mean Az values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of seven observers without and with temporal subtraction images were 0.868 and 0.930, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly improved by using temporal subtraction images (P = .007). Temporal subtraction images were especially useful when a nodule was present near the pulmonary hilum, where radiologists tended to overlook it. CONCLUSION: The temporal subtraction technique can significantly improve the sensitivity and specificity for detection of lung cancer on CT scans.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: results of a simulation test with actual clinical cases.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) scheme with use of consecutive clinical cases and its effect on radiologists with an observer test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial neural networks were designed to distinguish among 11 interstitial lung diseases on the basis of 26 inputs (16 radiologic findings, 10 clinical parameters). Chest radiographs of 96 consecutive cases with interstitial lung disease were used. Five radiologists independently rated their radiologic findings on the 96 chest radiographs. Based on their ratings of radiologic findings and clinical parameters obtained from the hospital information system, the output values indicating the likelihood of each of the 11 interstitial lung diseases were determined. Subsequently, 30 cases were selected from these 96 cases for an observer test. Five radiologists marked their confidence levels for diagnosis of 11 possible diseases in each case without and with ANN output. The performance of ANNs and radiologists was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis based on their outputs and on confidence levels, respectively. RESULTS; The average Az value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) indicating ANN performance for the 96 consecutive cases was 0.85 +/- 0.03. The average Az values indicating radiologists' performance without and with ANN outputs were 0.81 +/- 0.11 and 0.87 +/- 0.06, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was improved significantly when radiologists read chest radiographs with ANN outputs (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Artificial neural networks for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease may be useful in clinical situations, and radiologists may be able to utilize the ANN output to their advantage in the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease on chest radiographs.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology.

Chest radiography is still a useful examination in various situations, although CT has become a modality of choice as a diagnostic examination in many cases. Current computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes for chest radiographs include nodule detection, interstitial disease detection, temporal subtraction, differential diagnosis of interstitial disease, and distinction between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules. All of these schemes are demonstrated as providing potentially useful tools for radiologists when the output of these schemes is used as a "second opinion." There are some commercially available products for these schemes and more are expected to be available in the near future. The current status of CAD for CT is also discussed briefly in this article.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed2004

Radiologists' performance for differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme can assist radiologists in distinguishing small benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT (HRCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed an automated computerized scheme for determining the likelihood of malignancy of lung nodules on multiple HRCT slices; the likelihood estimate was obtained from various objective features of the nodules using linear discriminant analysis. The data set used in this observer study consisted of 28 primary lung cancers (6-20 mm) and 28 benign nodules. Cancer cases included nodules with pure ground-glass opacity, mixed ground-glass opacity, and solid opacity. Benign nodules were selected by matching their size and pattern to the malignant nodules. Consecutive region-of-interest images for each nodule on HRCT were displayed for interpretation in stacked mode on a cathode ray tube monitor. The images were presented to 16 radiologists-first without and then with the computer output-who were asked to indicate their confidence level regarding the malignancy of a nodule. Performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (Az value) of the CAD scheme alone was 0.831 for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. The average Az value for radiologists was improved with the aid of the CAD scheme from 0.785 to 0.853 by a statistically significant level (p = 0.016). The radiologists' diagnostic performance with the CAD scheme was more accurate than that of the CAD scheme alone (p < 0.05) and also that of radiologists alone. CONCLUSION: CAD has the potential to improve radiologists' diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing small benign nodules from malignant ones on HRCT.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed2003

Effect of high sensitivity in a computerized scheme for detecting extremely subtle solitary pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: observer performance study.

RATIONALES AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effect of a high sensitivity in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for detecting lung nodules in chest radiographs when extremely subtle cases were presented to radiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The chest radiographs used in this study consisted of 36 normal images and 54 abnormals containing solitary lung nodules, of which 25 were extremely subtle and 29 were very subtle. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for detecting lung nodules was performed without and with CAD. The levels of CAD output were simulated with a hypothetical ideal performance of 100% sensitivity, but with three or four false positives per image. Six radiologists participated in an observer study in which cases were interpreted first without and then with the use of CAD. RESULTS: The average A(z) values for radiologists without and with CAD were 0.682 and 0.808, respectively. The performance of radiologists was improved significantly when high sensitivity was used (P = .0003). However, the radiologists were not able to recognize some extremely subtle nodules (5 of 54 nodules by all radiologists), even with the correct CAD output; these nodules were then considered as non-actionable. None of 306 computer-false positives was incorrectly regarded as a nodule by all radiologists, but 63 false positives were incorrectly identified by one or more radiologists. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of radiologists in the detection of some extremely subtle solitary pulmonary nodules can be improved significantly when the sensitivity of a CAD scheme can be made to be at an extremely high level. However, all of the six radiologists failed to identify some nodules (about 10%), even with the correct output of the CAD.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Quantitative computerized analysis of diffuse lung disease in high-resolution computed tomography.

An automated computerized scheme has been developed for the detection and characterization of diffuse lung diseases on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images. Our database consisted of 315 HRCT images selected from 105 patients, which included normal and abnormal slices related to six different patterns, i.e., ground-glass opacities, reticular and linear opacities, nodular opacities, honeycombing, emphysematous change, and consolidation. The areas that included specific diffuse patterns in 315 HRCT images were marked by three radiologists independently on the CRT monitor in the same manner as they commonly describe in their radiologic reports. The areas with a specific pattern, which three radiologists marked independently and consistently as the same patterns, were used as "gold standard" for specific abnormal opacities in this study. The lungs were first segmented from the background in each slice by use of a morphological filter and a thresholding technique, and then divided into many contiguous regions of interest (ROIs) with a 32x32 matrix. Six physical measures which were determined in each ROI included the mean and the standard deviation of the CT value, air density components, nodular components, line components, and multilocular components. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were employed for distinguishing between seven different patterns which included normals and six patterns associated with diffuse lung disease. The sensitivity of this computerized method for a detection of the six abnormal patterns in each ROI was 99.2% (122/123) for ground-glass opacities, 100% (15/15) for reticular and linear opacities, 88.0% (132/150) for nodular opacities, 100% (98/98) for honeycombing, 95.8% (369/385) for emphysematous change, and 100% (43/43) for consolidation. The specificity in detecting a normal ROI was 88.1% (940/1067). This computerized method may be useful in assisting radiologists in their assessment of diffuse lung disease in HRCT images.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2003

Investigation of new psychophysical measures for evaluation of similar images on thoracic computed tomography for distinction between benign and malignant nodules.

We have been developing a computerized scheme to assist radiologists in improving the diagnostic accuracy for lung cancers on low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans by use of similar images for malignant nodules and benign nodules. A database of 415 LDCT scans including 73 cases with 76 confirmed cancers and 342 cases with 413 confirmed benign nodules was first collected in an LDCT screening program for early detection of lung cancers in Nagano, Japan. An observer study by use of receiver operating characteristics analysis was first conducted with five radiologists to demonstrate that presenting similar images for malignant nodules and benign nodules can significantly improve radiologists' performance in the diagnosis of unknown nodules. Another observer study was then conducted for obtaining reliable data on subjective similarity ratings by 10 radiologists. Based on the subjective similarity ratings, three important features were selected from a number of nodule features, and four different techniques for the determination of similarity measures, namely, a feature-based technique, a pixel-value-difference based technique, a cross-correlation-based technique, and a neural-network-based technique, were investigated and evaluated in terms of the correlation coefficient with the subjective similarity ratings. The experimental results in this study indicated that the neural-network-based technique can provide a reliable psychophysical similarity measure which is comparable to the subjective similarity ratings for a single radiologist when evaluated by use of correlation with the average similarity ratings for the other nine radiologists.

Humans↗