Biomedical subjects

Justin Sang Ko

Publications and source records attributed to Justin Sang Ko.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

The changes in coagulation profile and epidural catheter safety for living liver donors: a report on 6 years of our experience.

The use of epidural catheters has been a subject of active debate in living liver donors because of the possible postoperative coagulation derangement and the subsequent risk of epidural hematoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of epidural catheters in relation to the changes in coagulation profile based on a review of previously published literature and the results of our 360 donors. In both the literature and in our cases, platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in cases of heparin administration showed significant changes (P < 0.05), especially after right lobectomy. Platelet count reached its nadir on postoperative day (POD) 2-3, while PT and aPTT reached their peaks on POD 1-2 and at the end of the operation, respectively. In our donors, the ranges of platelet count, PT, and aPTT for the first 3 PODs were 54-359 x10/microL, 0.99-2.38 international normalized ratio (INR), and 25.9-300 seconds, respectively, and of note, 5 donors (1.4%) had a platelet count of <80 x 10/microL and 9 donors (2.5%) had a PT of >2.0 INR. Epidural catheterizations were performed in 242 donors, and the catheters were removed on POD 3-4 in 177 donors (73.1%). Mean (range) of platelet count, PT, and aPTT on the day of catheter removal were 168.4 +/- 42.9 (82-307) x 10/microL, 1.33 +/- 0.18 (0.99-1.93) INR, and 40.9 +/- 4.8 (32.0-70.6) seconds, respectively. No epidural hematoma was observed in this study. In conclusion, the discreet use of epidural catheters in live liver donors, in spite of postoperative coagulation derangements, appears to be safe regardless of the type of hepatectomy performed.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Differences of perioperative liver function, transfusion, and complications according to the type of hepatectomy in living donors.

Numerous living donor hepatectomy are being performed safely. However, donors are still exposed to various complications including hepatic failure. We examined the donor's potential risk and morbidity depending on the type of hepatectomy: left lateral segmentectomy (group LLS, n = 30), left lobectomy (group LL, n = 15), and right lobectomy (group RL, n = 128). The charts and computerized hospital data of 173 donors from March 2000 to September 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed liver function tests (LFT), RBC transfusion, and complications. Although the graft weight was greatest, and surgical and anesthetic times were longest in the group RL, there were no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay, RBC transfusion, and major complications among the groups. However, minor complications were significantly higher in group RL than group LLS. Postoperative prothrombin time and total bilirubin were significantly higher in the group RL than the other groups (P < 0.05). Living donor hepatectomy is relatively safe, and it is evidenced by rapid recovery of LFT and low occurrence of major complications. However, noticeable depression of LFT and frequent minor complications occur after hepatectomy, especially RL.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

A korean predictive model for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common and distressing complications after surgery. An identification of risk factors associated with PONV would make it easier to select specific patients for effective antiemetic therapy. We designed a case-controlled study to identify the risk factors for PONV in 5,272 surgical patients. At postoperative 2 and 24 hr, patients were visited and interviewed on the presence and severity of PONV. Thirty nine percent of patients experienced one or more episodes of nausea or vomiting. Five risk factors were highly predictive of PONV: 1) female, 2) history of previous PONV or motion sickness, 3) duration of anesthesia more than 1 hour, 4) non-smoking status, and 5) use of opioid in the form of patient controlled analgesia (PCA), in the order of relevance. The formula to calculate the probability of PONV using the multiple regression analysis was as follows: P (probability of PONV)=1/1+e(-Z), Z=-1.885+0.894 (gender)+0.661 (history)+0.584 (duration of anesthesia)+0.196 (smoking status)+0.186 (use of PCA-based opioid) where gender: female=1, male=0; history of previous PONV or motion sickness: yes=1, no=0; duration of anesthesia:more than 1 hr=1, less than or 1 hr=0; smoking status: no=1, yes=0; use of PCA-based opioid: yes=1, no=0.

Anesthesia↗