PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Junsu Ko

Publications and source records attributed to Junsu Ko.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

STRUMP-I: Structure-based machine learning approach to pMHC-I binding prediction using force field energy features.

The adaptive immune system monitors cellular integrity by recognizing short peptides from intracellular proteins presented on Major Histocompatibility Complex class I (MHC-I) molecules, collectively termed peptide-MHC complexes (pMHC), enabling detection of foreign or mutated proteins. With the rising importance of immunotherapies targeting neoantigens in cancers, the ability to accurately predict which peptides will bind to the diverse population of MHC alleles is critically important. Current computational methods for pMHC-I prediction fall broadly into sequence-based methods, which rely heavily on large training datasets, and structure-based methods that leverage structural modeling and energetics of pMHC binding. While sequence-based methods have been popularly used, their performance is dependent on the size and quality of training data. On the other hands, while structure-based approaches can generalize better across diverse MHC alleles, they traditionally depend on identifying a single global minimum energy conformation, an assumption that often fails due to the inherent binding promiscuity of MHC-I molecules. To address these limitations, we developed a STRUMP-I (STRUcture-based pMHC Prediction (for class I)), a novel pMHC binding prediction tool that directly leverages a broad set of force-field-derived energy terms as machine-learning features. STRUMP-I achieves performance comparable to state-of-the-art sequence-based models while significantly outperforming them on MHC alleles with limited representation in training data. Furthermore, STRUMP-I demonstrates strong synergy when integrated with sequence-based methods, notably enhancing prediction precision. The robustness and generalizability of STRUMP-I were confirmed by evaluating its predictive performance on independent, previously unseen datasets, including an experimentally validated cancer neoantigen dataset. This combined approach advances our capability to reliably identify clinically relevant neoantigen targets. The source code and trained models are available at https://github.com/yoonjoolab/STRUMP-I.

energy optimization↗

A protein domain interaction interface database: InterPare.

BACKGROUND: Most proteins function by interacting with other molecules. Their interaction interfaces are highly conserved throughout evolution to avoid undesirable interactions that lead to fatal disorders in cells. Rational drug discovery includes computational methods to identify the interaction sites of lead compounds to the target molecules. Identifying and classifying protein interaction interfaces on a large scale can help researchers discover drug targets more efficiently. DESCRIPTION: We introduce a large-scale protein domain interaction interface database called InterPare http://interpare.net. It contains both inter-chain (between chains) interfaces and intra-chain (within chain) interfaces. InterPare uses three methods to detect interfaces: 1) the geometric distance method for checking the distance between atoms that belong to different domains, 2) Accessible Surface Area (ASA), a method for detecting the buried region of a protein that is detached from a solvent when forming multimers or complexes, and 3) the Voronoi diagram, a computational geometry method that uses a mathematical definition of interface regions. InterPare includes visualization tools to display protein interior, surface, and interaction interfaces. It also provides statistics such as the amino acid propensities of queried protein according to its interior, surface, and interface region. The atom coordinates that belong to interface, surface, and interior regions can be downloaded from the website. CONCLUSION: InterPare is an open and public database server for protein interaction interface information. It contains the large-scale interface data for proteins whose 3D-structures are known. As of November 2004, there were 10,583 (Geometric distance), 10,431 (ASA), and 11,010 (Voronoi diagram) entries in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) containing interfaces, according to the above three methods. In the case of the geometric distance method, there are 31,620 inter-chain domain-domain interaction interfaces and 12,758 intra-chain domain-domain interfaces.

Computers, Molecular↗