Erythromycin, motilin, and gastroparesis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Diabetic Neuropathies↗
Biomedical subjects
K A Calis
Publications and source records attributed to K A Calis.
Transdermally administered fentanyl for pain management.
The physicochemical properties, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, serum concentrations and clinical effects, adverse effects and contraindications, and dosage of transdermally administered fentanyl are described, and clinical studies evaluating the use of a transdermal fentanyl system in the treatment of postoperative pain and chronic cancer-associated pain are reviewed. After application of a transdermal system, fentanyl is absorbed into the skin beneath the patch, where a depot forms in the upper skin layers. Plasma fentanyl concentrations are barely detectable for about two hours after patch placement. Eight to 12 hours after patch placement, concentrations approximate those achieved with equivalent i.v. doses of fentanyl. Some studies comparing transdermally administered fentanyl with placebo in postoperative patients showed that the patients who received fentanyl required fewer supplementary analgesics and reported less pain than the patients who received placebo. However, the overall efficacy and safety of the transdermal fentanyl system for the treatment of postoperative pain have not been adequately evaluated. Studies of cancer patients showed that transdermally administered fentanyl appears to be effective in the management of chronic, cancer-related pain. Dermatological reactions to the fentanyl patch are generally transient and mild. Other adverse effects are those that are commonly associated with narcotic analgesics. The 25-micrograms/hr patch should be used for initial treatment in patients not previously treated with narcotics. The dosage may be gradually increased until effective analgesia is obtained. Although experience with the product is limited, transdermally administered fentanyl appears to be effective for the long-term management of cancer-related pain.
Administration, Cutaneous↗
Recombinant interleukin-2: a biological response modifier.
The chemical properties, pharmacology, immunology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of recombinant interleukin-2 are reviewed. Recombinant interleukin-2 is an immunomodulating agent that stimulates the proliferation, activation, and differentiation of T and B cells, natural killer cells, and thymocytes. Two recombinant interleukin-2 products, aldesleukin and teceleukin, have been extensively studied. Most clinical experience with recombinant interleukin-2 has involved the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and colorectal cancer with a National Cancer Institute protocol. Patients with renal cell cancer and melanoma, who historically respond poorly to conventional therapy, have responded to therapy with recombinant interleukin-2. Recombinant interleukin-2 has been administered alone and in combination with lymphokine-activated killer cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and interferons alfa and beta. In addition, the effect of dosage, administration rate, dosage schedule, route of administration, and cyclophosphamide pretreatment have been investigated. The adverse effects of recombinant interleukin-2 are generally reversible but are frequently severe and dose-related. Dose-limiting adverse effects include hypotension, edema, and renal dysfunction. Since hemodynamic monitoring and supportive care are essential, recombinant interleukin-2 should be administered in a critical-care setting by trained personnel. Recombinant interleukin-2 represents an advance in the therapy of renal cell cancer and melanoma and offers a new approach to the treatment of other refractory or recurrent malignancies.
Cell Division↗
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
The epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and clinical course of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are described and the role of pharmacotherapy in the management of this disorder is discussed. ADHD is a behavioral disorder of unknown etiology characterized by inattention, impulsiveness, and hyperactivity. The behavior, which may be manifest at home, at school, or in social situations, is generally worse in settings requiring sustained attention; as a result, academic underachievement is frequently an associated problem. Although the onset usually occurs before the age of four years, ADHD is most commonly diagnosed when the child enters school. It is up to six times more common in boys than in girls. Nearly one third of all children with ADHD continue to show symptoms of the disorder in adulthood. While many questions about the pathophysiology of ADHD remain unanswered and a cure has not yet been found, pharmacotherapy can effectively control the symptoms of the disorder in most patients. Three psychostimulant medications--dextroamphetamine sulfate, methylphenidate hydrochloride, and pemoline--are considered the drugs of first choice for management of the behavioral manifestations of ADHD. Dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate are equally effective in improving the symptoms of ADHD. Pemoline, a newer agent, may be tried in patients who cannot tolerate or do not respond to these two first-line agents. Common adverse effects associated with stimulant medications include anorexia, insomnia, stomach pain, and weight loss; these are generally transient and decrease with time. Imipramine hydrochloride and desipramine hydrochloride are less effective and may produce more serious adverse effects than the psychostimulants and are therefore considered second-line agents for the treatment of ADHD. Dextroamphetamine sulfate, methylphenidate hydrochloride, and pemoline have been shown to effectively control the behavioral symptoms of ADHD. For maximum impact, pharmacotherapy should be accompanied by behavioral, educational, and psychosocial intervention.
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗
Sublingual use of benzodiazepines.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Administration, Oral↗
Development of a questionnaire for detecting potential adverse drug reactions.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a comprehensive list of symptoms categorized by body system as part of a questionnaire for detecting potential adverse drug reactions. DATA SOURCES: A preliminary list of symptoms in lay terminology was extracted from the "Side Effects" section of all drug monographs contained in the United States Pharmacopeia Dispensing Information (USP DI) computerized database (Volume II, Advice for the Patient) using natural language processing software. The list was sorted alphabetically and duplicate terms were eliminated. Symptoms were then categorized by body system or anatomic region. A preferred term for each symptom was selected when multiple synonyms and related words were listed. Finally, all of the symptom terms were incorporated into a thesaurus from which the questionnaire was derived. RESULTS: The questionnaire will be used as part of a computer-assisted interview, developed to solicit information from patients regarding their medication regimens and to systematically query them regarding the presence of salient symptoms or complaints. The computer system will eventually interface with the USP DI database to identify drugs from a patient's regimen that may be associated with adverse symptoms. The symptom thesaurus will provide the link to the USP DI database. Preliminary experience with the questionnaire in a limited number of patients has been encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire can assist clinicians in identifying drug-related symptoms including unreported adverse clinical effects of newly marketed or investigational therapeutic agents. When the questionnaire is computerized and linked to a comprehensive database, it can be more widely used to alert healthcare providers of potential adverse drug reactions that may otherwise go undetected.
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗