Cellular telephones and pacemakers: urgent call or wrong number?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to K A Ellenbogen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs have limited efficacy for short-term, rapid termination of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. BACKGROUND: Ibutilide fumarate is an investigational class III antiarrhythmic agent that prolongs repolarization by increasing the slow inward sodium current and by blocking the delayed rectifier current. It can be administered intravenously and has a rapid onset of electrophysiologic effects. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of ibutilide were studied in 200 patients with atrial flutter > 3 h in duration or atrial fibrillation 3 h to 90 days in duration. Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous dose of placebo or an infusion of ibutilide fumarate at 0.005, 0.010, 0.015 or 0.025 mg/kg body weight over 10 min. Conversion was defined as termination of the atrial arrhythmia during or within 60 min after infusion. Forty-one patients received placebo and 159 received ibutilide (0.005 mg/kg [n = 41], 0.010 mg/kg [n = 40], 0.015 mg/kg [n = 38] or 0.025 mg/kg [n = 40]). RESULTS: The arrhythmia terminated in 34% of drug-treated patients. The rates of successful arrhythmia termination were 3% for placebo and 12%, 33%, 45% and 46%, respectively, for 0.005-, 0.010-, 0.015- and 0.025-mg/kg ibutilide. The placebo and 0.005-mg/kg ibutilide groups had lower success rates than all other dose groups (p < 0.05). The mean time to termination of the arrhythmia was 19 min (range 3 to 70) from the start of infusion. Successful arrhythmia termination was not affected by enlarged left atrial diameter, decreased ejection fraction, presence of valvular heart disease or the use of concomitant medications (beta-adrenergic blocking agents, calcium channel blocking agents or digoxin). Arrhythmia termination was not predicted by the magnitude of corrected QT interval prolongation but was associated with a shorter duration of atrial arrhythmia. The most frequent adverse events in ibutilide-treated patients were sustained and nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (3.6%). All patients with sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia were successfully treated with direct current cardioversion and had no recurrence. The occurrence of proarrhythmia did not correlate with ibutilide plasma concentration. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that ibutilide is able to rapidly terminate atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
Atrial fibrillation affects approximately one million persons in the United States, making it the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in clinical practice. Its prevalence increases with age, and occurs in up to 10% of the population in the eighth decade of life. Unlike coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation affects men and women approximately equally and, in an increasingly elderly population, will become an increasing burden to the health care system. The management of atrial fibrillation has undergone significant change in recent years. Large randomized controlled trials have shown that anticoagulation markedly reduces the risk of stroke, and a number of new antiarrhythmic agents are available for the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Furthermore, physicians have become more aware of the potential proarrhythmic side effects of all antiarrhythmic drugs. Finally, new procedures such as radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular junction and permanent pacing are playing increasing roles in the management of this arrhythmia. In this review, the identification of underlying causes and/or precipitating factors of atrial fibrillation, methods to control the ventricular response with atrioventricular nodal blocking drugs, the questions of whether restoration of sinus rhythm is a possible or desirable goal and how best to maintain sinus rhythm, should sinus rhythm be restored, and the importance of long-term anticoagulation with warfarin or antiplatelet therapy with aspirin are discussed.
OBJECTIVES: We determined the short-term effects of single-chamber ventricular pacing and dual-chamber atrioventricular (AV) pacing on directly measured sympathetic nerve activity. BACKGROUND: Dual-chamber AV cardiac pacing results in greater cardiac output and lower systemic vascular resistance than does single-chamber ventricular pacing. However, it is unclear whether these hemodynamic advantages result in less sympathetic nervous system outflow. METHODS: In 13 patients with a dual-chamber pacemaker, we recorded the electrocardiogram, noninvasive arterial pressure (Finapres), respiration and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography) during 3 min of underlying basal heart rate and 3 min of ventricular and AV pacing at rates of 60 and 100 beats/min. RESULTS: Arterial pressure was lowest and muscle sympathetic nerve activity was highest at the underlying basal heart rate. Arterial pressure increased with cardiac pacing and was greater with AV than with ventricular pacing (change in mean blood pressure +/- SE: 10 +/- 3 vs. 2 +/- 2 mm Hg at 60 beats/min; 21 +/- 5 vs. 14 +/- 2 mm Hg at 100 beats/min; p < 0.05). Sympathetic nerve activity decreased with cardiac pacing and the decline was greater with AV than with ventricular pacing (60 beats/min -40 +/- 11% vs. -17 +/- 7%; 100 beats/min -60 +/- 9% vs. -48 +/- 10%; p < 0.05). Although most patients showed a strong inverse relation between arterial pressure and muscle sympathetic nerve activity, three patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 30%) showed no relation between arterial pressure and sympathetic activity. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term AV pacing results in lower sympathetic nerve activity and higher arterial pressure than does ventricular pacing, indicating that cardiac pacing mode may influence sympathetic outflow simply through arterial baroreflex mechanisms. We speculate that the greater incidence of adverse outcomes in patients treated with single-chamber ventricular rather than dual-chamber pacing may be due in part to increased sympathetic nervous outflow.
Newer ICDs provide antitachycardia (ATP) and bradycardia pacing and cardioversion and defibrillation shocks based on sensed interval criteria. The objectives of this investigation were to determine the algorithm related errors in tachycardia confirmation and rate classification that occurred in patients with a third-generation, noncommitted, tiered ICD therapy. Forty-three consecutive patients with the Guardian ATP 4210 ICD, which uses an X out of Y sensed interval counting algorithm for tachycardia detection, confirmation, and classification were studied. Surface ECGs, intracardiac electrograms, stored data logs, and sense histories were reviewed to diagnose errors due to these algorithms that resulted in delivery of inappropriate therapy or inhibition of appropriate therapy. Sixty-eight classification or confirmation algorithm errors from 7,610 tachycardia detections (< 1%) were diagnosed in 23 (53%) of 43 patients. Three types of errors not related to device or sensing lead malfunction or programming mistakes were seen. In 26 episodes, the confirmation algorithm failed to detect late tachycardia reversion of nonsustained tachyarrhythmias, on the last or next to last sensed interval, and did not inhibit ATP (n = 17) or shocks (n = 9). In 28 episodes, inaccurate classification of tachycardia rate resulted in inappropriate ATP (n = 23) or shock (n = 5) therapy. In 14 episodes, the posttherapy reconformation algorithm produced inhibition of VVI pacing and prolonged asystole following shock therapy. These errors in tachycardia confirmation and rate classification were due to the inherent limitations of the X out of Y counting algorithm.
Automatic mode switching pacemakers revert to non-atrial tracking modes in response to sensed atrial tachyarrhythmias. It is unclear how atrial electrogram amplitudes in sinus rhythm compare to those during atrial tachyarrhythmias. In this study, peak-to-peak bipolar atrial electrogram amplitudes were measured during sinus rhythm and either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in 69 patients. The mean atrial electrogram amplitudes were 1.59 +/- 1.36 mV during sinus rhythm and 0.77 +/- 0.58 mV during atrial fibrillation (P < 0.0001) for 25 patients with atrial fibrillation and 1.81 +/- 2.07 mV during sinus and 1.5 +/- 1.81 mV (P < 0.0001) for 44 patients with atrial flutter. The mean electrogram amplitudes during both atrial fibrillation and flutter correlated significantly with amplitudes during sinus rhythm (R = 0.79, R = 0.94, respectively, both P < 0.0001). The coefficient of variance of individual electrogram amplitudes was greater in atrial fibrillation than sinus (P < 0.0001). By comparing 20th percentile electrogram amplitudes in atrial fibrillation and flutter to mean sinus amplitudes, intermittent very low electrogram amplitudes (< 0.3 mV) were more likely during atrial fibrillation and flutter if the mean sinus electrogram amplitudes were < 1.5 mV and < 0.5 mV, respectively (P < 0.01). Eightieth percentile electrogram amplitude values in atrial fibrillation and flutter were equally likely to exceed mean sinus amplitude values in respective patients. In conclusion, mean atrial electrogram amplitudes during atrial fibrillation and flutter are less than but correlated to sinus rhythm electrogram amplitudes. Very low amplitude individual electrograms during these atrial arrhythmias are associated with low mean sinus rhythm electrogram amplitudes. These findings may have implications for the programming of permanent dual chamber pacemakers in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We studied the safety of performing RF catheter ablation in patients with implanted permanent pacemakers by monitoring the function of implanted pacing systems before, during, and immediately after exposure to RF energy. Patients with implanted pacing systems may require RF ablation for treatment of a variety of tachyarrhythmias. High frequency electromagnetic fields, such as RF energy, may affect implanted pacing systems, causing temporary or permanent loss of output, undersensing, oversensing, asynchronous pacing, or reversion to "reset" (Recommended Replacement Time or Power On Reset) parameters. Thirty-five patients with implanted pacing systems (23 DDDR, 6 VVIR, 5 DDD, 1 VVI, 31 bipolar and 4 unipolar) underwent RF catheter ablation. Prior to ablation, each pacing system underwent measurements of pacing and sensing thresholds, telemetry of intracardiac electrograms and measurement of battery voltage and lead impedance(s). During ablation, pacemaker function was monitored by real-time telemetry, intracardiac electrograms, and surface ECG. Immediately after ablation, each pacing system was reevaluated. Telemetry during RF ablation revealed normal pacing and sensing in 14 (40%) of 35 patients. Refractory period extension with asynchronous pacing and noise mode reversion were seen in 16 (46%) of 35 patients. Rare under- and/or oversensing, reversion to reset parameters, and telemetry "lock up" with inhibition of pacing output was seen in a few patients. After ablation, there were no significant changes in atrial or ventricular pacing or sensing thresholds or measurements of atrial and ventricular lead impedances. We conclude that most permanent pacemakers are not adversely affected by exposure to RF energy during catheter ablation. A variety of pacemaker behaviors may be seen during RF ablation, and a thorough understanding of each pulse generator's potential response(s) to electromagnetic interference is important before undertaking catheter ablation in patients with permanent pacemakers. Careful reevaluation of the patient's pacing system following the procedure is mandatory.
Widespread use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Additionally, there has been increasing appreciation during this time for both the lack of efficacy and proarrhythmic activity of antiarrhythmic drugs to treat these cardiac arrhythmias. We evaluated the use of antiarrhythmic drugs from 1987 to 1991 (5-year period) at the time of ICD implantation in 25,450 patients. The use of all classes of antiarrhythmic agents decreased from 61% to 24% during this time period (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant reduction in antiarrhythmic agent use for each drug class (P < 0.05) with the exception of Class II agents (beta blockers). These changes in drug use occurred independent of any changes in age, sex, ejection fraction, prevalence of coronary artery disease, or type of ventricular arrhythmia (VT vs VF).
Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) has varied effects on cardiac electrophysiologic parameters including heart rate, intraatrial conduction time, and refractory period. ANP's vagoexcitatory and sympathoinhibitory actions as well as its direct actions on cardiac ion currents may be responsible for some of these effects. This review discusses the role of ANP in cardiac electrophysiology, its interactions with the autonomic nervous system and baroreceptor reflex, and its effects on cardiac ion currents.
Seventeen healthy supine subjects performed graded Valsalva maneuvers. In four subjects, transesophageal echographic aortic cross-sectional areas decreased during and increased after straining. During the first seconds of straining, when aortic cross-sectional area was declining and peripheral arterial pressure was rising, peroneal sympathetic muscle neurons were nearly silent. Then, as aortic cross-sectional area and peripheral pressure both declined, sympathetic muscle nerve activity increased, in proportion to the intensity of straining. Poststraining arterial pressure elevations were proportional to preceding increases of sympathetic activity. Sympathetic inhibition after straining persisted much longer than arterial and right atrial pressure elevations. Similarly, R-R intervals changed in parallel with peripheral arterial pressure, until approximately 45 s after the onset of straining, when R-R intervals were greater and arterial pressures were smaller than prestraining levels. Our conclusions are as follows: opposing changes of carotid and aortic baroreceptor inputs reduce sympathetic muscle and increase vagal cardiac motor neuronal firing; parallel changes of barorsensory inputs provoke reciprocal changes of sympathetic and direct changes of vagal firing; and pressure transients lasting only seconds reset arterial pressure-sympathetic and -vagal response relations.
Several investigators have demonstrated that changes in atrial or ventricular pressure and size may modulate changes in electrophysiologic properties. The coupling of mechanical and electrical changes in the heart has been termed mechano-electrical feedback and is believed to play a role in arrhythmias observed with mitral valve disease, congestive heart failure, and left ventricular hypertrophy. To avoid confounding influences of the autonomic nervous system on electrophysiologic measurements, we measured right atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds with temporary epicardial pacing wires, right ventricular monophasic action potential duration at 90% repolarization during right ventricular pacing at 600 and 400 ms, donor heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial and central venous pressures in 22 patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. Each variable was measured at baseline, in the resting supine state, and during graded lower body negative pressure of -10, -20, and -30 mm Hg. All levels of lower body negative pressure resulted in a significant decrease in mean right atrial pressure up to 5 +/- 6 mm Hg at maximal lower body negative pressure, and a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure occurred only at -20 and -30 mm Hg. Lower body negative pressure did not result in a significant change in any electrophysiologic variable despite significant changes in right atrial pressure. Thus, in the denervated transplanted human heart, unloading of the right heart results in no or small changes in atrial or ventricular pacing thresholds and ventricular monophasic action potential duration.
BACKGROUND: Technological limitations have precluded investigation of long-term temporal patterns of ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrences. Newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators permit such analyses by accurately recording the time and date of tachycardia detections during long-term follow-up. This study tests the hypothesis that ventricular tachycardia occurrences are randomly distributed over time in individual patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The time and date of 727 episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were recorded from the data logs of 31 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators followed for a median of 177 days (range, 7 to 782 days). All patients had three or more ventricular tachycardia detections and no detections from causes other than ventricular arrhythmias. In 28 of 31 patients, the distribution of the interdetection time intervals during follow-up differed significantly (all P < .01) from an exponential model distribution of interdetection intervals that assumed that detections were equally likely to occur at any time during follow-up (random). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test was used to compare sample and model distributions. In each patient, the nonrandom distributions resulted from a preponderance of interdetection time intervals that were shorter than predicted by the random model, resulting in a temporal clustering of arrhythmic events. The interdetection interval was < or = 1 hour and < or = 91 hours for 55% and 78% of all intervals, respectively. When only those episodes receiving shock or antitachycardia pacing therapy were analyzed, 25 of 29 patients still manifested nonrandom distributions (all P < .01). When only episodes with tachycardia rates > 240 beats per minute were analyzed, 11 of 13 patients manifested non-random distributions (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular tachycardia detections and delivered antitachycardia therapies by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are nonrandomly distributed throughout long-term follow-up in the majority of patients. The temporal clustering of these arrhythmic events may allow preemptive antiarrhythmic therapy and should be considered in the design of therapy based on suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias to statistically derived end points.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the temporal patterns of ventricular tachycardia detections by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for circadian variability. BACKGROUND: Previous studies of circadian arrhythmia patterns have been methodologically limited by very brief observational periods. Late-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators accurately record the times of arrhythmia detections during unlimited follow-up. METHODS: Forty-three patients with late-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were followed up for 226 +/- 179 days (mean +/- SD). The times of all recorded episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were retrieved from the data log of each device during follow-up. RESULTS: The weighted distribution of 830 ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes from the 43 patients fit a single harmonic sine curve model with a peak between 2 and 3 P.M. (95% confidence interval 1:13 to 4:13 P.M., R = 0.75, p < 0.05). The distributions of spontaneously terminating episodes, episodes receiving device therapy, episodes receiving shocks and episodes in the absence of antiarrhythmic therapy also fit the sine curve model (all R = 0.53 and 0.73, all p < 0.05), all with peak frequencies between 2:08 and 3:09 P.M. and 95% confidence intervals for peak frequencies between 11:38 A.M. and 5:07 P.M. Episodes recorded during continuous antiarrhythmic drug therapy did not fit the model (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of ventricular tachyarrhythmias detected by late-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators follows a circadian pattern, with a peak tachycardia frequency between noon and 5 P.M. This pattern was not observed in patients receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Knowledge of circadian periodicity for these events has implications for patient management.
This study examines the efficacy of various doses of intravenous diltiazem to control the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Control of the ventricular response of patients with atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular response can provide patients with relief of symptoms and improve hemodynamics. Eighty-four consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, or both, received an intravenous bolus dose of diltiazem followed by a continuous infusion of diltiazem at 5, 10, and 15 mg/hour. The mean ventricular response and blood pressure were monitored. Overall, 94% of patients (79 of 84) responded to the bolus dose with a > 20% reduction in heart rate from baseline, a conversion to sinus rhythm, or a heart rate < 100 beats/min. Seventy-eight patients received the continuous infusion. After 10 hours of infusion, 47% of patients (confidence interval [CI]: 36%, 59%) had maintained response with the 5 mg/hour infusion, 68% (CI: 57%, 79%) maintained response after the infusion was titrated to 10 mg/hour, and 76% (CI: 66%, 85%) after titration from the 5 and 10 mg/hour infusion to the 15 mg/hour dose. For the 3 diltiazem infusions studied, mean (+/- SD) heart rate was reduced from a baseline value of 144 +/- 14 beats/min to 98 +/- 19, 107 +/- 25, 107 +/- 22, 101 +/- 22, 91 +/- 17, and 88 +/- 18 beats/min at infusion times 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10 hours, respectively. By the end of the infusion, 18% of patients (14 of 78) had conversion to sinus rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
A new generation of defibrillators has been introduced that do not require a thoracotomy. The purpose of this report was to examine 100 consecutive nonthoracotomy implantations at our institution and compare them with a series of 102 patients undergoing thoracotomy implantations by the same surgeon over a 4-year period between August 1989 and September 1994. The two groups were comparable for age, sex, comorbidity, cardiac disease status, ejection fraction, and electrophysiologic presentation. Nonthoracotomy systems were implanted successfully in 94% of patients. Patients undergoing a nonthoracotomy implantation had significantly shorter intensive care unit (1.7 +/- 1.7 versus 3.3 +/- 3.9 days; p < 0.005) and postoperative stays (5.0 +/- 2.8 versus 9.5 +/- 5.6 days; p < 0.001) than patients undergoing a thoracotomy approach. This was due to a significant decrease in the incidence of postoperative complications from 29% in the thoracotomy group to 11% in the nonthoracotomy group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall mortality rates. Nonthoracotomy systems are implantable in the majority of patients and are associated with less morbidity and shorter hospital stays than traditional thoracotomy approaches.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of intravenous sematilide hydrochloride, a selective class III antiarrhythmic agent, in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Class I antiarrhythmic agents, which primarily slow conduction, can depress ventricular function, particularly in patients with heart failure. In contrast, pure class III agents, which selectively prolong repolarization, do not adversely affect hemodynamic variables in animal models, but there are no data evaluating their hemodynamic effects in humans. METHODS: In 39 patients with congestive heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic measurements were obtained at baseline, after a loading dose and during a maintenance infusion of intravenous sematilide using either a low (0.75 then 0.3 mg/min) or high dose (1.5 then 0.6 mg/min) regimen. The study had an 80% power to detect clinically meaningful differences in hemodynamic variables. RESULTS: Both low (n = 20) and high (n = 19) dose sematilide infusions produced dose-dependent increases in QT interval (5 +/- 8% [mean +/- SD] and 18 +/- 10%, respectively) and corrected QT interval (4 +/- 8% and 14 +/- 10%), and high dose sematilide decreased heart rate by 7 +/- 10% (all p < 0.025 vs. baseline). Neither dose regimen had a statistically significant effect on any other hemodynamic variable, including mean arterial, right atrial, pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures; cardiac index, stroke volume, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances; and left ventricular stroke work index. Sematilide showed no adverse hemodynamic effects in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 25% or > 25% and in patients with cardiac index < 2 or > or = 2 liters/min per m2. Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 1) and excessive QT prolongation (n = 4) were seen during the high dose. CONCLUSIONS: Sematilide, in the doses administered, prolonged repolarization but did not alter hemodynamic variables in patients with heart failure. These data suggest that class III antiarrhythmic agents, which selectively prolong repolarization, are not cardiodepressant but may be proarrhythmic in humans, especially at high doses.